Hans Moog 🦋 Profile picture
20 Apr, 10 tweets, 12 min read
@JorgeStolfi @iotafi @pobserver2 @WealthSeeker28 @Mat_Yarger IOTA is not your typical crypto project where you take some well established principles (i.e. blockchain), extend them with a unique selling point and then do an ICO collecting hundreds of millions of dollars that you use to deliver your ideas which by that point are ...
@JorgeStolfi @iotafi @pobserver2 @WealthSeeker28 @Mat_Yarger ... essentially "complete" already.

IOTA started as a research project that tried to go a completely different route than everybody else trying to fix the only remaining issues of Nakamoto Consensus. When it did its ICO it collected 500k USD which were used to pay for the ...
@JorgeStolfi @iotafi @pobserver2 @WealthSeeker28 @Mat_Yarger ... development of the first version.

There was no premine for the founders or the project. The community decided to donate 5% of all the tokens that they bought (25k USD), to establish the IOTA Foundation to further advance and research the technology. Completely ...
@JorgeStolfi @iotafi @pobserver2 @WealthSeeker28 @Mat_Yarger unexpectedly and in my opinion way too early, IOTA received a lot of attention by the crypto market and its market capitalization quickly rose from 500k USD to multiple billions of Dollars.

It was a blessing and a curse at the same time. A blessing, because it allowed the ...
@JorgeStolfi @iotafi @pobserver2 @WealthSeeker28 @Mat_Yarger ... newly founded IOTA Foundation to hire some really talented people and a curse, because the technology was not ready for prime time, yet as it had some serious attack vectors that the developers did not anticipate.

The inability to fix the problems in combination with ...
@JorgeStolfi @iotafi @pobserver2 @WealthSeeker28 @Mat_Yarger ... extremely toxic behavior of some prominent figures in the project led to the perception that IOTA can not be taken seriously and they are essentially just selling snake oil. The newly hired researchers were however very motivated to fix the problems and after months and ...
@JorgeStolfi @iotafi @pobserver2 @WealthSeeker28 @Mat_Yarger ... months of research and questioning everything, we came up with a solution to all of the issues.

Interestingly, the solution did not just fix the biggest issues we had with IOTA but it turned out to be a model that is a complete generalization of all kinds of Nakamoto ...
@JorgeStolfi @iotafi @pobserver2 @WealthSeeker28 @Mat_Yarger ... Consensus. You change a single parameter in the code and the tangle turns into a blockchain with all of the code still functioning in the same way. You change another parameter and you get the block dag (GHOST) consensus family used by Ethereum and others. The power and ...
@JorgeStolfi @iotafi @pobserver2 @WealthSeeker28 @Mat_Yarger ... flexibility of the new datastructures and algorithms is simply mindblowing.

I don't understand why this new approach would have to have a different name? It is the result of research performed by the IOTA Foundation in the pursuit of bringing IOTA's vision to live.
@JorgeStolfi @iotafi @pobserver2 @WealthSeeker28 @Mat_Yarger I would even say that using the money of the community to develop a solution and then just launch it as a new project would have been absolutely unethical and downright treacherous.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hans Moog 🦋

Hans Moog 🦋 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hus_qy

19 Apr
@JorgeStolfi @pobserver2 @WealthSeeker28 @Mat_Yarger You can criticize the early IOTA for:

- assuming that resource constrained IoT devices would provide enough PoW security (hash power)
- using a slow and gameable random walk to "find" the heaviest branch
- using ternary logic and alot of other things

but I strongly disagree ...
@JorgeStolfi @pobserver2 @WealthSeeker28 @Mat_Yarger ... with the statement that it started with a totally broken idea. The idea to translate the longest chain wins consensus of Nakamoto into a heaviest branch wins consensus in a DAG is absolutely brilliant - and imho even necessary if you want to deliver on the original vision ...
@JorgeStolfi @pobserver2 @WealthSeeker28 @Mat_Yarger ... of Satoshi to create a completely decentralized network that can be used as a medium of exchange (a real currency).

Nakamoto consensus is the most secure and robust consensus mechanism that we know and it would in theory work well with millions of nodes and millions of ...
Read 11 tweets
28 Mar
@lKuzon It is true that IOTA nodes can be configured to prune old data that is no longer needed but this doesn't make the system less secure.

In fact Bitcoin has exactly the same option which is called "pruning mode" and which was introduced as part of Bitcoin Core 0.11 in 2014.
@lKuzon The reason why Bitcoin, Ethereum, IOTA and pretty much any major cryptocurrency that exists has such a feature in their node software, is due to the fact that it does not impact the security and nodes do not even access this old data anymore as part of their consensus mechanism.
@lKuzon It is true that IOTA will produce more data than a Bitcoin node so there will most probably be more people having this pruning mode enabled and less people that will maintain a full history of everything that ever happened.

Roman argues that this will make it harder to find ...
Read 7 tweets
26 Mar
@ThroneOfCrypto @__Javs_ @TheADAApe That's totally fine. I think Cardano serves its purpose very well but it wouldn't perform very well in the scenario I just described.

The BFT-style aspect of Ouroboros would already prevent a lot the required properties to hold (i.e. dynamic availability).
@ThroneOfCrypto @__Javs_ @TheADAApe After re-reading your comment, I think I misunderstood you.

You didn't mean to simply remove fees from the game all together but to allow merchants to i.e. cover the cost for their clients.

Of course this can be done with delegated fees and it is a powerful concept to lower ...
@ThroneOfCrypto @__Javs_ @TheADAApe ... the entry barrier for new users and boost adoption (especially if your gains have enough margin to cover these costs).

Well ... In that case just read my comment as a nice summary of IOTAs vision 😅
Read 4 tweets
25 Mar
@ThroneOfCrypto @__Javs_ @TheADAApe I disagree with that you could just "remove fees for end users on Cardano".

The fees are not only rewards for staking (nobody would stake if there would be no fees, so you need a completely different anti-sybil mechanism) but they are also a vital part of the spam-protection ...
@ThroneOfCrypto @__Javs_ @TheADAApe ... mechanism. Going feeless is ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE more complex than just "not paying the validators".

Regarding you other points, I can however understand where you are coming from and your concerns would be completely justified if IOTA would be like any other DLT. It is ...
@ThroneOfCrypto @__Javs_ @TheADAApe ... however very important to understand the vision and purpose of IOTA. IOTA is not just trying to build a "better DLT" but a protocol that can serve as a foundation for the upcoming "Internet of Things".

The vision of this "4th industrial revolution" is that machines will ...
Read 14 tweets
23 Feb
@tofeeornottofee @sattiota @Lazylefty1 @mira_hurley @Jackalope1357 @PeterSchiff @Eljaboom @elonmusk I am a DLT researcher so when I try to determine the "scalability" of a particular consensus, then I am usually not that much interested in the current performance of the system under the current conditions but I ask questions like:
@tofeeornottofee @sattiota @Lazylefty1 @mira_hurley @Jackalope1357 @PeterSchiff @Eljaboom @elonmusk "How does the system perform when you increase the amount of nodes?" or "How does the system perform when you increase the amount of validators?"

So when I talk about scalability, I talk about "big O notation" kind of things rather than actual TPS numbers.
@tofeeornottofee @sattiota @Lazylefty1 @mira_hurley @Jackalope1357 @PeterSchiff @Eljaboom @elonmusk NANO works fine if the amount of validators is not too large (currently you have 4-5 validators that have > 50% of the weight).

If you are fine with this number of validators, then you don't even need to be worried about any of the things I wrote but as soon as the amount of ...
Read 9 tweets
19 Feb
I really hope that DeFi and it's inevitable future of having to deal with these kind of "problems" will finally make people understand why it is a bad idea to build decentralized systems that try to establish a shared perception of time among all nodes.

It doesn't just severely limit scalability but it also creates these really tricky problems where even if you build a system that is "secure" and where the participants are incentivized to behave "honest", it ultimately doesn't matter because at the end of the day every ...
... block producer runs an algorithm and there will always be people that will study these algorithms and try to game them to their advantage.

As soon as you give "somebody" (no matter how honest) control over how others perceive time you are in for some serious problems.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!