Small thread.
The problem is not that Joe Biden might have influenced the jury. They're sequestered. He didn't.
The problem is not that Joe Biden might have incited riots. They'll happen without him.
Joe Biden couldn't convince a starving bear to eat fish.
--
The problem is not that Joe Biden might have influenced the jury. They're sequestered. He didn't.
The problem is not that Joe Biden might have incited riots. They'll happen without him.
Joe Biden couldn't convince a starving bear to eat fish.
--
--
The problem is that a chief officer of the executive branch is designating "right decisions" to a coequal branch of government IN A CRIMINAL CASE!
A criminal case is when the executive branch of government is attempting to deprive person's of their liberty. An independent-
The problem is that a chief officer of the executive branch is designating "right decisions" to a coequal branch of government IN A CRIMINAL CASE!
A criminal case is when the executive branch of government is attempting to deprive person's of their liberty. An independent-
-- judicial branch is one of the most important stopgaps that keeps the government from abusing that power to deprive people of liberty.
If the executive can dictate "right decisions" on such matters to the judiciary, you don't have a justice system. You have a dictatorship. --
If the executive can dictate "right decisions" on such matters to the judiciary, you don't have a justice system. You have a dictatorship. --
-- Did Biden create a dictatorship with his statements?
Of course not. But he certainly went further than Trump ever did in expressing dictatorial sentiments.
Trump has gone after the Courts in civil disputes. He's excoriated them for things like DACA decisions and their --
Of course not. But he certainly went further than Trump ever did in expressing dictatorial sentiments.
Trump has gone after the Courts in civil disputes. He's excoriated them for things like DACA decisions and their --
-- handling of the election.
A) He, as a citizen, was a party in the dispute. For the election.
B) More importantly, A CIVIL TRIAL HAS MUCH LOWER STANDARDS OF DECORUM BECAUSE YOU AREN'T ATTEMPTING TO DEPRIVE ANYONE OF THEIR LIFE OR LIBERTY IF THE CASE GOES AGAINST THEM
A) He, as a citizen, was a party in the dispute. For the election.
B) More importantly, A CIVIL TRIAL HAS MUCH LOWER STANDARDS OF DECORUM BECAUSE YOU AREN'T ATTEMPTING TO DEPRIVE ANYONE OF THEIR LIFE OR LIBERTY IF THE CASE GOES AGAINST THEM
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
