As the Super League dies a quick death, let us take a moment to note that "durrrr, MLB and the NHL should do relegation and promotion, durrrr" is as dumb and ignorant as any take defending the Super League
Yes, let's just put a few of these teams in the NHL every year, I can see absolutely no logistical issues with material impact on league revenues
MLB's annual revenues are nearly double the Premier League's, despite Rob Manfred's best efforts I'm confident the business model will survive without concern trolling from people who don't know anything about the sport sportscasting.com/america-only-h…
"Your league has promotion and relegation. No one cares."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Florida being BY FAR the most popular state among Republicans -- beating runner-up Alaska by more than 10 points -- explains a lot seattletimes.com/seattle-news/d…
Only 5 states are underwater with people of both parties, and I think I would have guessed at least 3 on the first go-round
Dear Bari: I never thought this would happen to me, but if Jesse Helms had been president we never would have had any of these problems lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/04/dear-b…
If not for Bari's finance bro, where else would we be able to read about Martin Luther King, the uncontroversial figure whose entire career consisted of one speech that contained one sentence, except for every conservative publication that has ever existed?
It's the Chris Rock "you're not racist if you didn't literally shoot Medgar Evers" routine, but unironically:
Ah yes, the antebellum and Jim Crow South, legendary for their commitment to majoritarian democracy
Say this for Bill Buckley: unlike his National Review successors who have carried on his magazine's support for vote suppression, he at least understood how Jim Crow worked
Also, while of course nobody (including Chait) thinks that democracy means "pure majoritarianism," I would love to hear one of these NRO guys explain specifically how disenfranchising minorities will result in increased protections for their tights
I don't disagree with everything in @Nate_Cohn analysis of the potential effects of the law, but this argument that it actually expands day-of access is way too charitable:
In terms of the early voting provisions, as the more detailed analysis that appeared in the Times yesterday makes clear, it will be irrelevant to the urban areas with the biggest lines, since they already had these early voting days: nytimes.com/2021/04/02/us/…
This is a VERY good analysis of why the Georgia vote suppression law is, in fact, very bad nytimes.com/2021/04/02/us/…
The bill cuts the time frame for requesting absentee ballots in half. (Note -- and this will be a theme -- this is just pure vote suppression, with no even remotely colorable connection to fraud)
Compare how vote suppression apologist Rich Lowry poo-poos the dramatic cutback in ballot drop boxes with what the statute actually does. (Again, pure vote suppression -- there is zero evidence of fraud at drop boxes.)
Higher ed is a real microcosm for the American political economy. Revenues -- mostly tuition -- have skyrockted (these are inflation-adjusted numbers): lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/03/univer…
But despite what the Republican nominees on the board of trustees might like to believe faculty compensation has actually *declined* during this period:
Mean salaries for full-time faculty have increased modestly, although far less than the growth in revenue, but far less faculty are full-time, and part-time faculty are generally compensated with starvation wages.