1/ Hello @COVIDSCIONTARIO. If the statement below is true and the "science" you are providing is settled, please show your work: 
2/The most optimistic study puts outdoor transmission as the source of 0.1% of (high CT) positive PCR tests. The 2M rule is unscientific nonsense, as are outdoor masks. Where is your evidence? Outside is safe. Period.
3/Thinking a piece of cloth will protect you from an aerosolized virus is insane. The data bears this out. Masks are not the least bit innocuous.
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
4/Unless ppl are locked in their homes for a month, followed by 100% travel elimination between regions (no delivery drivers, flights in/out, essential travel), virus will circulate. It's endemic in ON. The zero covid ship has sailed. Where is your cost/benefit? Lockdowns kill.
5/Vax rates have correlated with increased hospitalizations in ON. Recommending an emergency use, new tech vax with dubious safety data for anyone but those most at risk of C19 death/complications is irresponsible. 0.15% global IFR virus. Who knows what the vax will do long-term?
6/End test/trace/isolate. Return the def. of a case to a positive test (at a proper CT), plus clinical diagnosis. Cases will drop right off. Health care worker shortages will ease. Return to encouraging ppl to stay home when symptomatic. Sure, pay them.
7/This is a failure to recognize action/reaction. Closing non-essential industry causes unintended consequences down the line, example: Current supply chain issues around the world. Sure, improve ventilation and close quarters. Masks are useless.
8/So let's see your science on masks & 2M distancing, transparent all-cause death data, C19 vax safety, yr over yr ICU comparison, proof that lockdown have worked in ON-like jurisdictions (no, not a low pop density island w/different seasonality and different testing criteria).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
