@LADYRAMPANT you claim "of course Scotland could be in the EU" and to have a master's in EU law; I'm hoping you can clarify some points?
Nicola Sturgeon claims we can keep the pound ( pegged or Sterlingised) and join the EU.
How could we close chapter 17 of the Acquis on Monetary Policy without Governance of Monetary policies such as quantitative easing and interest rates?
Can you outline if, when and how we would meet the Copenhagen Criteria for EU membership application?
If we launch a new currency, how long would it take after depegging and initial volatility before we could start to build the 4 to 5 years track record in price stability that is a key economic Copenhagen Criteria?
Has there been any indication that the EU will provide treaty change to widen the criteria for Scotland, and isn't it the case that would then apply to all applicants, and require universal ratification in every member state's domestic Parliament or system?
And isnt it the case that the Spanish reassurance is only on the basis of meeting the legal Copenhagen Criteria of achieving Independence with a constitutional path that Westminster recognises, and not a wildcat plebiscite?
And that we couldn't begin to close any of the chapters of the Acquis that are currently reserved matters until after we had completed exit negotiations from the UK?
And do you agree that the letter from the EC to the Scottish parliament committee stating in 2014 that Independence meant leaving is genuine? And yet that after it was received Nicola Sturgeon claimed there was no risk?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) if Scotland did become independent I would want it to be in the EU, I just a) don't think that's feasible and b) it doesn't offset damage of leaving UK
Many times when I point out the process and problems of EU membership, and someone realised they can't wish away issues (like keeping the pound and closing Chapter 17) they just dismiss it with "we'll just join EFTA in the meantime"
First: even if that was a trade equivalent of low tarrif EU membership it might be the least of bad options but it's still much worse than the status quo for trade
Hi @MairiMcAllan got your leaflet and I have some questions...
1. You show an EU flag; can you confirm or deny that the SNP have a feasibility study into how long it would take an independent Scotland to join, and it makes a direct comparison to Montenegro (19 years)
2. You say "once the pandemic is behind us... ...from Boris Johnson"
So logically - if, by the time the pandemic is fully gone, Boris is no longer PM, then you will withdraw the threat of a referendum?
3. You claim we reject Nuclear Weapons - can you confirm you want an independent Scotland to be a Denmark style NATO member- allowing all NATO nuclear armed ships including rUK subs full and free access to all Scottish ports and waters?
This is a lengthy, but very worthwhile article. It's as relevant to the UK including Scotland as well as the USA.
You can listen to it as well. I recommend it.
@MhairiHunter I'd argue lying about there being EU legal advice in 2014, then using our money to cover up the lie, then surpressing the committee findings was controversial.
@MhairiHunter Selecting a small subset of years of figures to base the whitepaper"s hopelessly optimistic economic model on; that was controversial.
@MhairiHunter Having two nuclear reactors in Scotland, but no processing or storage for the waste - all done in England, and glossing over this when it would cost billions and be dangerous for centuries in an independent Scotland: that's controversial
Amidst domestic Scandals, @theSNP will try in May to woo Scottish remain voters to lend them a pro-EU vote.
But what do you actually know about the SNPs history with Europe?
Let's have a look...
1975: @theSNP campaigned against the UK entering Europe.
Some of their anti-Europe arguments may sound familiar. Though needless to say their project fear predictions of not voting how they demanded didn't come true.