this thread also inspired by thinking about PCT since it would seem that desires emerge as like the alluring voices of higher-level control systems that aren't transparent to consciousness
this also makes it a bit weird to talk about "subconscious" because this kind of higher-level control feels more like "superconscious" as in these processes are "above" or "transcendent"
Scott Alexander says "PCT is a good model, but whatβs good about it is that it approximates PP. It approximates PP best at the lower levels, and so is most useful there; its thoughts on the higher levels remain useful but start to diverge and so become less profound."
ok, later he says PCT is just a lot easier to understand than the obscure Bayesian free energy babble
I guess I appreciate how PP uses predict in a weird way; it's kind of nice because these theories themselves seem to weirdly invert the typical picture of perception and action; there's a similar weirdness in the notion of "controlling perceptions"
like, the first instinct is to say "how can you control perceptions, perceptions are just what you receive from the world, you can only control your actions" but no, actions are what you USE to control perception, i.e. to get the experience that you want
here's Alexander on that point (FE/PC here is "free energy / predictive coding")
reflecting on a thought about exercise and exertion and intentional work
I think there should be a way to talk about Alasdair MacIntyre's view of action, narrative, and virtue with the PCT framework, and I think this would be very interesting
MacIntyre says the intellectual culture has problems understanding how actions aren't atomic but parts of larger structures that must be understood narratively, and that you can't understand your life unless you see the narrative structures in which you're embedded
PCT seems to agree that there are no atomic actions, it's all just different levels of control that bottom out in muscle activation but emanate from higher levels, that life is a continuous fractal unfolding
here the "predictive" framework also seems like a good vocabulary, because narrative is all about predictive processing: expectations, obligations, debts, setting things straight, correcting mistakes, etc
so basically I suspect that keeping in mind something like MacIntyre's account of action, narrative, social life, and ethics will be a good way to understand and maybe engage critically with these "cybernetic" theories
when MacIntyre says "deprive children of stories and you leave them anxious stutterers in speech and action" I think that is resonant for the same reason that Scott Alexander finds PCT an excellent novel explanation for tremors
hearing stories is like training a repertoire of narratives that exemplify how high-level errors can be propagated through down to speech and action, and this cultural learning is as important as learning how to talk and walk
this whole PCT thing points very exactly to what I've been trying to get a handle on, like in this thread from January:
and this thread about flow, decisions, activity, which goes into top-down & bottom up and then turns to religious ideas like God, sin, karma, nirvana, before coming back to ADHD
back in January also thinking about MacIntyre and the linking between top-down and bottom-up, ADHD and social structures, etc etc, feels good to reconnect with this "research project" with a new lens
MacIntyre criticizing not only behaviorism but the whole notion of behavior as separate from multiscale intentional arcs; PCT criticizes behaviorism in a similar way
hmm, itβs not that a self is everything in a holistic sense, but a self is an βindexβ for everything
the Proustian smell of a childhood cookie is an example: the smell activates a certain self (or βselfoidβ) which then launches a mood and outlook that encompasses the whole lifeworld
selves are like perspectives, like cameras with idiosyncratic filters and focusing tendencies, like origins that the world is organized around
@AskYatharth I wonder if βGodβ is a way of non-doing with larger scale intentions. Like, letting Jesus take the wheel. You donβt just trust your gut intuition, but attune to the wisdom of the universal conscience.
@AskYatharth In general Iβm very curious how people manage to bring larger scale motivation, perception, direction into the present moment of non-coercive unfolding.
@AskYatharth Institutions are one way, I suppose: the social architecture aligns your daily actions with institutional frames. But that doesnβt seem sufficient.
For years Iβve been fascinated and confused by the issue of what I call βstate ontology.β How do nation states exist, how do they affect the existence of other beings, what is their fundamental role? And how do people perceive the stateβs being, beyond political opinions?
The pandemic has reinvigorated this question and provided an enormous clue for how to think about it.
Epidemiology, vaccination, border control all seem to show the ontology of the state, although I donβt know what to read to clarify this intuition.