🧡 research blog for Perceptual Control Theory (PCT) βš‘οΈβš–οΈπŸŒ‘πŸ’ͺπŸ€–
this thread also inspired by thinking about PCT since it would seem that desires emerge as like the alluring voices of higher-level control systems that aren't transparent to consciousness

this also makes it a bit weird to talk about "subconscious" because this kind of higher-level control feels more like "superconscious" as in these processes are "above" or "transcendent"
I read Slate Star Codex review of the original 1970s book by Will Powers slatestarcodex.com/2017/03/06/boo…
oh, so perceptual control is an older ancestor of "predictive processing", that's why it feels so familiar

I'm kind of trying to speedrun the past few years of rationalist zeitgeist theory exploration I guess

slatestarcodex.com/2017/09/06/pre…
Scott Alexander says "PCT is a good model, but what’s good about it is that it approximates PP. It approximates PP best at the lower levels, and so is most useful there; its thoughts on the higher levels remain useful but start to diverge and so become less profound."
ok, later he says PCT is just a lot easier to understand than the obscure Bayesian free energy babble Image
I guess I appreciate how PP uses predict in a weird way; it's kind of nice because these theories themselves seem to weirdly invert the typical picture of perception and action; there's a similar weirdness in the notion of "controlling perceptions" Image
like, the first instinct is to say "how can you control perceptions, perceptions are just what you receive from the world, you can only control your actions" but no, actions are what you USE to control perception, i.e. to get the experience that you want
here's Alexander on that point (FE/PC here is "free energy / predictive coding") Image
reflecting on a thought about exercise and exertion and intentional work

I think there should be a way to talk about Alasdair MacIntyre's view of action, narrative, and virtue with the PCT framework, and I think this would be very interesting

MacIntyre says the intellectual culture has problems understanding how actions aren't atomic but parts of larger structures that must be understood narratively, and that you can't understand your life unless you see the narrative structures in which you're embedded
PCT seems to agree that there are no atomic actions, it's all just different levels of control that bottom out in muscle activation but emanate from higher levels, that life is a continuous fractal unfolding
here the "predictive" framework also seems like a good vocabulary, because narrative is all about predictive processing: expectations, obligations, debts, setting things straight, correcting mistakes, etc
so basically I suspect that keeping in mind something like MacIntyre's account of action, narrative, social life, and ethics will be a good way to understand and maybe engage critically with these "cybernetic" theories Image
when MacIntyre says "deprive children of stories and you leave them anxious stutterers in speech and action" I think that is resonant for the same reason that Scott Alexander finds PCT an excellent novel explanation for tremors
hearing stories is like training a repertoire of narratives that exemplify how high-level errors can be propagated through down to speech and action, and this cultural learning is as important as learning how to talk and walk
this whole PCT thing points very exactly to what I've been trying to get a handle on, like in this thread from January:
this thread on goals as horizons is also very PCT adjacent
and this thread about flow, decisions, activity, which goes into top-down & bottom up and then turns to religious ideas like God, sin, karma, nirvana, before coming back to ADHD

back in January also thinking about MacIntyre and the linking between top-down and bottom-up, ADHD and social structures, etc etc, feels good to reconnect with this "research project" with a new lens

hey @Malcolm_Ocean have you seen anyone applying PCT-like frameworks to ADHD?
from "The Interdisciplinary Handbook of Perceptual Control Theory":

"Surely there must be a way to link higher level thoughts with moment-to-moment action?"

yes, that's what I worry about every day after breakfast Image
MacIntyre criticizing not only behaviorism but the whole notion of behavior as separate from multiscale intentional arcs; PCT criticizes behaviorism in a similar way
woodworking, controlling the environment, Elaine Scarry and alienation
agency, sympathy, solidarity, engagement, engine & drivetrain, Napoleon

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with meekaale πŸŒ³πŸ•πŸŒž

meekaale πŸŒ³πŸ•πŸŒž Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @meekaale

21 Jul
wtf is personhood
accidentally stumbling on the largest mysteries in all of philosophy, ok let's just look it up on wikipedia real quick
women, children, disabled, animals, aliens, artificial intelligences Image
Read 5 tweets
11 Mar
hmm, it’s not that a self is everything in a holistic sense, but a self is an β€œindex” for everything
the Proustian smell of a childhood cookie is an example: the smell activates a certain self (or β€œselfoid”) which then launches a mood and outlook that encompasses the whole lifeworld
selves are like perspectives, like cameras with idiosyncratic filters and focusing tendencies, like origins that the world is organized around
Read 8 tweets
10 Mar
the vertical charges the horizontal
I’m going to have to write a blog post about this whole thread tomorrow
the relationship between teleology and personhood
Read 4 tweets
24 Feb
πŸ“ Today I wrote about our Twitter community, its exodus from rationalism, and the Slate Star Codex rejection of virtue ethics.

roamresearch.com/#/app/mikaelog…
Read 4 tweets
24 Feb
@AskYatharth I wonder if β€œGod” is a way of non-doing with larger scale intentions. Like, letting Jesus take the wheel. You don’t just trust your gut intuition, but attune to the wisdom of the universal conscience.
@AskYatharth In general I’m very curious how people manage to bring larger scale motivation, perception, direction into the present moment of non-coercive unfolding.
@AskYatharth Institutions are one way, I suppose: the social architecture aligns your daily actions with institutional frames. But that doesn’t seem sufficient.
Read 5 tweets
23 Feb
For years I’ve been fascinated and confused by the issue of what I call β€œstate ontology.” How do nation states exist, how do they affect the existence of other beings, what is their fundamental role? And how do people perceive the state’s being, beyond political opinions?
The pandemic has reinvigorated this question and provided an enormous clue for how to think about it.
Epidemiology, vaccination, border control all seem to show the ontology of the state, although I don’t know what to read to clarify this intuition.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(