Lord Advocate has gone rogue again - Backers of #PeoplesAS30 check your emails please. For everyone else here's the breakdown.
Yesterday, the Lord Advocate (Yes! The person who is supposed to defend the Scottish Parliament and who is a member of the Scottish Government) took it upon himself to lodge documents with the court with regards to a case brought in the high court of England...
and try to found upon it as a precedent which the court should consider as part of the people's action. Today, the Advocate General (Yes! The conservative advocate general that represents the Tory Government at Westminster) predictably lodged paperwork that basically says....
"What he said!"

I am no longer making any attempt to hide my contempt for the Lord Advocate who seems to be on a mission to undermine the Scottish Parliament and its powers. The man is a menace to the Scottish Parliament!
Counsel has lodged a response and the long and the short of it is that we have (quite rightly) stated that the Lord Advocate has unilaterally (and without notice) taken it upon himself to place new material before the court despite the court having made avizandum...
...which is legal-speak for the judges having already retired to consider the arguments. It's highly strange (or some might argue, highly convenient) that this has happened after parliament broke for the election. Go figure!
There are some things to note about this supposed ruling in England that the Lord Advocate is trying to have the judges consider - it was in reference to a judicial review.
Our case is not a judicial review. It was a ruling from the English Courts - Scotlands legal system is not the same as England's legal system. It was a ruling under English Law - Scottish law is different from English Law; and the material substance of the ruling...
... has diddly squat to do with our case.

A judicial review in England & Wales has no precedential value in Scotland!

There are obviously other arguments we've advanced but that is the broad strokes.
Doesn't it make you just feel warm and fuzzy that the Lord Advocate (who is supposed to protect the powers and prerogatives of the Scottish Parliament) is using your tax money to undermine the Scottish Parliament.
The man has become more political than I am!
I'll tell you one thing! I make it to Holyrood in this election - we're going to have a very big conversation about the separation of powers and actually obtaining someone who'll defend our national parliament, not undermine it!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Martin Keatings 4 Mid-Scotland and Fife (Personal)

Martin Keatings 4 Mid-Scotland and Fife (Personal) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MartinJKeatings

20 Apr
Update on #PeoplesAS30: It would seem that the UK Gov is trying to enter irrelevant rulings into the case after the hearings. A case under English law (so different jurisdiction) on a judicial review (ours is not a judicial review)....
...in which the people's action is mentioned. The substance of the case submitted is wholly irrelevant to the people's action.
Oh! and the case itself was based on English Constitutional convention, not Scottish. So just hogwash, basically.
Read 4 tweets
20 Apr
This whole #GetOutOfMyPub incident just goes to show how angry the hospitality industry is and people will say that closing pubs was necessary, and they'd be right....the first time round. However, we live on an Island. Had the UK Government setup proper track and trace...
...with testing at the UK's ports and airports, they could have gone for broke like the likes of New Zealand and eradicated this virus from the UK mainland. Testing would have seriously mitigated the chance of COVID coming back with a vengeance and disruption...
...to UK businesses would have been much less than it has been. They like to blame the public for the second wave etc, but the reality is that if they'd actually implemented proper testing (like the WHO kept repeating TEST TEST TEST) at ports...
Read 5 tweets
19 Apr
A very stark opinion from a friend in medicine this week who's been reviewing my medical notes and believes that as a child I might not just have had "balance issues" which you've already seen me talk about previously...
...instead, combined with medical issues in adulthood, they believe I may have dyspraxia (or similar). It not only explains my medical issues which appeared 15 years ago but also explains something more worrying. Nobody picked up on it, and because...
...clinicians selectively disregarded certain information over the last decade and a half, they chose to deal with my symptoms like they would a normal person. The problem is that the medications they've been giving me are Central Nervous System depressants...
Read 16 tweets
10 Apr
The policy of the greens that they would seek to use the powers of holyrood to get rid of trident is complete and utter nonsense. There's only one way not to have trident in Scotland and that is NOT TO BE in a nuclear state like the UK.
Trident can only be removed from our shores by one means - independence followed by a direct order to the UK Government to remove its nuclear garbage from next to our second-largest city with a deadline after which we'll dump it on WM's front porch.
This is not an issue like fracking where you can simply block it by declaring a moratorium. These weapons are already there and good luck trying to rid Scotland of them under the UK Government.
Read 13 tweets
9 Apr
I'll not be opining on the death of Philip. This is because I do not believe in monarchy. I see them as having no right to a higher station than any other person. I consider everyone to be equal.
To me this is a case of a normal 99-year-old person who has had a good run in life, passing away. I have sympathy for his family for their loss, as I would for any person who has lost a loved one. But not knowing Philip personally, I can opine no further than that.
I can attribute no special meaning to his passing above what I would consider being appropriate for any other person I don't know passing away.
Read 4 tweets
6 Apr
Aidan O'Neill QC commences his submission to the court by referencing the declaration of Scotland (Arbroath) on the day of its anniversary for its absolutely unequivocal assertion and statement that in Scotland,
sovereignty rests with the people.
Aidan O'Neill states that it is fascinating to compare the Claim of 1689 to the English Bill of rights.
There is a different notion of sovereignty in England compared to Scotland. In England, sovereignty filters down from the king or queen. In Scotland, it rests with the people.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!