When are we going to confront the reality that countless “Left” media personalities are directly and indirectly complicit in perpetuating the narrative that there is no way out, simply by critiquing *what is*, without exploring (in very practical, accessible terms) *what can be*?
One of the most insidious elements of this phenomenon is that it is actually driven by the logics of these social media platforms most of us use to communicate.

Talking heads channel our righteous rage into low-hanging-fruit “takes” instead of informational seeds for liberation.
“Organize locally,” “join a union,” and “make sure to vote in your local elections” are frequently empty, meaningless, vague, footnote talking points anchored in zero political programs, and in what are typically broader discussions about horrible recent events, or personalities.
How much of the discourse you promote is about politicians, celebs, drama amongst talking heads, drama in orgs, or cycling through systemic critiques your echo chambers have heard thousands of times already? As opposed to concrete methods for movement-building and systems change?
Those of us for systems change should know better than to place primary emphasis on “clicks” or “numbers” when formulating ideas we’re putting out into the world, but if you’re a talking head looking to “monetize” and “make a living” off “takes,” these concerns go out the window.
There is more money to be made in discussing the problems of Capitalism than proposing practical steps for challenging Capitalism in the construction of something better.

As a matter of fact, the capitalist logic is easily employed to commodify critique of the capitalist system.
Our “North Star” should be practical solutions for systems change, namely exchange of info dealing with social, economic, and political institutions that can help us build direct democracy in every sphere of life.

Talking problems and personalities without this is a distraction.
When you go over problems over and over again, without exploring strategies for systems change, it leaves people overwhelmed and hopeless.

And if you are okay with going over problems over and over again without exploring solutions (because $$$ >), you are a part of the problem.
Many of the figures we are referring to here are not even conscious or aware of the fact that this is what they are doing.

Many of them are just doing what they think is best or makes the most sense.

But we must interrogate the underlying structures that inform our behaviors...
We must discuss problems.

But there is no hope or systems change without solutions.

And there are solutions. There is a direction.

We just need to collectively discuss, flesh out, and educate ourselves on the means by which we pursue these solutions and move in this direction.
If you are anchored in solutions or a program for systems change, this changes your entire orientation regarding media and education, and allows for a much more “guided” convo that is able to tie back to frameworks for freedom.

Without programmatic “anchors,” we are lost at sea.
If you’ve made it to the end of this thread, here are the main questions we ask you:

What is your program for systems change? What do you propose? What world do you want to live in, and how do you see us getting there?

We are proposing #DualPower. See our pinned tweet for more.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Black Socialists in America

Black Socialists in America Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BlackSocialists

20 Apr
Key questions are asked here, but dialogue about “dual power” that starts around 27 minutes in is a bit vague and outdated.

No mention of:

• AANES (Rojava)

• Democratic Confederalism

• MAREZ

• Cooperation Jackson

• Symbiosis

• Communalism

• Libertarian Municipalism
Our response here is being made in good faith.

While it is tiring to have to revisit and re-explain concepts and methodology we have been acting on for years now, it is absolutely necessary, and we *need* each other.

All we ask is that people do their due diligence in research.
For a more expansive breakdown of the history of “dual power” specifically, please see the thread below.

Read 25 tweets
28 Jan
As people become more open to the idea that Capitalism is trash, don’t leave them hanging without suggestions for what the institutional alternatives could be, and how we can build them!

Anticapitalist slogans are great, but they are not enough.

People want practical solutions.
We have new (and much more accessible) resources and materials regarding “institutional alternatives” and organization on the way, but the thread below is a great place to start.

Read 4 tweets
27 Jan
As much as “progressive,” Social Democratic politicians talk about “democracy” and throw around the word “grassroots,” you’d think more of them would be interested in moving campaigns that help poor and working-class people build grassroots, direct democracy in their communities.
The “politician” role is an inherently *top-down* role under our current socioeconomic paradigm and system of governance.

Therein lies the contradiction for “progressives.”

Even amongst so-called “progressives,” the implicit/assumed orientation is an orientation of paternalism.
“Democracy” is a concept only spoken to in the context of “representative democracy.”

“Grassroots” is a concept only spoken to in the context of “grassroots” efforts to elect new “representatives” or “leaders.”

Very few politicians are interested in addressing these conundrums.
Read 5 tweets
10 Jan
The 300,000+ indigenous Mayans who make up the Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities (MAREZ) in Chiapas, Mexico have one of the most advanced systems of democratic, consensus-based governance in the world.

Here are some clips from “People Without Faces” (2016) that explain.
“Suggest, but do not impose.

Represent, but do not replace.

Build, but do not ruin.

Obey, but do not dictate.

Descend to the people, but do not dominate.

Persuade, but do not defeat.

Serve the others, but not yourself.”
“If there is some profit remaining from the work, the representative gathers all of the families of the support base, and they make a decision on how to use that profit, where to invest it.”
Read 8 tweets
6 Jan
For years, Liberals, left-Liberals (“progressive” Social Democrats), and baby Leftists have looked at us as too “radical” or “unrealistic.”

Now it is becoming more clear to many that things are going to get more and more “radical” and “surreal,” whether they want them to or not.
Anyone who has studied 20th-century German history knows *exactly* what is happening right now.

Anyone who has studied events all throughout Latin America within the last century knows *exactly* what is happening right now.

Not only is it not shocking...

It has been predicted.
Get with the program.

The program is #DualPower.

It’s not just one thing. It’s not just one tool.

It’s every tool in the toolkit.

And it’s grounded in principles of cooperation, communalism, direct democracy, consensus, prefigurative politics, internationalism, and much more.
Read 6 tweets
26 Dec 20
Informal hierarchies will develop in movements for systems change, but there should be zero tolerance for attempts to gatekeep in these movements.

Be skeptical of those taking on “organizer” or “activist” as an identity under broader organization and then expressing entitlement.
True social revolution is the culmination of many different social processes that are catalyzed as a result of many different actions in many different places. Not all of these social processes are catalyzed through actions tied to people or forces grounded in Left values either.
There are also many areas in which people must move in order to help others self-organize and cooperate; there is no one space to “organize,” and no one network through which people develop new social relations.

No one person or group can have a monopoly on new social relations.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!