Our team had a lively discussion yesterday around @kubernetesio and the fallacy of innovation & ROI from tech. I am usually the curmudgeon old grey beard, but K8 is one of those stacks that just make sense. Let me explain...
(1/9)
The days before the containerised world, we sysadmins (remember when we were called that!?) had to deal with packaging and deployment in unique ways. Also, we had to monitor the systems to ensure uptime. This included networks, logging, firewall, monitoring, security, etc.
(2/9)
This gave birth to various interesting tools like Jails, VMware, Xen, Zones, z/VM, etc., to host the redundancy and abstraction and Syslog, SNMP, Nagios, NetFlow, etc. to keep it all online. There were whole suites for the deployment of patches and code.
(3/9)
When you buy into the ecosystem from @CloudNativeFdn and the K8 world, you inherit so much of this as a byproduct. In the same way, running Win98 on my Linux machine with @VMware Workstation v1.1 changed my whole outlook on IT, so too does @kubernetesio.
(4/9)
This is all to say that I read a flow of posts online talking about how complex k8 is. That is entirely true, but so is running a small IT infrastructure to keep non-container systems online. Something still has to account for those pesky @NIST and ITIL requirements.
(5/9)
K8 is not perfect. I have noticed sysadmins (DevOps, SRE, ??) have a total lack of understanding of how the underlying stack functions. That abstraction is amazing when it works and black magic when it doesn't. Someone still needs to walk the OSI layers.
(6/9)
Those of us who cut our teeth on those first modern distributed systems and networks need to understand that we have a unique role in guiding this next iteration of tech. It isn't a bad thing to shift the paradigm and look at systems in a new way. Each has pros and cons.
(7/9)
K8 is not the right fit for all orgs, but I also think you shouldn't discount it without evaluating the tooling required in its place. K8 isn't going to solve all your orgs problems, but neither is bare-metal machines. Look at your architecture holistically.
(8/9)
When we distil @Docker and @kubernetesio to simply be a deployment mechanism, we miss the peripheral benefits presented by the ecosystem.
When we see K8 as the silver bullet, we miss all the hard old lessons learned.
Balance!
(9/9)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I landed at @LGAairport yesterday and, for the first time, had a @Tesla@Uber Model 3 I was a bit surprised to see. We lived in Brooklyn and drove a Model 3, and I find the charging infrastructure to be incredibly difficult to deal with. Let alone on a fleet level.
(1/5)
From @plugshare, we can see that the only "true" (120kW+) SuperChargers in the NYC metro are in NJ or @JFKairport. If we lower the limit to 70kW, we get a few more options, but if we think that at 120kW, the bare minimum takes 2+ hours to go from 0-100%, it's daunting.
(2//5)
Which got me thinking, how do you drive an @Uber EV and deal with the NYC traffic flows. It wasn't like my driver was nursing the battery as he shuffled through traffic. When we parted ways, I saw him punch into GPS a charger though he was at 245 miles on the "tank."
In between calls, I decided to go split some wood. I find it incredibly relaxing, and it's a great workout. I was thinking about a conversation I had with a buddy about rural communities energy needs. It is a genuine issue in Michigan.
(1/6)
My "fun" activity of splitting wood is life & death for some communities here in Northern Michigan. I am incredibly fortunate that this a hobby and not required for my family's wellbeing. In all the discussions about energy, I find these communities often overlooked.
In my community, the average salary is 24k/yr. A geothermal install is unfathomable, and propane is at least more amicable to personal cash flow despite rising costs.
Those of you fascinated by the SR71 spy plane know that its retirement is considered part of space assets' proliferation. I found it interesting how @SenMarkKelly's question was answered about space capabilities and C2 during the United States Indo-Pacific Command hearing. (1/8)
I will post the video below, but here is the extract of the back and forth w/@INDOPACOM's Admiral Davidson:
Q: in Jan 2007, China conducted an anti-satellite test against one of their own non-operational weather satellites, with a kinetic kill vehicle.
(2/8)
A: We have to build resiliency into our space apparatus that happens with other space assets. It happens with creating airborne and other terrestrial alternatives to fulfil that. And it changes the calculus in space as well.