I think the collapse of research in Nigerian universities in the wake of the IMF/SAP era is one of the biggest tragedies in our history.

Western funding/academics now dominated research, and research topics were determined by Western, not local interests.
At one point, you had to write something about HIV/AIDS to get research funding, or act a subordinate to some Western researcher.

Oil and gas companies determined the direction of research, they were only interested in limiting their liability for oil spills/environmental issues
The Niger Delta Militancy triggered an inflow of research dollars, as the US still depended heavily on Nigerian crude (this was before the advent of Shale Oil and Gas).

Along came 9/11 and Boko Haram, and millions of dollars went into funding research into "radicalization".
As a rule of thumb, if the Pentagon/National Security Establishment or USAID/International Development Community was interested in your research project, it got funded.

But these two communities have very limited interests - and we can see the results today.
Nigerian politicians also got into the game, they realized that key research funders were more interested in certain regions of Nigeria then other regions - so this was just extra ammunition for Nigeria's endless ethno-religious power struggles.
Today, we can see the limits of that approach over the past four decades. We have foreign scholars who lack a holistic understanding of Nigeria as "Nigeria experts" - and the entire nation is on fire, and we don't have enough research to actually understand what is going on.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Onye Nkuzi

Onye Nkuzi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cchukudebelu

21 Apr
In North Korea, Kim Il Sung handed over to his son, Kim Jong Il, who then handed over to his son, Kim Jong Un, some say with "Chinese support";

But there are many examples in Africa.

1. Omar Bongo to Ali Bongo (Gabon, French support).
2. Gnassingbe Eyadema to Faure Gnassingbe (Togo, French support).
3. Idriss Deby to Mahamat Deby (Chad, French support).

Likely father to son dictator transitions.
1. Paul Biya to Frank Biya (Cameroon, French support)
2. Museveni to Muhoozi Kainerugaba (Uganda, US & UK support)
3. Paul Kagame to Ivan Kagame (Rwanda, US, UK & "international development community" support).
4. Teodoro Obiang Nguema to Teodoro Nguema Obiang (Equatorial Guinea, US support - especially from ExxonMobil and the Oil & Gas Industry).
Read 4 tweets
21 Apr
There are around 840 motor vehicles/1000 people in US. The figures for China were 204 motor vehicles/1000.

In 2019, 21.44 million vehicles were sold in China, compared to 17 million in the US.

If China reaches US levels of car ownership, that's around 80 million vehicles/year.
I think the Chinese Government is a lot more responsible about environmental stewardship than the US Government. In the US, it is about "having as many cars as you want", but Beijing is very deliberate about limiting car sales & is investing heavily in mass transit.
For example, to obtain a license plate to drive an internal combustion engine run vehicle in Shanghai, you'll have to shell out $12,000 - and there's still a queue, but if you purchase an electric vehicle, it is free.

So they are passionate about growing the electric market.
Read 4 tweets
15 Apr
"The Quad".

We've watched this movie before, with the same actors in different roles.

India's relationship with the Soviet Union had a lot more to do with practical geopolitics than ideology.

US was the major backer of Pakistan, its arch rival then.
A Soviet relationship with India, could come in handy in containing China - which was considered a major threat to Moscow.

China, on the other hand, saw Pakistan as a useful tool to contain India (India and China fought a couple of border wars).
US, on the other hand, took advantage of the rift between China and Russia - to support Beijing and further drive a wedge between Moscow and Beijing.

Beijing was very happy to support Pakistan to frustrate the Soviet Union in Afghanistan - and so was Washington.
Read 5 tweets
15 Apr
India and Pakistan.

A tale of two nations.

Pakistan was a strategic partner of the US for several decades, but this relationship was driven by the US National Security Community/Pentagon and the Pakistani Military.
India on the other hand, was more closely aligned with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, but towards the late 1980s, some young Indian software professionals created a software industry in Bangalore - and this drew the attention of Silicon Valley.
If you examine Nigeria carefully, there are elements of "India" and "Pakistan" at play with our present relationship with the US.

The Pentagon/National Security Community is in a relationship with Nigerian Military narrowly focused on Islamic Terrorism (Boko Haram).
Read 5 tweets
13 Apr
"Ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money"

Oliver Cromwell (dismissing the Rump Parliament)

This applies 100% to the Nigerian political elite.
He goes on;

"Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you? Is there one vice you do not possess?

Ye have no more religion than my horse. Gold is your God. Which of you have not bartered your conscience for bribes?".
"Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation. You were deputed here by the people to get grievances redressed, are yourselves become the greatest grievance".
Read 4 tweets
13 Apr
It is easy to figure out where Russia and China stand. They do not support democracy.

But with the West, it is not straight forward. On the one hand, they are opposed Myanmar's Military Junta - but on the other, they give Chad's Idris Deby & Egypt's Al Sisi their full support.
So, with the West, 75 - 80% of the time when they express "their support for democracy", they don't actually mean what they say.

The trick is in identifying the 20 - 25% of the time when they actually mean what they are saying about "democracy" and "human rights".
Now, Nigeria is surrounded by Western supported dictators (Chad, Togo, Cameroon). So, it is reasonable to assume that they have very little support for "democracy" or "human rights" in the West African region.

Let's focus on what they do, not what they say.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!