That so many in the GOP have fallen into #QAnonCult and spew such delusional conspiracy theories is not too surprising. With the election of Obama, GOP politicans/media were willing to say *anything.* Remember FEMA concentration camps? Jade Helm? Agenda 21? Birtherism? There...1
...are STILL GQPrs out there who believe that a Kenyan Muslim served as president and locked up "patriots" in concentration camps while preparing to launch a war on Texas and outlaw cattle and golf courses. That is the crap these people were fed, day in and day out, for years...2
...then you have the alternate reality - where BLM protests were widely violent (they weren't), where looting was explosive (it wasn't), where Jan 6 rioters were peaceful (they weren't.) Tucker KKKarlson yesterday condemned the Chauvin jury for "ignoring the evidence." Unreal...3
...depiction of a case where there was virtually no defense, and just enough of a hook them to hope one person would hang the jury. But no, in imaginary Tucker world, there was tons of evidence supporting Chauvin, and no rational person could think otherwise. GOP lives in...4
...an alternate reality because they are fed an alternate reality 24/7. The QAnon types - who, dont underestimate, pose a terror threat to this country - have had a decade of accepting increasingly crazy ideas peddled by Fox/GOP. They have been primed for it. And now they...5
...believe that there was some massive conspiracy with no evidence that overthrew the election by a bunch of satan worshippers who eat children and drink their blood. The GQP keeps indulging this. The violence will get worse. You cant have a huge portion of the country....6
...that has been deluded by conservative politicians and media, that has now taken that ball of crazy & run with it, spinning it into far more than even Tuckkker would argue, and expect it can be controlled. QAnon is a real threat. And the GOP created it with a decade of lies.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The GQP's worst lie is that they're patriots who stand for liberty. Their philosophy has evolved to "I do what i want and you do what I want." Companies cant make them wear a face mask to protect the community, but they can intervene between parents and MDs in care of a child...1
...blocking disinformation spread on a social media platform against the terms of service is an outrageous 1st Amendment violation, but ending the career of a football player silently protesting violence is being a patriot. To them, patriotism is all about songs and flags...
...and words. It has nothing to do with caring about the country, caring about the community. They waive flags screaming about their patriotism while stomping around spreading COVID because they don't give a damn about their fellow Americans. They are the worst kind of citizen...
I never react to a SCOTUS ruling based on the policy outcome, but read the opinions and precedents involved first. And Kavanaugh's opinion in Jones v Mississippi shows *everything* that's wrong with modern conservative justices. They don't even have the balls to admit when...1
...they are simply throwing out/ignoring precedent to get a policy outcome they want. And they *lie* about it so casually. Its indisputable this ruling overrules the standards of Miller v. Alabama & Montgomery v. Louisiana. Indisputable, excerpt for conservative judges who...2
...are willing to assert something demonstrably untrue as being contained in a precedent - or simply twist underlying facts to get what they want. This tactic was started by Scalia at the end of his career, perfected by Alito - the court's most arrogant liar ever - and now...3
I was viciously criticized when, at indictment, I said the prosecution had overcharged in Trayvon Martin case which would likely result in acquittal. The elements of manslaughter were there, not murder. Now that is widely accepted as the reason Zimmerman got off. Now Fox et al...
...endlessly point to the Zimmerman case as "proof" that these cases often involve whatever name they are calling the black victims that week. That overcharging *set back* the cause of ending this type of racist violence. Trayvon Martin's family never saw justice because of...2
...that overcharging. If the circumstances are ignored, if the rage rightly felt for the unjustified shootings and abuse and false arrests that black people suffer every day is used to say that a case of a justified shooting is one of those, we end up exactly where we did with...
The rage of so many Qpublicanat at Chauvin verdict is not justt about racism but also disappointment that they can’t delight in gleeful cruelty about the protests that would follow the acquittal of a man we all watched murder someone. They don’t sayHOW he wasn’t guilty, just...1
...ignore the fact that there was virtually no evidence in defense, that police officials everywhere condemned Chauvin, that even some heads of police unions - who always defend cops - said this was the right verdict. They rage and rage and rage that the jury only convicted...2
...because they were *scared* of the reaction that might follow the acquittal (an amazing double back-flip of ignoring the evidence in order to condemn actions they so passionately wanted to condemn, and couldnt let it go even when they didn’t happen.)...3
The key problem with @NateSilver538 tweets about J&J withdrawal is that it ignores the requirements of clinical trials and the potential impact of ignoring them, and instead relies on raw statistical analysis. The consequences of doing so could prove disastrous to the entire...1
...system of drug testing/regulation and end the ability for emergency authorization. (Note: I am conveying an expert's analysis, not my own.) The key element here is scientific mechanism. If these six had experienced something for which there was no theoretical mechanism for...2
...the problem (such as being diagnosed with cancer 5 days after the vaccine, something impossible to be linked to vaccine and which would simply be the consequence of large numbers/probabiliy of event) it would be ignored. But the possibility of blood clots does have a...3
I find it bizarre people like @JennaEllisEsq are attacking @ReverendWarnock for discussing the transcendence of the meaning of the Resurrection. (In the process, abandoning part of that meaning.) We discussed this in seminary classes decades ago. Not a new thought. Read this.
...what the critics are doing is taking the primary meaning of the Resurrection - salvation through Christ - and reducing purely to a limited Pauline interpretation, where personal redemption through faith is all there is to it. But in reading the actual *teachings* of Jesus...2
...you find the underlying meaning of "salvation through faith in Christ." If it is reduced to "I believe" and that's it, then there are Nazis in heaven. You cannot separate faith in salvation through Christ from His teachings. Literally, entire classes are taught on the....3