It's official: Biden will commit to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions 50-52% below 2005 levels by the end of the decade. He'll make the commitment at 8am EST today as the virtual climate summit with world leaders kicks off. nytimes.com/live/2021/04/2…
This goal is almost double the commitment the Obama Admin set for 2025 (25-28% below 2005) and requires accelerating the pace of emissions declined observed over the last decade. See below for progress to date (via @rhodium_group). 2030 goal requires ~3,200 MMT CO2 equivalent.
Making this goal a reality will require steep reductions in fossil fuel use across all sectors.
We'd have to virtually eliminate coal from power generation by 2030, ramp up clean sources (to more than double today's share), and cut electricity emissions to 75-80% below 2005.
EV sales & internal combustion vehicles efficiency need to soar. UMD estimated we'd need EV sales to reach 40% of light duty and 15% of medium and heavy by 2030 while the efficiency of gasoline cars and trucks keeps rising.
More would be needed in industry, buildings, land use.
The Biden goal is more ambitious than trajectory in @Princeton Net-Zero America study, which applied straight-line emissions constraint reaching 0 by 2050. That permitted 57% of 2005 in 2030 and 44% of 2005 in 2035, so crossing the 50% mark circa 2032/33.
This is a couple years faster than the Net-Zero America study trajectory. We did not optimize our trajectory, just applied a straight line to 2050. So Biden's 2030 pledge is consistent with the path to net-zero emissions. For more on what that looks like: NetZeroAmerica.princeton.edu
It is important to note that while the changes required to get on path to net-zero are transformative, they are affordable and achievable, we found in the Net-Zero America study. The incremental cost through 2030 is modest (less than 3%) and balanced by health benefits.
Getting on the path to net-zero will mean mobilizing on the order of $2.5 trillion in additional capital investment in clean energy and climate solutions this decade. That's not a cost, it's an investment, paid back over time. Incremental expenditures on energy are <$300b we est.
Finally, for more on the kinds of policies that could mobilize that capital, ensure a just transition and put us on path to net-zero, see @theNASEM report, Accelerating Decarbonization of the U.S Energy System that I was part of: nap.edu/resource/25932…
/End.
PS links to the resources referenced in this thread:
The House is voting to pass the One Big "Beautiful" Bill right now. Here's six key takeaways on what passage means for U.S. energy costs, investment in new electricity supplies, and greenhouse gas emissions. #OBBB
1. The One Big "Beautiful" Bill raises U.S. household and business energy expenditures by $28 billion annually in 2030 and over $50 billion in 2035.
#OBBB
2. The One Big "Beautiful" Bill increases average U.S. household energy costs by roughly $165 per household per year in 2030 and over $280 per household per year in 2035—an increase of about 7.5% in 2030 and over 13% in 2035.
#OBBB
REPEAT Project just completed our rapid analysis of the impacts of the Senate-passed version of the One Big "Beautiful" Bill (#OBBB), which the House is considering now, on the US energy sector and emissions. Still working up full report, but here is a sneak peak... 🧵
Compared to what Trump can do via executive action alone, if the Senate-passed #OBBB becomes law: 1. US greenhouse gas emissions would increase by ~190 million metric tons per year in 2030 & 470 million tons in 2035
Compared to what Trump can do via executive action alone, if the Senate-passed #OBBB becomes law: 2. US households & businesses will spend $28 billion more on energy annually in 2030 and $52 billion more in 2035. 3. The average US household will pay ~$165 more per year on energy bills in 2030 and over $280 per year in 2035.
This is unbelievably bad. I am astonished that the Senate language got WORSE overnight than even the House version. This One Big Horrible Bill will raise energy costs, kill $100s of billions of new investment in energy & manufacturing, make our grid less reliable, increase pollution, and constrain our ability to compete with China for the future or AI. Total loser stuff.
The new Senate draft raises taxes on all wind and solar projects that haven't begun construction today unless they are placed service by end of 2027 and navigate complex, likely unworkable requirements to prove they don't use a drop of Chinese materials. After that, this bill ADDS A NEW tax on wind and solar projects that can't prove the same.
Oh & it does so while killing the tax credits to support domestic manufacturing of wind components at the end of 2027 & adding the same unworkable requirements to the credits supporting US solar & critical minerals. It'll murder our nascent clean energy manufacturing sectors.
Everyone seems to be framing Trump's freeze on federal grants as a Constitutional fight over powers of the purse & whether presidents can disregard Congressional appropriations. It is that. But also at stake is the fundamental validity of govt contracts! I see much less discussion on this... 🧵
Trump isnt just trying to impound appropriated but unobligated funding. He's frozen dispersement of billions of dollars of CONTRACTUALLY OBLIGATED funds. Whatever you think about the validity of impounding unobligated funds, this is quite clearly a direct and widespread violation of contract law. 🧵
While the courts forced Trump's OMB to revoke its across-the-board freeze on ALL federal assistance (grants, loans etc), the White House continues to forbid dispersment of obligated funds for various programs they just dont like, including clean energy, anything that smells of DEI, foreign aid etc 🧵
Vance last night: "We should be making more solar panels here in the United States of America."
Me last night yelling at the TV: THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT AMERICA IS DOING UNDER THE BIDEN-HARRIS ADMINISTRATION (AND EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN VOTED AGAINST THE LAW THAT MADE IT HAPPEN)!!
And it's not just solar panel manufacturing. After decades of politicians like Vance making empty promises to bring manufacturing back to America, WE'RE ACTUALLY DOING IT! Thanks to clean energy & industrial policy laws passed under Biden & Harris.
Just last week, Ohio-based solar PV manufacturer @FirstSolar inaugurated a new $1.1 billion manufacturing facility in Alabama that adds 3.5 gigawatts of fully vertically integrated solar manufacturing capacity in the US. That's ~10% of the US market for solar. madeinalabama.com/2024/09/first-…
Two years ago today, President Biden signed into the law the landmark Inflation Reducation Act, supercharging the clean energy transition.
Today, REPEAT Project releases 'Climate Progress 2024,' our annual update and analysis of US progress on the path to net-zero emissions.
In this 2024 update, we've thoroughly refreshed all assumptions, calibrated near-term constraints against real-world trends & announced investments, and accounted for several federal regulations (EPA emissions rules & DOE efficiency standards) finalized by in the last year.
In todays' Summary Report (available at ), we provide high level results from REPEAT Project’s 2024 Annual U.S. Emissions Pathways Update.
A final report with further detailed findings and an updated data portal with quantitative results will be published soon at .repeatproject.org/reports repeatproject.org