First, Merkel mentions that Europe cannot defend itself by itself,but needs the NATO. Similarly, she says, that Europe must be part of the global supply chains of production. There are problems, like with the current Covid pandemic, where supplies of pharmaceuticals have stopped.
In this context, she mentions India. She says that India became a global pharmaceutical giant, and Europe "let it be" (werden lassen) also from the European point of view, with specific commitments about supplies etc. This is not as bad as "allowed it to" in the translation.
So what should Europe do when its supplies are not met? Merkel says they should "umdenken" (think differently, look for alternatives, other arrangements etc). Ultimately, she returns to her earlier point about promoting European pharmaceutial production (at 3 min in the video).
She then says that developing countries should also be given a chance to join the international trade. It can be argued that there is a slight pejorative sense treating India as a developing country that may not be competitive. But it is not as bad as in that English translation.
The context of the discussion is about European pharma production and whether cooperation between different EU countries was a hurdle during Covid, for procuring medicines etc. Merkel was defending the global integrationist policy (unlike USA-First or UK-First export controls).
Prior, Merkel also explicitly states that it is useless if only one country (say Germany) vaccinates all citizens while other EU states remain unvaccinated, because the virus will definitely mutate and bring everybody to square 1. She also defends EU exports to Latin America etc.
Merkel's argument is a bit similar to this interview by @DrSJaishankar, India's External Affairs Minister, who defended a global cooperation for fighting Covid. There are definitely differences between India and Germany, but not as much as, say with USA.
Anyway, this incident shows how Indian readers getting their news about foreign countries only through English language blogs or media can be a serious problem. The same is true of *news about India* also being filtered through English before it reaches countries like Germany.
There was a lot of outrage by Indian readers on the tweet above, and on tweet below, also referring to that faulty English translation.
It might be a lot of ado about a trifle. Even this is a bit unlike Merkel, who is usually diplomatic in her speehes.
I hope India soon gets its act together and builds an international media presence. Foreign language media must be translated directly into Indian languages. And Indian language news from India translated into foreign languages. English is a liability as a bridge language. (End)
This is silly. No translator can translate just words. He has to translate with the context.
Even then, “lassen” in German would be “let” in English. “Allow” would be “erlauben”. That blogger wrote something quickly and that is further taken out of context by the commentariat.
It is a strange world today, where social media becomes a phenomenon in itself. All talking past each other. Then there is the extra prickliness by the “liberal” elite who keep blocking if someone quote with retweets. So we talk over screenshots, that remove context even further.
The thing is, in that quote by Hugo Gye who popularized that blog article, hé also wondered about this word. Like Chinese Whispers, the meaning is messed up further and further in the comments that follow. 😄
One unintentional weird translation kicks off a chain of confusion.
There is also a point about linguistic differences in how we express a meaning “grow -> let grow”. This confusion may not have arrived if people translated the expression in their mother tongue before outraging.
@avtansa, could you please also comment about this issue?
We cannot have it both ways. There were liberals who wrote opinion pieces about how the pandemic is being used as an erosion of democracy. Would you have supported the centre confiscating health as a subject when India had low Covid cases ? That was when we could have acted.
The fact is this: federalism is bad in pandemics. This had been proved in every place. USA could have avoided so many deaths if it had centralized directives. Europe is still reeling from Covid due to lack of EU level policies for stopping Covid. India’s suffering now is similar.
Even right now, when the situation had become too large to control, the *correct* procedure is to have the centre confiscate the power of the states and enact national level policy on Covid. This will be more effective in fighting the disease. But will we support it?
At the least, patents are an open publication. It is really sad that the vaccines are not open sourced. This is an important service to protecting health across the globe. It should be supported through a global commons. Not profit making endeavors that are closed from scrutiny.
The bad habits from our IT and digital communications market, where the overall cyber health of our infrastructure is left compromised by closed source systems, are being extended to our own health infrastructure.
It is high time that we get our act together.
If we soon don’t have a functional global commons and a dedicated funding to support such health infrastructure, we can be certain that more nastier viruses will appear on the globe, or even developed as bio weapons by rogue actors, and we will remain defenseless against them.
Whatever success India's top institutions got is simply due to the talent aggregation from a vast country. But they are terribly underperforming compared to the size of India. Nehru's policy of destroying Indian languages ensured that they are disconnected from Indian industry.
Why credit Nehru for starting these institutions? Why not the Islamist Maulana Azad who was gifted the role of the Education Minister of India? The Maulana was so scientific that he didn't even have a degree.
Nehru had so much of scientific temper that he pissed off C.V. Raman.
It is ridiculous that Nehru is given laurels for all the hardwork that Indian scientists achieve, despite
* the terribly low funding to higher education
* the terrible government interference in R&D
* the terribly low success in retaining top students within India for research.
There is no universal definition of "religion" (or "faith"). In fact, the various Sampradāyas of India are not faith-based, but practice based. Even the philosophical tenets (like the 8-fold noble path of Buddha) are not "faith based". They are a practice driven by self-inquiry.
Some scholars, like S.N. Balagangadhara argue that even the reconstruction of Indian Sampradāyas as "religion" is problematic. The native word is "Dharma", which is a universal ethic, which is grouped into "Sampradāyas" (traditions) that are not mutually exclusionary.
తంత్రికాజాలశిక్షణ ద్వారా జరిపిన అవకలనచిత్రణం వినియోగించి అతి భారీ త్రివిమరూపనిర్మాణాలను శరవేగంగా చిత్రణం చేయగల ప్రక్రియ ఇది! త్రివిమరూపాలను వస్తువర్ణధర్మాలను సంక్షిప్తపరిచినప్పుడు చిత్రభూమికపై కలుగు లోపాలను కనిష్టీకరించు ఉత్తమసంక్షిప్తాలను ఈ ప్రక్రియ గణిస్తుంది. #విజ్ఞానవిశేషాలు
నిజప్రపంచపు వస్తువుల త్రివిమప్రతిగ్రహణకు ఇటువంటి పద్ధతులు వాడేవాళ్లము. ఇలా కృత్రిమవస్తుచిత్రణకు, అతి భారీ సమరూపాల స్వసిద్ధసరళీకరణకు సంక్షిప్తీకరణకు యంత్రశిక్షణ ప్రక్రియలు ఉపయోగిస్తారని ఊహించలేదు. ఎంత త్వరగా మారిపోతోంది ఈ కాలం! కృత్రిమచిత్రణ పాఠ్యాంశాలను మొత్తం తిరగవ్రాయాలి. 😀
The supposed divergence of Buddhism from Dharma is a cock and bull story manufactured by colonial Indologists. In reality, Buddhism is just one other Sampradāya of Dharma. Once you see this clearly, you will see the scam that separates 500+ million Buddhists from other Dharmics.
The best antidote to the colonial bullshit are the works of Ananda Coomaraswamy. Arguing from fundamental principles, he explains how all the tenets of Buddhism have deep roots in traditional Indic texts. All the symbolism of Buddhism is intertwined with other streams of Dharma.
Obviously, Buddhism is an independent Sampradāya with its own distinctive features. But such is the case with million other Sampradāyas of Dharma, grouped into "Hinduism". Colonial scholars have successfully separated out other streams as well: Divide and Hunt is the policy.