While you gently awake, legislators in Texas are boldly claiming, despite not quite believing, there are six - precisely six - sexes in humans.
People who make laws are using TikTok for their science info.
Your thoughts?
While you gently awake, I am being questioned by my institute about my use of the words ‘male’ and ‘female’.
Apparently, that’s rude.
Discuss.
While you gently awake, young scientists are being trashed on job sites because they ‘wrong think.’ @SwipeWright
Discuss.
Oh, do you know what?
I’m sick of listing stuff, sick of cataloguing, sick of now being a time where there aren’t just a few events but when there are too many to even remember.
Wake up.
At the same time as the NIH, the EU Commission and many others are arguing for sex as a biological variable, the very journals scientists publish in are making disclaimers about sex being vague woo-woo can't quite pin it down.
The ACLU who defended John Scopes are now an ACLU who say that sex is a "politically and socially contingent notion of embodied and expressed identity."
Discuss.
While you gently awake, there are people arguing that women with high testosterone are not women, and men with low testosterone are not men.
Because, hairy lips and boobs, respectively.
Discuss.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Homo = same.
Zygote = of the zygote (fertilised egg).
It means that, for a given DNA sequence, you have the same information on both copies of it. As each copy came from a different parent, it means your parents had the same information as each other.
If you analyse someone’s entire DNA set, you can get a feel for exactly *how closely related* the parents were. The more events where the sequence is the same in both copies = higher degree of relatedness.
For some genetic diseases, you need two ‘bad’ copies of DNA to have the disease. The chances of you having the disease are therefore higher if your parents are related.
“But which of them is male and which is female? They look different with different wing markings, but unless you are a lepidopterist, it is unlikely you know – and if this was a new species no-one would know.”
“So, our knowledge of the sexes of each individual is non-existent. We do however know that one will be male and the other female.”
Considering Sex as a Biological Variable in Basic and Clinical Studies: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement | Endocrine Reviews | Oxford Academic academic.oup.com/edrv/advance-a…
All serious scientific agencies are outlining requirements for clear definitions of sex as it pertains to biology studies.
The Endocrine Society is not the first to make such statements, but this is comprehensive.
Many guidelines, including those from the NIH and the European Commission, demand separation of sex from gender (where the latter is irrelevant in all non-human studies).
The number of people displaying an abject lack of knowledge about the history of colonialism in Africa is frankly mind blowing.
Do you not look at maps? Wonder about languages and town names? Read any books by African writers? About economics? About foreign aid?
Never curious about the various secessions or civil wars? The stripping of mineral resources?
I am no expert, not by a long shot, but how on earth do you avoid it?
I’m not arguing that the average person should have in-depth knowledge. I’m asking how anyone can express surprise at older colonial territory maps and not look phenomenally stupid.
The conformation of external genitalia has extremely reliably permitted sex identification from birth, and increasingly, in utero.
A kid could do it. And get it right almost all the time.
The demand that the world bows to ‘assigned’ is because some people don’t think physical anatomy reflects whatever bonkers idea of ‘sex’ they wish to promote.