If you're wondering why people are still taking to the streets against the #PoliceCrackdownBill, here's what the Gov has in store for the people's right to protest:
[THREAD]
CONDITIONS
Currently a senior police officer can place 3 conditions on a static protest (that stays in one place): 1. place 2. duration 3. number of people
#PoliceCrackdownBill lets the officer place any condition "as appear to him necessary" - a dangerously broad power.
NOISE
The #PoliceCrackdownBill says "noise generated by persons taking part" is a reason for police to impose conditions on a protest if the noise "may result in serious disruption to the activities of an organisation which are carried out in the vicinity".
If it's a static protest (that stays in one place), police can impose conditions if the noise "may have a relevant impact on persons in the vicinity […] and that impact is significant."
That impact could be 'serious unease'.
This is huge.
These changes hide those in power from public criticism, because they can effectively ban protests outside a whole range of powerful institutions (eg Parliament or New Scotland Yard) on the basis of inconvenience or disruption.
"SERIOUS DISRUPTION"
#PoliceCrackdownBill allows the Home Secretary to say what "serious disruption" is.
So the State can change its meaning at will to target the protest of any group it doesn't like.
CRIME TO BREACH CONDITIONS W/O KNOWING IT
#PoliceCrackdownBill will criminalise people who breach a police condition without knowing if they "ought to have known".
In effect, you could be criminalised if the police change conditions on the protest, but you didn't see the tweet.
This places an unfair burden on the organisers of protests to keep everyone in attendance informed and up to date on any conditions the police place on the protest.
And everyone there must also keep themselves up to date.
When people are standing up to power, it's critical their voices can be heard. Banning protest in particular places of power could essentially make protests pointless.
PUBLIC NUISANCE
#PoliceCrackdownBill means that you could commit a public nuisance - and face up to 10 years' imprisonment - by 'obstructing the public’.
Nearly all protests ‘obstruct’ the public in some way – isn't that the whole point?
#PoliceCrackdownBill would create criminal penalties for people who cause 'serious annoyance' - striking at the very heart or protest.
The criminal penalties for causing serious annoyance are up to 10 years in prison.
Even if protest was considered a reasonable defence, it would only be a defence IN COURT.
This will prevent people from taking to the streets and making their voices heard.
Check out our full briefing that was sent to every MP
The #PoliceCrackdown Bill gives police more powers to shut down protest, creates a buffer zone around Parliament, makes 'serious annoyance' punishable by 10 years in prison AND MORE.
Protest isn't a gift from the State. It's our fundamental right
The #PoliceCrackdownBill targets what makes our protest rights meaningful and gives the police even more powers to shut protests down.
Breakdown of this dangerous Bill [THREAD]:
CONDITIONS
Currently a senior police officer can place 3 conditions on a static protest (that stays in one place): 1. place 2. duration 3. number of people
#PoliceCrackdownBill lets the officer place any condition "as appear to him necessary" - a dangerously broad power.
NOISE
The #PoliceCrackdownBill says "noise generated by persons taking part" is a reason for police to impose conditions on a protest if the noise "may result in
serious disruption to the activities of an organisation which are carried out in the vicinity".
🔘Suspends the racist hostile environment
🔘Respects disabled people’s rights
🔘Ensures everyone has safe housing
🔘Makes sure everyone can meet their basic needs
🔘Protects protest rights
🔘Guarantees MPs vote on lockdown restrictions
Protest ban is the latest attempt to limit our rights.
Elite sports = allowed
Schools & unis = open
Film & TV = going ahead
But without justification or explanation, Gov took this chance to ban protest - and within days there were more than 200 arrests. libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/protest-…
Earlier this year, racial justice protesters were kettled. And a trans rights advocacy group cancelled a protest when police said they'd be arrested and fined.
The pandemic is being used as an excuse for crackdown on protest, but it’s not the whole picture.
Last year, the Met unlawfully banned protest across London, and arrested over 1,000 people at Extinction Rebellion demos.
In correspondence with the Home Sec, Met Commissioner said the climate change protests created “opportunities” to limit the right to protest.
We've uncovered new figures showing the Met Police dramatically increased use of the most discriminatory form of stop and search during lockdown. theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/j…
Section 60 orders allow police to stop and search people without any suspicion - a recipe for discrimination.
It's only supposed to be used if there has been violence or when serious violence may occur in a specific area.
Met police issued 65 in May - up from 13 in April.
Black people are almost 10 times more likely to be stopped under regular (so-called section 1) stop and search powers than white people.