Kit Yates Profile picture
Apr 23, 2021 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
A short thread on vaccination data:
Rate of vaccination is starting to pick up again after a dip earlier in April.
It's still majority second doses being given to keep pace with the first doses we gave 12 weeks earlier.
1/7
61% of the UK adult population have now had their first dose and 20% their second dose.
2/7
Wales is still ahead with first doses given, while NI lags behind, but the absolute differences in percentages vaccinated are less than 10%.
The relative difference is bigger in second doses with Wales surging ahead early on, but now being pegged back.
3/7
We're seeing high proportions of over 80s having received their second dose (83%) and 78% of 75-79s too.
First dose coverage is over 90% for everyone over 55.
89% of the 50-54 year-olds have had a first dose and 59% of 45-49s.
4/7
Perhaps one thing to keep an eye on is keeping pace with first dose delivery.
12 weeks ago 80% of over 80s had been given their first dose.
This week 83% of over 80s have been given their second dose.
That margin was 16% last week this week it's just 3%.
5/7
The vaccine programme is still going superbly well.
It is and will continue to make a huge difference, especially as we continue to open up.
It is, however, worth understanding that there are inequalities in vaccine uptake as highlighted in this thread:
With thanks, as ever, to Bob Hawkins with his help in preparing the data.
7/7

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kit Yates

Kit Yates Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Kit_Yates_Maths

Mar 3
Today the Royal Society will meet to discuss “Fellows’ behaviour”. Without doubt the fellow they will primarily be discussing is Elon Musk.
The behaviour may range from his public dissemination of unfounded conspiracy theories to his attacks on the science
🧵
1/38
Musk is also an important figure (some would argue the most important) within a US administration that is laying siege to science and to scientific inquiry itself.
2/38
researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-world-…
The new administration’s executive orders have restricted research, silenced climate scientists and cut funding, as part of a systematic targeting of the scientific community.
3/38

insidehighered.com/news/governmen…
Read 37 tweets
Feb 28
The populist right is damaging US science.

Here's what I think we should be doing to ensure that the UK (and indeed other non-US countries) does not suffer the same fate.

🧵

1/37
The United States is currently witnessing an unprecedented assault on its scientists and scientific institutions, driven by populist agendas that prioritise ideology over evidence.

These orchestrated attacks threaten the foundations...

2/37

aaup.org/report/nationa…
... of evidence-based policy-making and scientific progress. Funding has been slashed, climate research censored, and public health is in jeopardy.

Watching the disaster unfold one step removed, UK scientists must not stand by but instead react to support our US colleagues

3/37
Read 37 tweets
Feb 21
Silence will not shield scientists from the consequences of an increasingly hostile political landscape.

UK and other non-US scientists must act to support our US colleagues.

Here's what I think we should be doing...

🧵

1/35
Science thrives on collaboration and openness.

The people who practice science are committed to seeking truth and combatting falsehoods.

2/35
In an era where political forces increasingly seek to distort, suppress, or co-opt scientific knowledge for ideological purposes, the global scientific community must recognise that staying silent in the face of these challenges is no longer an option.

3/35
Read 35 tweets
Feb 18
Fiona Fox’s recent article in Research Professional News cautions that expelling Elon Musk from the Royal Society could undermine public trust in science.
I disagree...
🧵
1/25
researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-vie…
I think that this perspective overlooks the critical role that scientific institutions play in upholding ethical standards and defending the integrity of science, especially at times when science and scientists are subject to threats and intimidation from political institutions
2
It's imperative that scientists and their representative bodies actively engage in political discourse to protect scientific integrity, particularly when it is under direct threat, as has been clearly evidenced by recent developments in the United States
3
iflscience.com/us-science-is-…
Read 25 tweets
Oct 15, 2024
After hearing some underwhelming testimony last month at the #COVIDInquiry on the use of respirators, @trishgreenhalgh and I decided to write a rapid response to the @bmj_latest to set the record straight.
Here's what we wrote...
1/15
bmj.com/content/386/bm…
"Respirators outperform surgical masks; fit-testing is desirable but not essential"

Professor Susan Hopkins (UK Covid Inquiry, 18th September 2024) claimed that evidence for the superiority of respirators (which are made to an industry standard and designed to fit ...
2/15
closely around the face) over medical facemasks (which are not generally made to any quality standard and often fit loosely, leaving gaps around the sides) is “weak”.
She also claimed that respirators are of little use if they are not fit-tested.
3/15
bmj.com/content/386/bm…
Read 17 tweets
Jun 25, 2024
As the UK’s general election campaign enters its final few weeks, we’ve already seen numerous examples of dodgy declarations, substandard stats and graph gaffs.

So I thought I'd write about the importance of numeracy to the functioning of democracy.
🧵
We can expect to see more questionable claims in the run up to polling day.
The factor that all these all these missteps have in common is that they involve the manipulation or misrepresentation of numerical quantities.
One of the most hotly disputed figures of the campaign so far has been the Conservatives’ claim that Labour’s policies will, as Rishi Sunak put it, “amount to a £2,000 tax rise for everyone”. Labour have rebuffed this figure, arguing that...
theguardian.com/politics/artic…
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(