Today Apr 23 @NatCounterPunch published one of the absolute worst, dishonest examples of genocide denialism I've seen so far. It's by @Alfreddezayas and @rfalk13 and it's worse even than Sachs & Schabas. Despite mountains of evidence, including from Zayas' own UN colleagues,
1/4
1/4
they call the genocide charge against China "evidence-free": Zayas & Falk knowingly insult the wide range of in-office UN experts who've repeatedly expressed deep concern about the evidence, news.un.org/en/story/2021/… - alongside the High Commissioner for Human Rights herself,
2/4
2/4
Mme Bachelet, who has done so on many occasions, starting on her first day in office. reuters.com/article/us-un-…
Because the evidence directly shows racial profiling and racist discrimination behind the oppression,
3/4
Because the evidence directly shows racial profiling and racist discrimination behind the oppression,
3/4
...the UN's agency on racism first sounded the alarm. ishr.ch/news/china-un-…
Since then, a *massive* body of evidence has been amassed on the atrocities.
Zayas and Falk know this...but they're fact-resistant like the worst kind of trumpster: They believe only their master.
4/4
Since then, a *massive* body of evidence has been amassed on the atrocities.
Zayas and Falk know this...but they're fact-resistant like the worst kind of trumpster: They believe only their master.
4/4
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
