Among other things, I write and publish books.

Where I've proved less successful to date - and even been neglectful - is marketing and promoting those books.

I am beginning to see how illogical my thinking on this has been🤦‍♂️

A 'mea culpa' thread 🧵👇
An exchange between @jordanbpeterson and @jockowillink:
'No matter how good your product.. the world will not beat a pathway to your doorway... you need to pay attention to marketing; you can't be contemptuous of it... who the hell is going to buy something they don't know about'
Fair to say the inescapable logic of that hit me like a punch in the face.

Sometimes you need a punch in the face 🥊
When 'Informed' came out in 2018 a colleague in the field (privately) compared it very favourably to a title from another coach that has been wildly successful - stating 'this is the book that ________ ________ should have been'

At the time I took this as a compliment...
On reflection, if it is true that 'Informed' was such a superior book then the fact that the other title outsold it by perhaps 100x needs to be accounted for in some other way.

Timing and good fortune aside, the discrepancy suggests I did a horrible job of reaching the audience
.@jordanbpeterson again from the same conversation:
'People allow a casual and unconscious contempt to allow them the luxury of not having to consider the importance of all the things they are not doing'
I freely and openly admit that the promotion and marketing aspect is what I have the least affinity for - and is also the part that I am least adept at (those two things likely being related).
I am acutely aware there is no shortage of shameless self-promotion and snake oil salespeople in the field.

But in my caution to avoid being seen as that I have tended to do a half-hearted job of promoting the books and at times opted out entirely.
What is less excusable is that I have viewed this as some sort of virtue rather than a failing.

'it is more comfortable in some sense to have contempt for things... that casual contempt for what you can't do is a real ethical mistake'

Another 🥊 from @jordanbpeterson
Feedback from friends and colleagues who I respect highly suggest that the books have genuine value for coaches, practitioners and students in the field.

Also why write books if nobody gets to read them.

So failing to do the work to reach the audience doesn't serve anybody
The puzzle of handling promotion in a way that doesn't sacrifice integrity is something I continue to grapple with.

But it is worth investing the time and continue to grapple with figuring it out.

Perhaps time to get over myself.

Link to the titles:
amazon.com/Paul-Gamble/e/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Informed Practitioner in Sport

Informed Practitioner in Sport Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @InformedinSport

13 Jan
"We (should) only care about discovering the truth; we shouldn't care ahead of time which truth it is... if we want something to be true and not something else then we pay attention to evidence which favours that theory and discount evidence that doesn't" @seanmcarroll
🧵👇
Describes a huge problem in sports science/sports medicine that is endemic in the social sciences.

There should be no 'proposing a theory'.
(For one thing scientific method states that we can only begin with a hypothesis or an observation.

It only attains theory status once it has been validated with experimentation and repeatedly shown to predict what happens in reality.)
Read 11 tweets
11 Jan
The point of debate is not to win, or necessarily agree fully with the other party at the end.

It doesn’t need to be adversarial and the objective doesn’t have to be arriving at consensus

🧵👇
The purpose of engaging in debate is articulating our perspective on the topic, presenting the rationale for our position.

The value comes from hearing the other side’s perspective, getting their insight and considering their arguments to stimulate thoughts and update our model
We can share less than 100% agreement and still be okay.

It is even possible to hold completely different views and still respect (or even like) the other party 🤯
Read 6 tweets
7 Jan
Greater humility is warranted when we consider where true expertise resides and where the meaningful insights that move things forward come from.

Spoiler: academic research rarely drives cutting edge practice.

Empirical study is not restricted to the research setting
🧵👇 1/6
The most meaningful work that leads to discovery is often done in the field.

To use the example of injury rehab/return to sport, there is a lag between what is studied in research and practices at elite level that are pushing the boundaries and advancing our understanding 2/6
Moving beyond sport, the inventions and innovations that lead to scientific discovery most often come from the field.

Academic research generally follows (and serves an important function in validating discoveries and practices in the field) more than it leads 3/6
Read 6 tweets
6 Jan
Those of us involved in academic research might benefit from humility in considering where true expertise resides and where the meaningful insights that move things forward come from.
Empirical study is not restricted to the research setting
(mini thread)
The most meaningful work that leads to discovery is often done in the field.

To use the example of injury rehab/return to sport, there is a lag between what is studied in research and practices at elite level that are pushing the boundaries and advancing our understanding 2/5
Moving beyond sport, the inventions and innovations that lead to scientific discovery most often come from the field.

Academic research generally follows (and serves an important function in validating discoveries and practices in the field) more than it leads 3/5
Read 6 tweets
5 Jan
The role of arm action during running tends to be minimised or dismissed entirely, largely based on biomechanical modelling data.

Perhaps we are missing the point. The contribution of upper limbs to lower limb action during flight and stance go beyond what modelling captures 1/5
Coordination of bipedal locomotion (upright walking, running, sprinting) modes still involves all four limbs!

'During bipedal locomotor activities, humans use elements of quadrupedal neuronal limb control'

Link to the full read: link.springer.com/article/10.100… 2/5 Image
Coaching wisdom shared by two of the best track and field coaches I have encountered describes how hip communicates to shoulder, elbow speaks to knee, ankle talks to wrist

(credit to @PfaffSC @fuzzcoaching respectively for those insights)
3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!