2/ For years, fintechs and banks have been in a battle over access and control of consumer financial data, but an uneasy détente between banks, fintechs, and aggregators has mostly given fintech consumers the illusion of control.
3/ But banks have often threatened to revoke this access, and because fintechs often get it through 'scraping' using their own credentials -- many fintechs use this access to pull data daily or more
4/ The rhetoric in response has been eerily uniform -- with all parties saluting the notion of consumer ownership of data. Taking the notion of consumer ownership seriously, however, is more difficult than it appears.
5/ Looking at the UK, their initial roll out of open banking was marred by the erection of Rube-Goldberg processes to actually GET access.
6/ The UK government had to charter a public-private entity to be a clearinghouse for open banking data. The CFPB's decade-long delay -- NOT great -- but at least we have a chance to learn from others.
7/ Most importantly the CFPB has the ability to go beyond simple access and address consumer disclosure AND CONTROL through the life of a financial relationship.
8/ We suggest looking at the famous "Schumer box" for credit cards -- but this time, let's make it INTERACTIVE -- on each point of disclosure, consumers should have an easy way to express their preferences and change the use of data by the financial institution
9/ The CFPB can also push the boundaries by looking at new technologies that enable: attestation based disclosures, privacy protective machine learning, or opportunities for consumers to monetize their data as it's used [QED has investments in these areas]
Henry Ford probably never said “If I had asked people what they wanted,
they would have said faster horses.” hbr.org/2011/08/henry-…
But it really is true that people thought cars were just a scary fad.
When @matheusriolfi started to take @turo international he faced a similar problem ... car-sharing with strangers didn't just need insurance for legal reasons, but because the whole customer experience was untested and new.
TLDR: we are experiencing mass civil disobedience on financial regulation, which is very unusual, but not innovative.
Every generation has taken old ideas and dressed them up in new language. Lowering cost by circumventing regulation is an age-old strategy.
Some crypto players don't want to comply -- that's fine for them.
Enforcement resources are stretched thin and so, many, especially smaller ones, may never face penalties. But that's a strange way to build anything of scale or importance.
There’s an old truism that “financial services is a highly regulated industry.” This truism is also true.
2/ APIs are everywhere, every SaaS company must turn into an API-first company to survive. For the last 6 weeks we’ve laid out a guide for the next generation of SaaS built on the foundations of API-first development.
3/ What does it mean for the next generation of fintechs to be powered by API-first companies?
First it means that the barriers to entry are going to go down for consumer facing and small business companies.