@CouldntBRighter Oh no, you've got it all wrong. To have a "big cause" you have to have a certain psychological type. It's the kind of person most likely to join cults.



This is always at odds with people who don't fall for causes.
@CouldntBRighter Usually it's a fanatical elite vs. the non-causey masses who just want to grill. In the Axis states, the "causey" people fell into the "cause" of their nation. That is, the nation became the cause. Think SS (core, later they became a way for non-Germans to join the army).
@CouldntBRighter But what has happened is the causey people, who usually just lose over time, have brought in foreign nations. And so you have nationalisms pitted against each other in the US - black, white, various browns - and so the nationalisms can't form a unified front against the cultists
@CouldntBRighter "White supremacy" gins up two groups: ALL causey/culty people, and non-white defaults (nationalists, fascists).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with FREESOIL 🇮🇱

FREESOIL 🇮🇱 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Freesoilyeah

25 Apr
@CouldntBRighter Ofc you can use whatever words you want, and I'll do my best to understand what you mean. But more timeless terms would be "default" and "causey".

In terms of "authoritarian", that's kinda vague. Default PEOPLE are certainly less controlling on an interpersonal level.
@CouldntBRighter If you're talking about state systems controlling people, that is only a result of causey people.

In Nazi Germany, you had a situation where the "big cause" WAS default.

In the USSR, the "big cause" was contra default. And in most of history, the big cause is contra-default.
@CouldntBRighter That is why Hitler had so much more unity than Stalin and didn't need to have purges - the causey types and default types in Germany were all on the same page. Obviously every individual falls on a spectrum, and their genetic tendencies can be inflamed or suppressed.
Read 6 tweets
23 Apr
@patowan @Alt1987er @ArtyomLukin Okay, clusters with sometimes hard and sometimes fuzzy boundaries with varying degrees of mixture that are often called "populations" or "haplogroups" but are absolutely NOT RACES despite having identical delineations as the old races.
@patowan @Alt1987er @ArtyomLukin But lets start with some boundaries: do you think a population which is 50% downs syndrome and 50% not-downs syndrome, is going to be "stronger" than one which is 100% not-downs syndrome?
@patowan @Alt1987er @ArtyomLukin I'm going to assume you'd say the zero downs syndrome population is better off. We'll bypass any shifting or reframing because we know your answer is "no" and there's no significant audience to this conversation. So that sets limit on the benefit of genetic diversity.
Read 6 tweets
17 Apr
@moon_overmiami @DrDenaT @KBoomhauer @Me2S3M It's one unhappy aspect, but in general, white people who have less positive views of other races have lower neuroticism, depression and suicide. So in general they're happier. That doesn't necessarily mean I'm generally happy, but I will tell you I am.
@moon_overmiami @DrDenaT @KBoomhauer @Me2S3M Also in experiments on interaction, whites who have more negative views of other races (implicit association and explicit statement) are rated as being warmer, more likely to initiate contact, and sit ever so slightly closer to people of other races when talking.
@moon_overmiami @DrDenaT @KBoomhauer @Me2S3M So in terms of being "cold" to brown people, it's literally the opposite. This kinda makes sense as whites with lower views of brown people tend to have lived around them more, and so they (you?) aren't foreign or imagined to have super-strength.
Read 4 tweets
17 Apr
@moon_overmiami Sure but that means closed borders. And for the United States, that means massive racial partitions and forced population transfers (like India in 1948).

That means first telling people it's okay to want a country for their people, to not demonize it into thinking they have to..
@moon_overmiami .. be "americans" (whatever the fuck that means). If a Somali muslim can be an "american", then the term is meaningless.

Your home is defined by exclusion. If anyone can enter your home, then it's not really your home. Same with a home-land. If any foreigner can come in and vote
@moon_overmiami then you don't actually have a country. You exist in some sort of polyglot construct. That's why white americans are actually a stateless people - like the Kurds. We have no representation, any attempt at it becomes "white supremacy". Any attempt to escape is "segregation".
Read 4 tweets
14 Apr
Looking more deeply at some IQ results, something that pops out at me that should be important is "point of failure". For example in "progressive martices", it's called that because the questions get progressively harder. But what I notice when I take them, and the data seems...
... to bear this out is that there is a "point of failure". Basically the point in the test that a person, more or less, just stops being able to make sense of any question and answer in any meaningful way.

And I suspect this "point of failure" is more meaningful than overall...
... score. Intuitively, it seems really uninteresting how "efficient" they are in the band of questions they can answer. That seems more like type-A, diligence sort of thing. IRL, you can, through effort, grind out those kinds of questions. But a meaningful intelligence test...
Read 14 tweets
8 Apr
China has masculinity programs, it's common knowledge there that Jews run america, and they aggressively contain the few blacks that live there.

Meanwhile, they promote a the whole anti-white oppression narrative in the US. It reminds me of how Poland-Lithuania was destroyed.
Austria & Prussia would engage in modernizing reforms in their own countries on land rights, freedom of profession and meritocracy. The PLC had elections (nobles could vote) for their Monarch, and they bribed the electors to vote for a monarch who would keep the PLC backward.
Meanwhile China is promoting in the US the elimination of meritocracy and transferring power from the most capable to the least capable. From the best to the worst, and funding to galvanize all manner of imagined grievance. While doing the opposite in China.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!