Why do we count the flu by calendar year, but the covid19 since 2019? Because the flu is endemic, happening every year. Outbreaks and pandemics are temporary, so treated as a single event even if it crosses multiple years.
Yes, yes, precise numbers are difficult because sometimes sometimes hospitals are encouraged to count things as covid19 related that may not be. But excess deaths gives us a solid numbers comparable across countries.
No, that article you linked to claiming to debunk the "excess deaths" number is completely bogus. They massaged the numbers to avoid seeing the obvious peak above.
No, that "pre-existing conditions" argument is bogus. it misunderstands how death certificates are filled out, and how the CDC reports those numbers. Again, the "excess deaths" graph debunks it.
You misunderstand the "vaccine 95% effective". It's nearly 100% effective -- even if you get the covid, you won't get a severe case that damages lungs and organs. Conversely, your chance of EVENTUALLY getting the covid is probably more than 50%.
Ignore the death rate. Yes, it's primarily fat old people who die from it, so if you aren't one, you probably won't die.
But there's like a 30% chance if you survive you'll get lifelong lung and organ damage that will affect you for the rest of your life.
You should be scared of the covid not because it'll kill you, but because it'll damage you severely. For every person who's died there's 2 people with lingering effects months later.
Again, the "no more deaths than the flu" argument is debunked by the clear and unambiguous "excess deaths" graph.
BTW, if you think the CDC is lying, then pick another country. Excess deaths spikes almost everywhere (except countries that contained the outbreak).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sure, you have a channel on #americanpolitics, but how do you handle it when one person claims to shoot guns at the range every weekend, then several others complain to HR how they now feel unsafe at work.
Basecamp's solution to political toxicity was to discourage such discussion at work. Asana doesn't say how they deal with toxicity. Sure, they have spaces for politics, but they still haven't say how you handle it when it bleeds over to work. world.hey.com/jason/changes-…
Apparently the latest crazy conspiracy theory is that vaccinated individuals can harm the unvaccinated because they cough up evil proteins or something.
No, it's not how things work. The only animals with dangerous proteins are venomous snakes and spiders.
Well, yes, in 2000, Microsoft web servers were scalable and Linux servers weren't. It wasn't until a few years later that Linux added NAPI (scalable Ethernet drivers) and 'epoll()' (scalable TCP stack).
Microsoft already coalesced interrupts with NDIS and scaled TCP with IOC.
Today, Linux is ahead of Windows on scalability with thinks like DPDK. But in 2000, Linux was a fucking cult, because techies are far less technical than they claim and don't understand things like "interrupt coalescing".
BlackICE Guard (the first IPS) had user-space drivers on both Windows and Linux that handled it's own network stack, meaning, 99% of the CPU power was in BlackICE and not the operating-system, and people still told me "Linux would be faster".
I still haven't delved into WhatsApp code enough, but I suspect there is a flaw that the app leaks the SHA256 hash of the unencrypted multimedia content to Facebook.
This means they still can't decrypt the content. But, if they have a copy of the multimedia thing being shared, then they could in theory know that you shared it.
Thus, if 'chatty rat' sent an image/video with a distinctive hash, they could ask Facebook for who sent that hash.
This would be great way of catching child pornographers without actually being able to decrypt anything, for example, while generally preserving most privacy.
We are not morons.
99% of the people getting vaccines do not know how they work, they aren't "smart".
Instead of intelligence they simply have faith in their leaders. Yes, some leaders are often failing their followers, but both sides kinda suck at that.
No, it's not "listen to the scientists". Scientists get corrupted by politics like everyone else. The science is much more equivocal than people think. People aren't reading the science or listening to scientists -- they are listening to their political leaders claims of science.
People have legitimate and reasonable questions. For example, a friend gets stuck in bed for 3 days after a vaccine, which makes them worry. Nobody answers their concerns-- all they get is toxic responses "SHUT THE FUCK UP AND GET A VACCINE MORON".