A perfect example of physicians being left out of the conversation when it involves healthcare. These fools are intent on making docs obsolete in the provision of rural health care. Invisible. By intent. No doctor on this list. innovation.cms.gov/innovation-mod…
2)Health insurance executives are well-represented. Right at the top. Now take a look at the "hospital representatives". Not one f***ing physician anywhere. One RN. One CRNP. No physician. Let me reiterate for those in the back...HOSPITAL REPRESENTATION, health.pa.gov/topics/Health-…
3)WITHOUT PHYSICIAN REPRESENTATION. This is how non-medical entities control the narrative of health care. So for the docs who keep yapping that this "is the way medicine is going" have relinquished their position in the driver's seat. I'm not one of those docs. Medicine is our
4)domain. How is it possible to have a conversation that involves strategic planning in the purveyance of health care while addressing the financial and demographic challenges w/o involving a CMO? Welp, they had it. "The Pennsylvania Rural Health Model is an alternative payment
5)model designed to address the financial challenges faced by rural hospitals by transitioning them from fee-for-service to global budget payments. This model aligns incentives for providers to deliver value-based care and provides an opportunity for rural hospitals to transform
6)the care they deliver to better meet community health needs." Hmmph. Deliver value-based care my a**. Basically, when all is said and done, they will just tell physicians what their role is. After the fact. Docs are left out of the equation because we will speak on behalf of
7)the patients. Forcefully if necessary. They can't have that. Pennsylvania docs at the listed hospitals, put this on your radar and say something. Do something. Contact the Rural Health Redesign Center Authority(RHRCA), who is tasked with administering the Rural Health Model in
The attached commentary is from Reddit(reddit.com/r/Residency/co…). I will be the first to admit that medicine would not be going into the toilet w/o the assistance of irresponsible or lax physicians expediting the process. This MS1 documents their experience with seeing a
2)"Rheumatology NP" in a clinic "supervised" from a distance by a Rheumatologist. NP diagnosed the student with scleroderma--who knows how or why. Fortunately, the MS1 had a fabulous PC physician who advocated for them and found the student an actual Rheumatologist who diagnosed
3)and treated the student accordingly. Knowing that there is no actual ACCREDITED NP curriculum for rheumatology that exists, I decided to see if there was anything that could pass for rheumatology NP "education" and lo and behold, there was. An online curriculum(of course)
So this is the response from Envision's CEO to the hubbub that occurred a couple of weeks ago regarding their dismissal of anesthesiologists from WRMC in Wisconsin. It reads as one would expect..I'll leave it at that. He states that "physicians" were not replaced by CRNAs. No one
2)claimed that--I will be more specific and reiterate ANESTHESIOLOGISTS were terminated from WRMC and replaced. And they were not replaced by air. How do I know? Look at the original letter that states they are going to a "100% CRNA model". If they were using CRNAs in this model
3)before, then why was it necessary to make the announcement in the first place? In addition, a lead CRNA will be managing anesthesia services. Not an anesthesiologist. Also note in the letter the statement, "An Envision anesthesiologist will be on staff at this hospital and will
Welp, EM docs, it's happening...With CMGs opening their own EM residencies, the proliferation of NPP "residencies" and "fellowships" and ignoring the warning by the American Academy of Emergency Physicians(AAEM) in 2016 about the threat of an oversupply of EPs, we finally did it.
2)Created a glut. We already knew compensation was dropping. We witnessed all the EPs being terminated in favor of NPPs who were perceived as saving costs and increasing revenue. IMO, the CMGs developed their own programs for two reasons:
-To control physicians whom they would
3)would train to prioritize metrics and thus increase revenue(thereby engaging in the illegal practice of medicine).
-They needed medical licenses for liability purposes so as not to incur full ownership of NPP malpractice/negligence that would occur because of our failure to
Most of you who follow me know that I use Twitter to educate and inform. My thread regarding the firing of anesthesiologists at Watertown Regional Medical Center was published in Medscape. There were at least three other Twitter posts on the same topic--apparently mine resonated.
2)The irony is I was actually condemning corporate medicine. The WRMC/Envision decision was not in the best interest of the public. I think corporations should stay the hell out of medicine. Nevertheless, over-sensitive CRNAs and virtue-signaling docs deduced that I was
3)criticizing CRNA practice. I happen to believe that the safest model of practice if one cannot have a 100% anesthesiologist model, is a model in which CRNAs are supervised by anesthesiologists. In addition, I take issue with any CRNAs who claim to practice EXACTLY as
@CNotlof Thank you for your sentiments, greatly appreciated. Before I answer your question, allow me to give you the perspective from which my opinion arises. I am a descendant of people who were lynched, blinded, mutilated, etc. for daring to learn to read and write. But they learned
@CNotlof 2)anyway. One of the greatest orators of all time, and a former slave, Frederick Douglass, believed that the ability to read and write was the first step to freedom. That history enabled me to be where I am today. I was able to expound on my literacy skills to become what I
@CNotlof 3)chose, which was a physician. I began lecturing on the value of education while still in college. I never took my education for granted, I viewed it as a gift provided by those who came before. My parents sacrificed a great deal to move us into a neighborhood where Blacks were
There is a misperception that Physicians for Patient Protection(PPP) only advocates for or opposes scope creep issues related to NPs/PAs. Nope. We oppose anyone attempting to practice medicine w/o a license. Attached is info on pending or active legislation in almost every state
2)regarding CRNAs, CNMs, naturopaths, , pharmacists, optometrists, psychologists, etc. It's exhausting. We do this because we have to. Because it is in the best interest of the public. We inform the public so they also know and can protect themselves against people practicing
3)beyond their scope. An informed patient is an empowered patient. We don't have lobbyists, who are incredibly expensive, so we do the legwork ourselves. We volunteer our time willingly--it is essential to our mission, which is to protect patients and the integrity of the