Read literally two paragraphs after the quoted excerpt.
As I keep pointing out:
"Ultra" leftists are literally just anarchists, the exact kind of Utopian Socialists that Engels is denouncing in this exact work. marxists.org/archive/marx/wβ¦
It was literally invented by McKenzie Wark, radlib academic that teaches at the anti-communist "New School" in NYC, author of radlib works like "Gamer Theory" and "A Hacker Manifesto."
Some people are taken aback that I call the New School anti-communist.
I use the word in the sense used by Michael Parenti in "Left Anticommunism: the unkindest cut," of utopian western "socialists" building careers out of denouncing Stalin and China. greanvillepost.com/2018/10/06/lefβ¦
I'm looking at the Wikiquote page for Deng Xiaoping.
There's only a handful of quotes! Let's see how they aged.
"It doesn't matter whether the cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice." (1977)
Definitely a classic. Not much to say here.
"The United States brags about its political system, but the [American] President says one thing during the election, something else when he takes office, something else at midterm and something else when he leaves." (1987)
Every newcomer to Marxism and communist history needs to understand that many of the current "gatekeepers" of Marxism in the West β historians, professors, and university students β are completely worthless careerists.
Check out this garbage on Wikipedia by Tristram Hunt:
Marxism, or whatever else we call it, simply doesn't belong to these ghouls. It never has and it never will.
If you work β if you don't live off of rents β Marx and Engels and others were writing for *you*, and you don't need these anti-communist "interpreters."
People like Hunt and Bessner go around embedding themselves into the conversation as middle-men, as ventriloquists and sheepdogs.
They de-fang the work or, worse, use it to smash international solidarity.
They are, frankly speaking, vicious counter-revolutionary pieces of shit.
Some people seem to believe that the US wouldn't dress up right wing propaganda points in Marxist terminology to push them onto communist circles, as if it a magic spell stopped them from lying this way.
Why? What's the logic here?
There's this strange reticence, as if someone writing down "capitalism bad" was a binding covenant, after which everything else written had to be sincere.
As if being a communist had magical properties one simply couldn't lie about (unless Chinese).
A slew of radlibs has tried to defend Byler on the basis that they absolutely love what he wrote for Chuang.
Can someone explain to me the appeal of regurgitating Falun Gong propaganda like this?