As I leave the coaching world and many others are applying for instructional coaching positions, I want to pass along questions I wish I had asked before accepting a coaching position because the culture, context, and support for coaching will make or break things.
1/
Question 1: "What is your vision of meaningful, high-quality instruction?"
If they struggle to answer this question, it means it's not a priority. Watch to see if they can agree on it, if they have resources, etc. If so, it means they've prioritized it already.
2/
Question 2: "How are teachers currently encouraged to engage in walkthroughs or observe each other?"
This will tell you a lot about the culture and trust that already exists. If this isn't actively created, getting into classrooms will be incredibly difficult.
3/
Question 3: "Can you describe the professional learning plan you use, maybe specifically focusing on teacher ownership of it?"
It is crucial that there is already a positive association with professional learning, and an understanding that PD is more than sit-and-get.
4/
Question 4: "What work has informed how you and your team view instructional coaches and their role in a school?"
Many schools won't have an answer for this, and be wary of that. Admin understanding and support for the role is a crucial element.
5/
There are many more, but in my reflecting on why instructional coaching wasn't a role I necessarily loved, these are some of the big ones.
Lastly, for those pursuing instructional coaching as a stepping stone for something else, please don't. Do it because you love...
6/
Teaching and learning and want to help spur that love in other people, not because you want the power and prestige that people think comes with coaching.
Because here's the truth: no one cares about positional power, and if you're given positional power with that...
7/
Context and culture you need to be successful as a coach, you'll find yourself feeling like you're wasting time, like you're constantly frustrated, and like you're just being paid to be a placeholder.
Nobody wants that.
It can be incredible, but enter cautiously.
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The push for minimum grading (ie. - giving 50% instead of 0 for missing work) often creates friction in a staff because it isn't approached correctly. It's a stop-gap solution for a bigger problem that's never truly addressed.
A thread...
1/8
It's a solution to keep a student from experiencing catastrophic failure, meaning the significant impact of a single score on the student's possibility for success.
If I miss one assignment, I have to get two 90% scores just to get up above passing.
2/8
However, in reality what it does is allow a school or district to continue embracing harmful methods of calculating grades while simply mitigating the harm. This is why I don't like grade minimums. It keeps the harmful context and minimally protects students.
3/8
I used to get stuck in a trap of only assessing student writing through larger pieces. While we still do write bigger pieces, I don't put all my eggs in one basket anymore. For one, a missing larger piece ended up being a catastrophe for the student.
Here's what I do now.
1/
Big picture: I collect as many data points as I can to help me paint a picture of each student's understanding.
While I used to only focus on the end product, now I assess different levels.
I lean on tech and some auto-grading to minimize the burden.
2/
To start off, target the skill you're focusing on. We're currently focused on body paragraphs, specifically thinking about structure in our writing.
To start, I usually have an EdPuzzle video with a combo of multiple choice and short response questions. This helps me...
3/
Hear me out: an interdisciplinary superhero class that blends ELA, science, engineering, and art.
ELA: Well, this is easy. Comics/films as texts, analyzing and comparing essays about superheroes and culture, creating their own stories, crafting their own essays/podcasts/etc. about superheroes.
Science ideas (from a non-science teacher): Genes and genetics, environments (new worlds), physics, etc.
Today I surveyed a group of students (couldn't be my own because they already know how much I hate grades) and asked them three questions.
A thread...
1/
The first question was simple.
Do grades help you learn? Why or why not?
Here are some of the responses:
2/
The most concerning ones started with a yes. For example:
"Yes because I feel pressured to do better."
"Yes because if i have bad grades it makes me do work to keep them up."
"To me yes because I feel that I'm doing good in all my classes when I get good grades."
3/
Alternatives to grade penalties for deadlines in what is sure to be a long thread because our enforcement of deadlines is woven into our foundational understanding of assessment, pedagogy, and school in general.
I'll try because I want to help, if I can.
Thread...
1/
First, separate your assignments into essential (think big, important projects) and non-essential (the smaller checks for a standard). This is crucial in managing your workload. Let's start with the smaller, non-essential pieces.
2/
I don't let my students turn in these smaller non-essential pieces late, but it doesn't hurt their grade in the end. I give a minimum of three of these non-essential checks for each standard. If a student misses one, I don't care, but I collect data on it.
3/
I start conversations about text structure with short films, and the three that have really worked well are "Connect" by Samuel Abrahams, "Room 8" by James Griffiths, and "Reflection" by Anthony Khaseria.
I'm always looking for more. Anyone have recommendations?
Here's "Connect" (I always launch this with a notice about gun violence):