For real though, happy lesbian visibility day. A while back I did a blog interview series about LGBT computer science researchers. Eventually my life got too hard to continue it. But here's an interview with Deb Agarwal from back in the day.

theidentityfunction.wordpress.com/2016/12/09/deb…
If anyone wants to take over this project and start it up again, I'd be happy to pass along the knowledge I gained in the process, and give you access and so on.
Back then I really felt that there was a Don't Ask, Don't Tell culture in CS research. When I got the NSF Fellowship, suddenly people knew I existed, and I immediately decided to use this to try to fight that culture. I don't know how much it helped, but I really hope it did.
I do feel that now as I'm about to graduate, the culture has shifted, whether or not I had any involvement in that. I am very happy that is true, and people no longer seem to see being LGBT as a "personal thing" we shouldn't ever talk about in professional contexts
The design of this blog was pretty intentional: fighting taboos by mixing discussion of research with discussion of what it's like to be LGBT as a CS researcher. This idea ought to generalize to other taboos worth smashing, like those around mental health and other disabilities.
So if you want to smash a taboo that harms the community, I hope this blog also serves as a model for one way to go about doing that. I'm happy to help you get started on an interview series about whatever taboo you want to smash (if I agree with smashing the taboo).
The intro post talks a bit about the importance of visibility, though do note that it uses some outdated language and notions from a very different time (which is in itself wonderful to be able to say): theidentityfunction.wordpress.com/2016/04/11/wha…
Oh I should note my life eventually got less hard, just I went through two really painful years that made it impossible to do something like this. Now it feels like digging up bad memories to resume. But I'd really love other people to take over, or learn from my efforts.
Also, at every point in my career at which I've gained some privilege or visibility, I've been extremely deliberate about using it to improve the community in a way I would have been afraid or unable to before. This was the first such effort---I hope to continue that pattern.
In the end, not everyone has the privilege to be able to be visible. But that just makes it extra important for those of us who do and who feel comfortable to be as visible as possible. (Hi, I'm still bi.) 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Talia Ringer

Talia Ringer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TaliaRinger

28 Apr
It still confuses me that in spaces in which humans can often generalize from just 2 or 3 examples, it's considered successful when a software system does so from millions of examples
Nevermind robustness issues
It's true that, you know, reading the entire internet is something that computers can do better than us. But why should they have to? I feel like the metric for success is just wild
Read 13 tweets
27 Apr
On the "we" versus "I" debate about my thesis, I ended up going with this:

- "I" for things I did,
- "we" for mathematical handholding, and
- "Nate" and "RanDair" and so on for things my coauthors did.

Nonstandard I guess, but I deliberately designed projects to decouple work.
So it is actually very easy to point to the parts that my coauthors did. And for the things that we really did design together, I will add a note about this in an early section at the end of the introduction, along with complete authorship statements.
I'm going to use the knowledge package that @16kbps recommended to introduce those authors and link back to the full authorship statements when I mention their names in later chapters. Credit is extremely important!!!
Read 5 tweets
27 Apr
Oh man so I bought three books on the power dynamics of philanthropy, but hilariously, I accidentally bought "Winner Takes All" (a trashy high school romance novel) rather than "Winners Take All" (a scalding critique of the upper class and capitalism run wild). Oops
Time to find one of those little free libraries to drop the trashy high school romance novel
Definitely not a critique of the upper class hahahahaha Image
Read 5 tweets
27 Apr
- give them pandemic-safe in person social interaction activities; stop pretending Zoom is a substitute

- prioritize people with severe depression in vaccination queues

- fund them for an extra year

- help them find group housing

- create more flexible deadline systems
- help them navigate job insecurity

- provide resources for dealing with grief

- provide confidential advocates for the upswing in harassment
- normalize taking about mental illness

- normalize talking about medication

- stop pretending therapy and wellness will fix everything

- recognize that when this many people are depressed, it means SYSTEMS are broken
Read 15 tweets
27 Apr
Writing my thesis, I'm just baffled by how well I subsumed my own work. The PUMPKIN Pi paper (arxiv.org/abs/2010.00774, PLDI 2021) completely subsumes DEVOID (dependenttyp.es/pdf/ornpaper.p…, ITP 2019). DEVOID just ends up being an example in my thesis. I'd be mad if anyone else did this.
Perhaps even more amusingly, in December 2019, I had the idea for PUMPKIN Pi, but also thought it was something I'd never be able to do without help from external experts. I didn't really do it deliberately in the end, either, so I'm surprised it happened at all.
Here's what I sent my advisor in December 2019 Image
Read 5 tweets
26 Apr
Alternatives to "due to space constraints":

- "for historical reasons"
- "due to author laziness"
- "due to author exhaustion"
- "due to an awful pandemic"
- "for confidential reasons"
- "because I feel like it"
- "thanks to procrastination"
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!