For real though, happy lesbian visibility day. A while back I did a blog interview series about LGBT computer science researchers. Eventually my life got too hard to continue it. But here's an interview with Deb Agarwal from back in the day.
If anyone wants to take over this project and start it up again, I'd be happy to pass along the knowledge I gained in the process, and give you access and so on.
Back then I really felt that there was a Don't Ask, Don't Tell culture in CS research. When I got the NSF Fellowship, suddenly people knew I existed, and I immediately decided to use this to try to fight that culture. I don't know how much it helped, but I really hope it did.
I do feel that now as I'm about to graduate, the culture has shifted, whether or not I had any involvement in that. I am very happy that is true, and people no longer seem to see being LGBT as a "personal thing" we shouldn't ever talk about in professional contexts
The design of this blog was pretty intentional: fighting taboos by mixing discussion of research with discussion of what it's like to be LGBT as a CS researcher. This idea ought to generalize to other taboos worth smashing, like those around mental health and other disabilities.
So if you want to smash a taboo that harms the community, I hope this blog also serves as a model for one way to go about doing that. I'm happy to help you get started on an interview series about whatever taboo you want to smash (if I agree with smashing the taboo).
The intro post talks a bit about the importance of visibility, though do note that it uses some outdated language and notions from a very different time (which is in itself wonderful to be able to say): theidentityfunction.wordpress.com/2016/04/11/wha…
Oh I should note my life eventually got less hard, just I went through two really painful years that made it impossible to do something like this. Now it feels like digging up bad memories to resume. But I'd really love other people to take over, or learn from my efforts.
Also, at every point in my career at which I've gained some privilege or visibility, I've been extremely deliberate about using it to improve the community in a way I would have been afraid or unable to before. This was the first such effort---I hope to continue that pattern.
In the end, not everyone has the privilege to be able to be visible. But that just makes it extra important for those of us who do and who feel comfortable to be as visible as possible. (Hi, I'm still bi.) 🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It still confuses me that in spaces in which humans can often generalize from just 2 or 3 examples, it's considered successful when a software system does so from millions of examples
Nevermind robustness issues
It's true that, you know, reading the entire internet is something that computers can do better than us. But why should they have to? I feel like the metric for success is just wild
On the "we" versus "I" debate about my thesis, I ended up going with this:
- "I" for things I did,
- "we" for mathematical handholding, and
- "Nate" and "RanDair" and so on for things my coauthors did.
Nonstandard I guess, but I deliberately designed projects to decouple work.
So it is actually very easy to point to the parts that my coauthors did. And for the things that we really did design together, I will add a note about this in an early section at the end of the introduction, along with complete authorship statements.
I'm going to use the knowledge package that @16kbps recommended to introduce those authors and link back to the full authorship statements when I mention their names in later chapters. Credit is extremely important!!!
Oh man so I bought three books on the power dynamics of philanthropy, but hilariously, I accidentally bought "Winner Takes All" (a trashy high school romance novel) rather than "Winners Take All" (a scalding critique of the upper class and capitalism run wild). Oops
Time to find one of those little free libraries to drop the trashy high school romance novel
Definitely not a critique of the upper class hahahahaha
Writing my thesis, I'm just baffled by how well I subsumed my own work. The PUMPKIN Pi paper (arxiv.org/abs/2010.00774, PLDI 2021) completely subsumes DEVOID (dependenttyp.es/pdf/ornpaper.p…, ITP 2019). DEVOID just ends up being an example in my thesis. I'd be mad if anyone else did this.
Perhaps even more amusingly, in December 2019, I had the idea for PUMPKIN Pi, but also thought it was something I'd never be able to do without help from external experts. I didn't really do it deliberately in the end, either, so I'm surprised it happened at all.