What do the pledges from last week’s #LeadersClimateSummit mean for the future of natural gas?

An open-ended thread on what we know so far:

1/
Some starting points.

Natural gas is currently responsible for 22% of global CO2 emissions from energy, but is the world’s fastest growing fossil fuel.
globalcarbonproject.org

2/
Natural gas demand is expected to grow strongly in BAU scenarios.

But in IPCC 1.5C scenarios with low-to-moderate BECCS and low overshoot, gas demand falls 20-25% by 2030 on current levels - and up to 74% by 2050.

3/
Despite this, only 2 leaders mentioned natural gas directly at the #LeadersClimateSummit.

Emissions pledges will shape gas demand, but this is not always explicit.

4/

The return of the USA to climate action is big news for gas markets.

The US is the world’s largest producer *and* consumer of natural gas, and continued growth was projected.

5/
The US pledged a 50-52% GHG cut on 2005 levels by 2030.

This will put the squeeze on gas: it can’t be done through coal phaseout alone.

But I haven’t seen a good analysis yet of what the new target means for overall gas demand (hit me up in the replies if you have!)

6/
The power sector accounts for 39% of US gas demand.

The new US pledge for a zero carbon power system by 2035 means the bulk of that demand will disappear within 15 years. (Some residual gas demand for CCUS, tbc).
ember-climate.org/project/zero-c…
7/
The EU is the world's largest importer of natural gas.

The new 2030 55% GHG target enshrined in the EU climate law will imply a reduction in gas demand of around 36%, according to European Commission modelling.

8/
The UK, previously a poster child for the 'dash for gas', announced a new target of a 78% GHG reduction by 2035.

According to @theCCCuk models, this means reducing overall UK gas demand by 49% on current levels by 2035 - even with CCS.

9/
Japan is the world's largest LNG importer. It announced a new target of a 43% reduction in GHGs over fiscal 2013.

Shifting away from coal will do the heaviest lifting, but the acceleration of renewables will limit space for new gas.

10/

asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Envi…
Russia, the world's largest gas exporter, didn't promise much more, as expected.

Yet Putin was one of the few leaders to mention methane emissions. Is Russia starting to feel pressure on the environmental impact of its oil and gas production?

11/
en.kremlin.ru/events/preside…
China's new commitment to a “gradual decrease of coal consumption” from 2026-2030 could imply more gas in the near term.

But meeting China's net zero 2060 target means full power decarbonisation by 2050- within the lifetime of new gas infrastructure.
12/
newscientist.com/article/227517…
Canada's commitment was "meh"
Australia's number-wangling was embarrassing
South Korea and South Africa are still working on their targets
India remained enigmatic
... so I haven't done the numbers on those countries yet.

13/
Big news on gas finance too.

The US was previously a funder of gas expansion across the world, recently including $5bn for the ill-fated Mozambique LNG project.

It is now "ending official international finance for carbon-intensive fossil fuel"

14/
This NRDC explainer of the new US finance announcements is worth a read:
nrdc.org/experts/han-ch…

15/
The US announcement on ending international fossil finance follows similar decisions from the UK and EIB.

7 European countries also committed to aligning export credit with finance commitments, although their timelines still need work

16/
tresor.economie.gouv.fr/Articles/2021/…
South Korea committed to (finally!) ending international finance for coal.

Expect them to come under pressure for their oil and gas financing next.

17/
On the production side, US, Saudi, Qatar, Norway and Canada joined a new Net-Zero Producers Forum.

Together they represent 38% of global gas output - but it's still not clear what the initiative will entail.

18/
So in summary: despite the lack of explicit reference to natural gas, the outcome of the #LeadersClimateSummit implies a changing outlook for gas demand, finance and production.

Let me know in the replies if you know of other useful analysis.

19/
Final thought: there was little coverage of the Leaders Climate Summit in the gas industry trade press. Much of the industry discounts these sorts of commitments anyway.

But if the pledges are in fact met or exceeded, many gas industry players could face a hard landing.

20/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Gaventa

Jonathan Gaventa Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jonathangaventa

18 Jun 20
The leaked EU hydrogen strategy is clearly an early draft.

By the time it is published next month, I hope it will cut through the hype and start to confront the difficult unanswered questions about how hydrogen in Europe will be developed.

Thread:

euractiv.com/section/energy…
1) Who will plan, own, operate and regulate hydrogen networks?

Given that hydrogen will often compete directly with gas, how to avoid conflicts of interest?
2) How will the conversion of existing gas pipelines to hydrogen happen?

When will it start and when will it be completed?

What conditions need to be in place?

Will current fossil gas users be forced to disconnect or switch to hydrogen?
Read 7 tweets
8 Oct 18
1/ What role for natural gas in a 1.5⁰C world?

Some reflections from the new #IPCC #SR15 report:

(thread)
2/ A reminder: natural gas currently accounts for 20% of global energy emissions and is the world’s fastest growing fossil fuel. In the IEA’s current policies scenario, gas demand could increase by ~50% by 2040.

How far is this from a 1.5⁰C pathway?
3/ With coal, the IPCC message is simple: stop burning it. The IPCC pathways show a reduction in coal in primary energy use of 59-78% by 2030, compared to 2010. By 2050 it falls 73-97%.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!