@halfon4harlowMP starts by asking about compensation for students for lost learning under Covid.
Minister confirms no blanket arrangements and pays tribute to unis and their staff who pulled out all the stops.
@michelledonelan@CommonsEd@halfon4harlowMP The next question's about antisemitic speaker David Miller being allowed a platform at Bristol Uni – a blind alley for Donelan. She can't condemn the uni and speaker, while maintaining her departmental line about freedom of speech. Her way out is basically to buck-pass to OfS.
@michelledonelan@CommonsEd@halfon4harlowMP Follow-up questions on antisemitism & adopting the IHRA definition and whether she should be intervening at Bristol & elsewhere.
She just can't win here because of govt’s agenda about freedom of speech in unis. This discussion is exposing the inherent illogic and inconsistency.
This isn’t intended as a trap though. Passions on the subject are running high: @halfon4harlowMP says, “You should cut off funding. Why should universities get funding when they’re harbouring this kind of antisemite.”
@halfon4harlowMP Even if she had that authority, I’m assuming that he doesn’t genuinely think that undermining the education of thousands of students would be an appropriate (or legal) response.
@halfon4harlowMP Moving on to what the government is doing to support graduate employment. @michelledonelan applaud Uni of Chester and others for information, advice and guidance support.
@halfon4harlowMP@michelledonelan Minister says she wants to see the expansion of degree apprenticeships. In particular a widening of the range of courses and a greater number of apprenticeships offered by Russell Group institutions.
@halfon4harlowMP@michelledonelan One MP starts to ask about problem unis face in expanding degree apprenticeships, in particular with respect to inadequate funding. Chair curtails that line of questioning and commends Minister for her record in supporting skills. 🤔
I almost never disagree with Graeme Atherton on supporting disadvantaged students and @DrJoGrady is fantastic on so many things, but, on this, I think they're wrong...
...unless any shift to PQA is accompanied by a raft of changes & assurances that aren't currently planned.
2/
I have two key issues with the report:
▶️what they think the problem is
▶️what they think the solution is
The problem to solve is NOT the use of predicted grades.
And, as a solution, PQA would only make the real problem worse.
3/
Predicted #ALevel grades tend to be inaccurate and have proven to be lower than actual grades for students from socially disadvantaged backgrounds and higher than actual for socially advantaged students.
/2
While the approach proposed is not the same as predictions, it is similar and so the biases are likely to persist (although it will be impossible to know the extent of the bias).
/3
This piece for @HEPI_news by @Cis4Community (Beka Avery, Pathways to HE) is a really excellent dissection of some of the problems with HE outreach and the mismatch of priorities between unis and schools/colleges. hepi.ac.uk/2020/01/02/lif…
1/...
@HEPI_news@Cis4Community There’s a fundamental dilemma at the heart of #HEaccess: to be a fairer society, we want more disadvantaged people entering HE, but it is unethical and sanctimonious to attempt to tell any individual what choices they should make.
3/
@seainclusion@Positivteacha There is plenty of research showing a significant earnings premium on average for graduates regardless of background. This is probably the most comprehensive work: ifs.org.uk/publications/8…
@seainclusion@Positivteacha@suttontrust has also done many excellent studies on different aspects of this question which is actually a lot more complex than it sounds.
@seainclusion@Positivteacha@suttontrust The research shows that the graduate premium for those from disadvantaged backgrounds is indeed smaller than for those from more affluent families, but it is very hard to unpick this from other factors.
The #AugarReview is out today. I haven’t finished reading it, but here are some first impressions.
There’s much to praise. It’s measured and well argued, but ultimately it won’t solve the problem of post-18 education funding.
A thread...
The return of maintenance grants is the biggest positive, intended to end inquity of the poorest students graduating with the highest debts. #AugarReview
The reduction of fees to £7.5k is not enough to achieve anything positive for students. Anyone put off by £9,250 isn’t going to see it as a bargain and it will benefit only the graduates who earn most and won’t repay for as long #AugarReview