Navin Kabra Profile picture
28 Apr, 15 tweets, 4 min read
1. There are videos floating around on WhatsApp implying that Bhramari Pranayama (yogic breathing/humming) can protect you from Covid. I would like to poke holes in that theory and hope that a real expert (@bhalomanush?) will also chime in.
2. The claims start by talking about SaNOtize, a Canadian nasal spray that releases NO (nitric oxide) in your nose and claims to be a "prevention and early-treatment for Covid-19". Then they point out that bhramari increases NO naturally. Thus implying bhramari prevents Covid-19
3. Here is one of the better and more sensible videos in this category: facebook.com/Yogapoint/post…

An aunt sent this to me for validation before forwarding. Since I want to definitely positively encourage this behavior, I put in a bunch of effort at researching this.
4. To give credit where it is due, this video doesn't make any ridiculous claims, states the known facts accurately, gives the right disclaimers

I agree with his overall point: bhramari won't hurt you, can reduce stress, can have other health benefits, so why not give it a try?
5. But, people are interpreting this to mean that bhramari can protect you from Covid, and forwarding accordingly. That conclusion has problems which I would like to identify as an exercise in critical thinking. (You remember I teach kids a course on this, right?)
6. The good news first: NO is known to have good antimicrobial properties, and it can actually kill the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Also, it is believed to be quite safe.

Similarly, pranayama is generally beneficial to mental and physical health and is generally safe.
7. And 2 disclaimers: I am not an expert in these areas, so happy to be corrected (please tag the right experts). I will update this thread if that happens. Also, I'm not saying don't do bhramari. It is probably good for you; just don't expect miracles.
8. So, hole 1: SaNOtize hasn't had any large trials of efficacy. Their study in UK was small (phase 2; 72 patients only), and as far as I can tell, it only showed a decrease in viral load; not yet any direct impact on Covid symptoms. So we don't know if it works in reducing Covid
9. But suppose we accept that SaNOtize is very effective in reducing Covid, here's the (flawed) chain of logic: SaNOtize works by giving our body NO. Bhramari increases the natural NO in our body. Hence bhramari will have a similar effect.

But consider the details...
10. The research about bhramari cited by the video was with 1 hour of bhramari daily. Which might or might not give the same effect as 15 minutes. And almost certainly wouldn't be the same as the "4-5 breaths" being recommended in the video.
11. More importantly, the concentration of NO in SaNOtize is 60000-80000 nanoliters per liter. The amount of NO produced by our body normally is about 30 nL/L. Bhramari can increase it to 500 nL/L. Seems like this wouldn't be anywhere near enough to have an effect on Covid?
12. So, in summary: do your yoga, drink your kadha, snort your haldi, but keep your bloody mask on, and stay in your f**king house. Using the former to justify skipping the latter is the kind of thinking that got us in the mess we're currently in.
People keep pointing me towards this paper pointing out the benefits of bhramari for Covid-19 ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

But AFAICT, it contains no experiments and is simply a written version of the same logic as in the video
And no, people are not snorting haldi (as far as I know, but I'm sure we are capable of it). That was me taking poetic license.

However, people are doing various weird things with haldi, methi, and more, and landing up in the hospital: theprint.in/health/too-muc…
Yes, please get the vaccine as soon as you're eligible. Doing bhramari and eating haldi does not eliminate the need for the vaccine:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Navin Kabra

Navin Kabra Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NGKabra

6 Apr
The Utah government paid $20 million for an AI software that scans social media posts and identifies criminal activity in real-time.

Due to some problems they had to start an investigation: is the AI racially biased?

What do you think they found?

I love this story, so a 🧵 /1
Before you read the rest of this thread, try to guess what the investigation found in response to the question: Is the AI algorithm racially biased?

I bet the answer will surprise you.

But let me tell the whole story first. /2
Banjo, was a software company that made Live Time, a software with the capability to "detect active shooter incidents, child abduction cases, and traffic accidents from video footage or social media activity".

Impressive, no? /3
Read 9 tweets
19 Mar
1. "There is too much variability in our hiring process," says the business leader. "Depending on which interviewer they get, people with very different skills get hired. Your tool will help us standardize."

Supposedly the customer is always right, but this is where I push back
2. I feel like wisecracking: if our software outperforms your employees, you need better employees

But I know that's not true. They are usually good employees who need to be given better training
3. So I dig into what is happening in the interviews.

Depending on availability, a candidate gets randomly assigned to one of 3 different interviewers. And each of those interviewers asks questions based on their experience, background, and what they're currently obsessed with.
Read 22 tweets
9 Mar
Did you know that all the nuclear bombs we exploded in the '40s-50s-60s have permanently contaminated all the steel the world has produced since then? All steel in the world is divided into two categories: pre-1945 non-contaminated steel, and post-1945 contaminated steel.

How?
Nuclear bombs (including the tests) create a lot of radioisotopes that are not found in nature. For example Cobalt-60 (a radioactive version of Cobalt-59). And since the 1945 Trinity test, these have all dispersed in the atmosphere.

What does this have to do with steel?
The process of manufacturing steel uses atmospheric air (or atmospheric oxygen). Some of the radioisotopes like Cobalt-60 get pulled in too, and as a result, any steel produced after 1945 has embedded in it some of these radioisotopes, sitting there emitting gamma rays.
Read 10 tweets
22 Dec 20
1/ I've now taught my "Defense Against the Dark Arts" course (teaching teenagers about misinformation, fake news, misleading ads, etc) to 4 batches, and it has been a very rewarding experience for me

A quick thread on my learnings and suggestions for you

genwise.in/events-3/defen…
2/ My biggest learning has been how quickly children figure out things with the help of the internet as long as they are just pointed in the correct direction.

They don't need teachers. They need people who can motivate them and point them in the right direction.
3/ Consider the exercise in this photo. I gave them no other coaching, but within minutes most of them had figured out why each of these ads was misleading and they were able to articulate and discuss subtleties like "The product is a good product, but the claim is exaggerated." Image
Read 13 tweets
24 Nov 20
If, like me, you're confused about the Oxford/AstraZeneca (Pune-walla!) vaccine, which is 70% effective, but also 90% effective, then here is an explanation. 🧵
The Oxford vaccine requires two shots one month apart. The original design called for two equal shots. However, someone made a mistake and a small fraction of the volunteers got only half a dose in the first shot, and the full dose in the second shot.
🧵
Later, analysis of the data showed—to everybody's surprise—that the ½+1 dose regimen was 90% effective and the standard 1+1 dose regimen was only 66% effective.

The average of these two regimens across all volunteers is 70%, and that is what has to be reported 🧵
Read 13 tweets
29 Sep 20
As a child, I always wondered why Indian words like राम always got written as "Rama" in English. To me "Ram" seemed like a much better fit for the pronunciation. I thought it was because of British arbitrariness.

Only recently I learnt the real reason for this. /1
Consider गम. How would you pronounce it? Like the English word "gum" right? As a Hindi/Marathi speaker, I can't imagine any other pronunciation.

But, for a Sanskrit speaker, things are different. गम् is pronounced "gum". In गम the full म is pronounced, so it becomes "gum-uh" /2
The extra "-uh" sound which is the difference between गम and गम् is called a schwa

And modern Indian languages like Hindi and Marathi all have an (unwritten) rule that the schwa at the end of a word isn't to be pronounced

This is called schwa deletion en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwa_del… /3
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!