Remember, AZ and J&J both basically put the code for the spike protein (read: asshole protein) on an empty shell of an adenovirus.
This adenovirus is a useless husk. They’ve taken away its ability to do much. Most importantly they’ve taken away its ability to replicate & spread.
So it can infect your cell, but then it can’t replicate or spread or do anything. All it does is get your cell produce asshole protein (like the mRNA vaccines do).
Your body sees these proteins, destroys them & the useless adenovirus, & now remembers the asshole protein.
Okay, so that’s all well and good. Sputnik does a similar thing but they use two ‘different’ adenoviruses between the two doses.
Otherwise, the viruses do the same thing. Be a useless vehicle to get your body to produce asshole protein.
Except it appears that in the adenovirus for the 2nd shot, they didn’t remove the part that makes it useless.
See, as Dr Rasmussen describes, there’s a part of the virus that you can delete so the virus can’t replicate. And they didn’t do that for the 2nd Sputnik shot!
So now they’ve given a live replicating virus instead of useless one.
Now, adenoviruses don’t generally cause serious symptoms, but that’s not the point. That’s just straight up sloppy! Did they forget? Is it a production concern? What the hell?
That’s basically the limit of my knowledge here and so I defer to real experts on the matter for more info.
But some important points: 1) This is a problem with Sputnik, not a problem with this ‘class’ of vaccine. It has no bearing on AZ or J&J.
2) This is why it’s useful to have different federal agencies vet this stuff. There are processes in place to make sure quality standards are met. And when they aren’t, we catch them, like in this case.
I guess, for the record, Sputnik disagrees, calls it ‘fake news’, and says the decision is ‘political’ in the link provided. Now, it’s possible this was a problem with only that batch of vaccines but... this sort of response doesn’t build confidence, to put it mildly.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here’s the thing, we’re “managing” right now because the variant load is still mostly in Regina & patients can be spread elsewhere. But if/when the variants go widespread... there’s no longer ‘some’ triaging.
You know, @Kinger999 is right, Saskatchewan should set a target that says Mosaic Stadium will be open at full capacity for the Riders if the province hits an 85% adult vaccination rate.
Just pass out a watermelon helmet with every vaccination card. Come on people, this isn’t hard to figure out!
I did the math. Great West Pil is $35 for 24 right now. It would cost $1.16M to give the first 85% of all Sask adults a Pilsner with their vaccination.
Getting vaccinated against COVID should be easiest thing anyone does in society. You should be able to call out your window and a public health nurse floats down like Mary Fucking Poppins and jabs you with the end of their umbrella.
How can we coordinate hundreds of locations with multiple different eligibility criteria?
If I want a donair, Skip The Fucking Dishes will connect me with the closest one and give me a 15 minute time frame. I don’t have to phone 8 different donair waiting lists.
True story: for a few years I traveled with @kgillese & @arlenkonopaki doing tech for their show Scratch, where they created hilarious stories out of thin air dailu.
I learned a metric tonne from those guys and I love seeing the stuff they’re up to now.
So, @DrKyle has a thread here about vaccine hesitancy, and how this may be concern in Saskatchewan. And while I don’t disagree that vaccine hesitancy is a concern, I think it’s important to reframe how we think about it.
We tend to view vaccine hesitancy as some sort of binary. You’re either for the vaccine or against it. But it’s not as simple as that.
For instance, here we see that the rate of vaccination for 60-69 year olds is starting to drop off. But I think it isn’t quite fair to view it as vaccine ‘denial’.
(Though, I very much appreciate the work he put into gathering this data & think there’s ‘potential’ concern)