One of the developments easily overlooked in the extraordinary turbulence of 2019 was the very strong Green performance in local elections that year - was their best performance ever. Will be interesting to see if they can repeat it next week
If they do then this may have seismic long term implications- the Lib Dems’ enduring strength as the main third party in England is built on their ability to build support, visibility and activists via local government. Greens did same in Brighton, now looking to build out
Labour probably have most to worry about from Green expansion given the overlap between two parties’ appeals - Greens could swiftly become a new hone for disaffected liberal-left voters. But if Greens demonstrate local competence they could easy draw support from Cons & LDs too
Greens might displace LDs in some places as the local govt choice for all, or we might end up with a patchwork map - Greens emerge as local opposition to Lab in v Lab places, LDs remain as local opposition to Com in v Con places.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is *not* a call to instinctively distust authorities. It *is* a call to think about the numbers involved:
Absolutely minute risk of a harm from vaccine vs (often) larger risk of harms from vaccine suspension.
If the sums don't add up, they don't add up.
Conversely if the sums do add up, they do add up. It depends on the details of the vaccine restriction (who's not getting the jabs, how at risk from COVID are they), the state of the vaccine rollout, and the state of the local COVID situation.
Interesting piece, and in points to a growing dilemma for Labour, which we discuss in Brexitland: its two strongest constituencies are increasingly white "conviction liberals" and ethnic minorities. They agree strongly on antiracism, but disagree strongly on many other things
For example, socially conservative views on gender, LGBT rights, the role of women, even law and order, are frequently found among BAME voters, & among BAME faith organisations. Labour can either shun those voters/organisations or annoy white liberals.
Traditionally, white liberals have tended to put antiracism/BAME representation first in this regard and/or the social conservatism of BAME voters has simply not been v salient. This latest incident suggests that position may become harder to sustain.
Some of the biggest founts of UK politics fake news on social media have been hyper-partisan sites like the Canary, Another Angry Voice or Westmonster, whose creators and readers are evidently motivated by intense hatred of the out-party.
Seems very plausible to me that a lot of people sharing that kind of content do it because they provide an attractive good not so easily available from mainstream sources - attention grabbing ultra-negative stories about the outgroup
Today's report of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities looks very much like an example of the "politics of racism" which @ProfSobolewska discussed at length in Brexitland.
@ProfSobolewska Antiracism is a losing issue for the Conservatives, who have for 50 plus years been less trusted on the issue than Labour (and for good reason - all significant antiracism legislation passed by Labour). Yet dismissing racism is also a losing issue for them, too - so what to do?
@ProfSobolewska The obvious answer is what we see today - acknowledging racism as an issue, while seeking (a) to play up (real) areas of progress and tell a positive story and (b) minimise attention to (real) areas of continuing discrimination and disadvantage
I would appreciate it @afneil if you would either delete or correct the tweet claiming I have "had to backtrack". I have not changed my statement but instead reiterated and explained it a number of times. Please do not misrepresent my views.
@afneil For example @afneil this explains why the context of Webbe's situation is relevant. As I'm sure a veteran political journalist such as yourself will recognise: