The NRA bankruptcy trial is back in session today. They're interviewing the NRA's outside auditing company today. You can watch here: txnb.uscourts.gov/sites/txnb/fil…
Wayne LaPierre is now testifying. He says he's feeling better than last time he testified because he's not on any medication this time.
Welp. We're running into the same problem as last time LaPierre testified. He keeps trying to add explanations to his answers that get struck. The judge has repeatedly told him to just answer the question.
LaPierre said he didn't know any details about the $748,000 in settlement payments to former NRA managing director of management Mike Marcellin. But he signed off on the payments because lawyers advised him to do so.
The New York AG's lawyer is asking Wayne LaPierre about coverage of leaked footage of him and his wife killing elephants in Africa.
NRA lawyers are arguing the footage was released to embarrass LaPierre. Which makes you wonder why they did the hunt in the first place...
The judge said he's seen headlines about LaPierre's elephant hunt but he hasn't watched the video. He ruled the question about the elephant hunt was irrelevant.
Wayne Lapierre just testified there are currently about 4.89 million NRA members and about 2 million of those are life members.
This is down significantly from the peak of 6 million they publicly reporting having a few years ago. The membership does tend to fluctuate in non-election years.
The trial is taking a lunch break now. It'll be back at 2:30pm est.
The judge reiterates in closing today that he doesn't think the video of Wayne LaPierre hunting an elephant in 2013 that @mikespiesnyc published this week is relevant to the NRA's bankruptcy case.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Basically, can the NRA use bankruptcy as protection from New York Attorney General Letitia James's stated goal of dissolving the organization through litigation?
He has incorporated a key point that James's lawyers have hammered at quite a bit: the AG can't just order dissolution herself. A judge would have to sign off on it too.
What happens if the Supreme Court doesn't deliver for gun-rights advocates? What would it take to make gun-rights groups break with the GOP? I discuss this and more in a post for @TheReloadSite members. thereload.com/analysis-could…
Professor Robert Leider noted Republicans have delivered very little for gun-rights advocates at the federal level outside of judges. If those judges turn out to be a bust, he thinks that could create a rift in the coalition. I'm not as sure. thereload.com/analysis-could…
It's true Republicans take gun-rights advocates completely for granted at the federal level. Trump didn't deliver any substantial gun-rights laws. The NRA & others spent tens of millions on re-electing him but he didn't make any promises to push for specific pro-gun legislation.
I spoke to 3 of the top gun law experts in the country. They were less than optimistic about how gun-rights advocates might fare in the Supreme Court's first-ever gun-carry case. thereload.com/experts-say-sc…
“Gun-rights advocates should not count their chickens yet,” Robert Leider, assistant professor at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School, told The Reload. “There are several ways this case could go against the challengers.”
“They might try and duck the issue or find some way to avoid ruling on it or make some really narrow ruling that only affects New York and let them modify their law to get around it,” Josh Blackman, a South Texas College of Law professor and Cato Institute scholar, said.
NEW: Gun-Rights Groups Cheer Supreme Court Concealed Carry Case as Gun-Control Advocates Watch Nervously thereload.com/gun-rights-gro…
“I’m really glad,” Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation, told @TheReloadSite. “I expect to see New York’s law struck down.” thereload.com/gun-rights-gro…
Hannah Shearer, litigation director at the Giffords Law Center, was not glad. She described the court’s decision to take the case, which the lower court decided in favor of New York, as “reckless.”
The Supreme Court will decide if the gun-carry laws in some of the country's most populous states violate the Second Amendment thereload.com/supreme-court-…
Gun-rights activists have been working towards another big SCOTUS gun case for over a decade. And gun-control activists have feared it just as long. Now it's finally here. thereload.com/supreme-court-…