Not at all surprised to see this. Not at all.
Of all the invites we've sent out over the years to welcome outside review of our work, @PetrSvab of @EpochTimes is the only one who ever took us up on that offer.
The rest either smeared or were quiet in the face of the smear.
Of all the invites we've sent out over the years to welcome outside review of our work, @PetrSvab of @EpochTimes is the only one who ever took us up on that offer.
The rest either smeared or were quiet in the face of the smear.
https://twitter.com/MattBraynard/status/1387758768952315906
Speaking of smears, look at the trend on Twitter right now re: the Arizona audit, citing "some experts" who're "raising questions".
Bunk.
@kelliwardaz and @AZGOP invited everyone and anyone to participate in this audit. They refused B/C they wanted to have an excuse after it.
Bunk.
@kelliwardaz and @AZGOP invited everyone and anyone to participate in this audit. They refused B/C they wanted to have an excuse after it.
Funny how many of those classified as "experts" reversed themselves after years — even decades — of research on the impact of mail-in-voting re: fraud and turnout.
Simply have no principled positions. Might as well hang "For Sale" signs around their necks.
Simply have no principled positions. Might as well hang "For Sale" signs around their necks.
Btw, speaking of @EpochTimes...
The ET Poll conducted by @BigDataPoll in late summer/early fall was more accurate than those conducted a week before, even days before Election Day.
The margin was spot on.
I know, it hurts.
The ET Poll conducted by @BigDataPoll in late summer/early fall was more accurate than those conducted a week before, even days before Election Day.
The margin was spot on.
I know, it hurts.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
