Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is an airway management technique that produces inducing immediate unresponsiveness (induction agent) and muscular relaxation (neuromuscular blocking agent) & is the fastest & most effective means of controlling the emergency airway.
RSI is particularly useful in the patient with an intact gag reflex, a “full” stomach, and a life threatening injury or illness requiring immediate airway control
Some people also call this as "Drug assisted Intubation"
‘modified’ RSI is a term sometimes used to describe variations on the ‘classic’ RSI approach (e.g. ventilation during apnea, titration of induction agents);
modified approaches tend to trade an increased risk of aspiration for other benefits (e.g. prevent respiratory acidosis due to apnea from compounding severe metabolic acidosis)
INDICATIONS FOR INTUBATION AND MECHANICAL VENTILATION
A – airway protection and patency
B – respiratory failure (hypercapnic or hypoxic), increase FRC, decrease WOB, secretion management/ pulmonary toilet, to facilitate bronchoscopy
C – minimise oxygen consumption and optimize oxygen delivery (e.g. sepsis)
D – unresponsive to pain, terminate seizure, prevent secondary brain injury
E — temperature control (e.g. serotonin syndrome)
F — For humanitarian reasons (e.g. procedures) and for safety during transport (e.g. psychosis)
The decision to perform RSI in the ‘out of theatre’ setting involves weighing the pros and cons.
PROCESS OF RSI
Remembered as the 9Ps:
Plan
Preparation (drugs, equipment, people, place)
Protect the cervical spine
Positioning (some do this after paralysis and induction)
Preoxygenation
Pretreatment (optional; e.g. atropine, fentanyl and lignocaine)
Paralysis and Induction
Placement with proof
Postintubation management
Some add a 10th P for (cricoid) pressure after pretreatment but this procedure is optional and has many drawbacks
Here is a possible sequence flowchart
These are the drugs we need to use 1. Pretreatment
"The dictate that one 'not speak ill of the dead' is (at best) appropriate for private individuals, not influential public figures.
While the supporters of this person will rightfully feel aggrieved the opponents equally have their right to react how they please."
So enough with the moral high horse shithousery
People can say what they want about him
That's their right
And people can abuse each other for it
That's what social media is for isn't it?
Personally it makes no difference to me what happened to him except for one tiny point.
A very simple point really
I just want to emphasize that
1%
Those 1% are people who were loved or hated
People who meant something to someone
Remember that the next time you decide to spew the 1% bullshit in your propaganda
At least let that be the good that comes from his death
A certain doctor with a moderately decent twitter following is outraged over the "media coverage of the funeral pyres all over the nation" & is demanding to know "why aren't the media focusing on mild/moderate cases & the recovery rate instead"
I honestly have no reply for this🤷♂️
Good Morning
Short answer is NO - utter nonsense
Long answer
This forward has two parts to it
1 true & 1 not
While the role of varying levels of progesterone & oestrogen affecting the immune system has been seen in some studies (true)
Vaccines DON'T DECREASE immunity (false)
Vaccine trigger the immune system to produce antibodies by mimicking an infection. That's why many have fever after a vaccine. You are literally being infected by a milder form of the disease to allow your body to have a practice sparring session with it.
one point i will add is, if you are a woman who has really difficult periods (Dysmenorrhea) then maybe you could consider delaying till you cross that time
this is only a matter of personal preference & situation nothing else