1. Clash of generations: there’s a generation that remembers a Zimbabwe of high standards; a country that worked & had promise. There’s a generation of young adults with no such memory. Their universe was shaped by falling standards; a Zimbabwe that doesn’t work; without promise
2. One generation remembers a Zimbabwe where buses had a time-table & ran on time; cities where running water & electricity were the norm; a Zimbabwe where the milkman left milk bottles at the gate & the postman delivered letters in the box & the Zimbabwe Dollar was proper money.
3. For the other generation, queuing for water at the borehole is normal. For the bucket generation, the bathtub & shower are exceptions. Mushikashika. Kungwavhangwavha. Potholed roads. Dark streets. It’s the norm. It came into a world without things that others take for granted
4. One generation is motivated by the aspiration to at least go back to how things were, for things worked. The other has no such motivation because it doesn’t know any better. It doesn’t have that memory. The only life it has known is a life of low standards; things don’t work
5. In the past, they learned to write application letters & CVs. They aspired to work like their parents. Today, it seems pointless because even their parents have no jobs. From school they find refuge on street corners & in intoxicating substances; excited by little things.
6. Is it any surprise then that there’s a pre-occupation with frivolity & an apparent lack of care for public affairs? One generation measures its world by the memory of what it knows is possible. The memory of the other is a world shaped by hyperinflation & useless “billions”
7. The challenge of declining standards of the last 20 years in particular is not just in physical infrastructure - bad roads, poor schools & hospitals, etc. It is also in the mindset, individual & collective; the mental universe. There’s a huge battle to repair & reform that.
8. It is not unusual for people to get comfortable in conditions of want; to adjust & accept it as fateful. Some might even doubt liberation from their tormentors; to say it’s not possible & it’s pointless to try. The emancipation of minds is the great generational imperative.
9. Without freeing minds and showing the boundless possibilities, the nation will continue to generate more and more for whom mediocrity & frivolity are “normal”. When you know no better & when you don’t have better to do, frivolity & mediocrity become a way of life.
10. It’s the challenge of leaders to inspire people into seeing these boundless possibilities. Leaders shape ‘imagined realities’ & sell them to the people. Zimbabwe is an increasingly young voting population. Those whose imagined realities are believed by the young will succeed
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. This thread is in honour of one of the iconic cases in Zimbabwean Family Law, reported in 1984. The father of a woman had sued for seduction damages from the man. The lower courts had ruled in his favour but the man appealed to the Supreme Court
2. The Supreme Court ruled that the Legal Age of Majority Act, passed in 1982 (LAMA) had liberated black women from their old status as perpetual minors under customary law. A father no longer had a right to claim seduction damages for a daughter who had reached 18 years.
3. It’s probably hard to imagine it now but LAMA & the judgment were pretty revolutionary for black women. Before, a black woman was a minor under the guardianship of her father or husband. She could not enter into any contracts, including marriage without her guardian’s consent.
1. I sincerely hope this was not a mere show Senator @DMwonzora which covers a done deal with ZANU PF whereby some MDC-T Senators will vote for the illegal amendment but for once in a long time you spoke like the constitution-builder that you were. openparly.com/index.php/2021…
2. I’m still at a loss however as to why, with your constitutional campus still intact, you voted for the first amendment which was non-existent & obviously illegal. The illegality you’re rightly complaining of now re the second affects everything under that illegal amendment.
3. As such, powerful as this speech appears to be in defence of the Constitution, it is akin to shutting the stable doors after the horses have bolted. If your vote for the first amendment was tactical, it was ill-advised because it should have come with a concession.
1. This letter is from 1897. It was written by Njube, son of King Lobengula. Njube, in the middle, had been sent away to Cape Town by Cecil John Rhodes after the conquest of the Ndebele nation. In this picture he is with his brothers Mpezeni & Nguboyenja.
2. In this letter, Njube was pleading with Rhodes to be allowed to return home. He wanted to be with his people and to learn his language, he wrote. He wanted to be with mother. A proud young man, he expresses embarrassment at having to ask for money from Rhodes.
3. Njube had been taken away by Rhodes ostensibly to be educated in Cape Town, but the real fear was that he would provide a rallying point for his people who would proclaim him successor to his father. Njube didn’t like the forced exile as the letter shows.
1. I was always intrigued by the acronym “AVM” since I was a boy. My search led me to a beautiful history of this bus model & why it deserves a high place amongst the greats of Zimbabwe. I wrote it in a recent BSR but here’s one for the Twitter market.
2. Before the 1960s, bus supplies were largely imported from Britain with Leyland being the dominant company. When Ian Smith declared independence in 1965 (UDI), Rhodesia faced UN sanctions & British supplies dried up. There had to be a new plan, as was the case in other areas.
3. Dahmer Pvt Ltd had been formed in 1961. It took on the challenge of developing the AVM as a “home-produced vehicle” which was mass produced from 1974 (White, 2016). Dahmer was now a Lonrho subsidiary. It started as a short model carrying 64 passengers before rising to 76.
1. A few weeks ago I received a DM from an obscure account. It made reference to challenges that Zimbabwean students in India were facing. I checked the account & saw that it had written similar pleas to Secretary Ndaba Mangwana at Information & Publicity.
2. I wasn’t sure but my instinct pushed me to believe there was something to it. I wrote back and eventually some of the students wrote to confirm after I tweeted a request for further information. It was true. Things were not well & the situation was desperate.
3. When their plight was raised here, government took notice & activated measures to address it. But that wasn’t before others within tried to pretend all was well. I would like to acknowledge in particular the Treasury Secretary @GGuvamatanga for stepping up on this occasion
1. You would think it’s safer at the bank. But ask Stone Beattie Studio. It deposited US$142K at CABS. Few years later government decreed it was now ZWL142K, a tiny fraction of its value. CABS refused to pay the USD citing the law. The Supreme Court agreed. Isn’t that a heist?
2. The question editor & homeboy, is not why people carry large sums BUT why some people still deposit money at the bank. Because the difference between the street robber and the banker is that one has the authority of the state by law to rob. But truth is, both rob other people
3. It is a sign of a dysfunctional financial and economic system when individuals prefer to keep such money in person rather than at the bank. It’s not just currency laws & lack of trust. It’s the extortionate bank charges, the cumbersome, inefficient & rude service provision.