Sir Richard, who was 'C' (MI6 head) from 1999 to 2004, says that the WHO joint study report was a "farcical investigation".
lbc.co.uk/news/coronavir…
Worth listening to...
and he makes a good point about scientific journals:
You can read a related recent thread here:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gilles Demaneuf

Gilles Demaneuf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gdemaneuf

4 May
With Covid-19 China is doing exactly the same stonewalling as it did earlier when asked to provide truthful data on its HIV-AIDS caseload in 2002:

smh.com.au/national/austr… Image
The same stonewalling too as it did in 2003 when it refused to provide any SARS case numbers for months.

China is not in this WHO case count as 15th March 2003 below.
Officially no SARS case reported in China. Go look elsewhere instead.

pihabeach.micro.blog/2021/04/02/any… Image
The same stonewalling it used in 2004 when the promised WHO-China investigation of the bad Beijing lab leaks turned somehow into a China-only investigation.

An investigation which published only brief extracts of its report and covered up two index cases
gillesdemaneuf.medium.com/the-good-the-b… Image
Read 5 tweets
4 May
@edwardcholmes can be quite straight to the point at times:

Quote:
One theory that Professor Holmes had no hesitation in dismissing is the Beijing-sponsored claim that the pandemic emerged from America’s Fort Detrick:
“That’s total nonsense.”

smh.com.au/national/austr…
Quote:
Another theory [--] is that the virus travelled to Wuhan on food packaging:

“I don’t believe that either. That’s a way of trying to push it away from China, more political than scientific.“ Image
Where his logic seems to fail, is when he cannot believe that some Chinese scientists could be lying: Image
Read 12 tweets
1 May
Does someone remember that?

"it seems that Australia, this giant kangaroo that serves as a dog of the US, will hit a deadlock with China on trade disputes in sectors like coal and beef. Hopefully, the US will compensate it!" one netizen said in a Weibo  
globaltimes.cn/content/118881…
A slap to the face to countries like Australia - the most active player in pushing forward a so-called independent probe into China over the coronavirus outbreak, which was then rejected by the international community. Such moves, clearly backed by Washington, are doomed to fail.
So thanks to China's efforts, we got a 'trully independent' enquiry, which promptly pointed to frozen food imports and no case officially recorded in China before 8th Dec 19.

That's the 'immaculate infection', nothing to do with China.

Read 6 tweets
1 May
We shall see what the US administration recommends at the world Health Assembly, starting on the 25th May.

In the meantime the NIH is expected to answer the request from the Republican Leaders on the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
republicans-energycommerce.house.gov/news/covid-ori…
Our latest provides some clear reference points for such a proper enquiry: 'Essential Data', 'Essential Questions' and a clear distinction between the possible lab-related accident scenarios.

It also shows the big gaps and flaws in the WHO-China joint-study conclusions on these.
Read 5 tweets
30 Apr
They did it so quietly that I missed it.
Quite amazing.

@Anne_MarieBrady
newsroom.co.nz/nz-releases-be…
But note that NZ does not have the courage to mention the need to keep investigating the lab related accident hypothesis.

The statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade simply does not go as far as Dr Tedros and never mentions that hypothesis!
mfat.govt.nz/en/media-and-r…
It's all about the critical importance of the OneHealth approach

"[The report] has helpfully highlighted the critical importance of the One Health approach between human health and animal health regulatory agencies, shining a spotlight on an area that deserves greater attention"
Read 8 tweets
27 Apr
This is very important (T/H @Byron_Wan):

"However, China, Russia, Syria and Pakistan specifically ask to delete a reference that would include the WHO’s coronavirus origins study in this report".

politico.eu/article/china-…
Why does Pakistan pop up?

Pakistan is in full collaboration with China under the Belt & Road Initiative.

See for instance the Nature series of article, written by Ehsan Masood, 'Editor of Editorials' (!) at Nature, in particular #2 in the series:

nature.com/immersive/d415…
This collaboration includes civilian research with the WIV.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!