The fuss over the New York Post piece on school openings puzzles me. The scoop: a union advised for inclusion of language permitting closures if aggressive variants spread, and a WFH dispensation for teachers at high risk of severe illness.
Who feels outrage over that? Anyone?
Who feels outrage over that? Anyone?
The eruption of the B.1.1.7 variant in the UK led to a lockdown that reversed school openings there. Macron followed suit with closings when B.1.1.7 hammered France.
Is the Post’s position that throttling the spread of a deadlier variant is _bad_, actually?
Is the Post’s position that throttling the spread of a deadlier variant is _bad_, actually?
If people want to perform resentment of teachers, along with the unions they form to protect their bodily safety, I wish they would just get at _that_ — and skip the incessant prowl for weak pretexts to yell ‘gotcha!’
Seriously: this is an acerbic but fair summary of that NY Post exclusive.
How do these common-sense acknowledgements harm kids, exactly? Can anyone identify an argument here?
How do these common-sense acknowledgements harm kids, exactly? Can anyone identify an argument here?
https://twitter.com/lolgop/status/1388830410105360385
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
