Follow this chronology...
The NYT staff once infamously held a town hall meeting where they openly discussed a desired shift to coverage of racism/white supremacy in America. The goals of manufacturing this narrative were stated plainly.
Here are the receipts from that work:
The NYT staff once infamously held a town hall meeting where they openly discussed a desired shift to coverage of racism/white supremacy in America. The goals of manufacturing this narrative were stated plainly.
Here are the receipts from that work:
https://twitter.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1351581822266843137
In August of 2019, one of our nation's top race-hustlers, @nhannahjones, releases The 1619 Project via the NYT. It is presented as an alternative "history" of America. Critical word.
Go back and read the coverage of the project at that time. "Glowing" doesn't do it justice.
Go back and read the coverage of the project at that time. "Glowing" doesn't do it justice.
In 2020, at the height of the manufactured zombie-like fervor over race in this country, the 1619 Project is awarded a Pulitzer Prize.
It doesn't get more legitimate than that. 🏆
Timely!
It doesn't get more legitimate than that. 🏆
Timely!
Why is "history" such an important word? Because the 1619 Project was then turned into curriculum textbooks to supplement (or in some cases, completely supplant) the current "history" curriculum presently in place in our public schools.
Our children's minds are the real trophy.
Our children's minds are the real trophy.
But, wait, there's a problem!
Real historians (those who aren't simply attempting to ramrod their preferred ideology down America's throat like NHJ) quickly identified that 1619 is not an accurate retelling of "history" at all.
It's an ideological sales pitch.
Real historians (those who aren't simply attempting to ramrod their preferred ideology down America's throat like NHJ) quickly identified that 1619 is not an accurate retelling of "history" at all.
It's an ideological sales pitch.
Mind you, that snipet above is from the kids' gloves-treatment world of Wikipedia re anything that could impact the left.
What was the "modifying" of one of the "passages that had provoked controversy"?
Yeah, it was that part about it being "history".🙃
thefederalist.com/2020/09/21/nyt…
What was the "modifying" of one of the "passages that had provoked controversy"?
Yeah, it was that part about it being "history".🙃
thefederalist.com/2020/09/21/nyt…
"But if it's not history, then it shouldn't have been made into school curriculum!"
💡 That is correct.
"You mean it was awarded a Pulitzer w/o these basics even being vetted?"
Of course. How else could it have obtained such an aura of legitimacy?
💡 That is correct.
"You mean it was awarded a Pulitzer w/o these basics even being vetted?"
Of course. How else could it have obtained such an aura of legitimacy?
The real enraging part? Those 1619-based textbooks are still being used in numerous public schools across the country.
If you genuinely believe this cult-like fixation on racism/white supremacy consuming our nation is organic... bless your heart.
If you genuinely believe this cult-like fixation on racism/white supremacy consuming our nation is organic... bless your heart.
And I'm not talking behind your back, @nhannahjones. I'd be eager to publicly discuss these Hunger Games you and your ilk are so feverishly trying to create, Nikole.
I don't have the army behind me that you do, but I'm here for it! ⚔🇺🇸
I don't have the army behind me that you do, but I'm here for it! ⚔🇺🇸
If you're not familiar with Ms. Hannah-Jones, this is her...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
