My piece on Toronto schools and what should happen to them: keep them public (and if they are sold, sell them smart). theglobeandmail.com/canada/toronto…
These places have important public functions and government should figure out a way to maintain them 2/
News: the board’s real estate agency says they may have six or seven big sites for redevelopment. They floated this apparently theoretical proposal for 1 Danforth Ave. 3/
This is that site. One of the easiest targets, in a political sense, in the whole system, but the building is a masterpiece. 4/
The city agency @_CreateTO should take over this work. It will require creative and ambitious development to take care of these places. 5/
Finally: many of these buildings have been allowed to crumble for 20 years (cc @Fix_Our_Schools) But many of them are important. This situation requires expert architectural and heritage advice. instagram.com/p/CB1kKMfAuvQ/… 6/
Here is another plan TLC shared. It is for @YORKMEMO_TDSB. A complete demolition of the school and most of the civic building next door; community centre; and townhouses. Maximal loss of public space and heritage; small financial return; low density next to transit. 7/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Modest proposal for Toronto: the city's real estate agency @_CreateTO should be empowered to *shape* what city agencies do with their sites. Public assets should be managed holistically with an eye to top city priorities and first-tier design.
A critically important site @ExPlaceTO has been underused and degrading. Acres of underused land next to a rapid transit hub. Its use and management are of citywide concern.
The theatre agency @TOLiveTweets is pursuing a major and very expensive project that has little hope of happening
I have a piece coming @globeandmail, but: It’s shocking how quickly things have changed on this file, and yet much more change is both possible and necessary
Watching the Toronto council debate on multiplexes. It's very calm. Seems very much as though this proposal is going to pass. Set up by Dustin Cook here theglobeandmail.com/canada/article…
This political shift has been late, but it's been fast. The xenophobia and straw men so evident in Vancouver and California are relatively absent here
There's some nonsense, to be sure. Stephen Holyday now mad that a fourplex is allowed to be bigger than a single monster home. The injustice!
"Very few buildings have truly significant historical or cultural value, and we must differentiate between those that do and those that simply offer a nostalgic aesthetic." theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
I think this is exactly right. While the Australian context is foreign, the insight carries over: heritage includes more diverse stories and people. But a 40-year bloat of dubious listings in rich-white-people neighbourhoods remains intact.
In my local Toronto context, there is both too little protection -- of public and/or Modern buildings -- and far, far too much protection of other things. A reckoning is necessary.
In an uncharacteristically bold move, Tory just announced some YIMBY planning reform. This must continue.
Unfortunately, city staff aren’t up for it. Today: planning agrees that the new downtown waterfront Villiers neighbourhood can be 30% more dense. In fact it should be 100% more. secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda…
Mark Sutcliffe: “Downtown could be a 15-minute neighborhood and Barrhaven could be a 15-minute neighbourhood.” One of these things is true, and the other is absolutely not. Barrhaven:
If the city decentralizes, a low-density, car-oriented exurb like Barhaven will not just acquire any of the qualities of the “15-Minute City.” Neighbourhood retail and services are very hard to run in a place like that.