Hi @fmanjoo @nytimes

Your recent article claims “fossil fuels... get more expensive as we pull more of them from the ground”

But that’s falsified by the tech revolution which dramatically lowered the price of natural gas (graph below)

Isn’t a correction merited?
You might be interested in research I did into the origins of the fracking revolution which resulted in radical price declines of oil & gas. It was cited by your colleague a few years back:

nytimes.com/2015/01/21/bus…
You might also be interested in reporting done by your newspaper into the use of forced labor to make solar panels, which may be responsible for a significant share of their price decline, alongside dumping, neither of which is mentioned in your column

nytimes.com/2021/01/08/bus…
They wrote a follow-up story recently that you might have missed

“In the past few years, Chinese polysilicon manufacturers have increasingly shifted to Xinjiang, lured by abundant coal and cheap electricity for their energy-intensive production.”

nytimes.com/2021/04/20/bus…
You may also be interested in learning and writing about how and why, even as solar panels and wind turbines themselves become cheaper, they make electricity more expensive
Every place that deploys renewables energies at scale makes electricity more expensive.

California has seen its electricity prices rise 7 times more than they did in the rest of the U.S. since 2011.
Germany saw its electricity prices rise 50% as it deployed renewables and today they are the highest in Europe.

France spends about half as much for electricity that produces one-tenth of the carbon emissions as Germany.
After generating just 23% of its electricity from solar panels, California is suffering from blackouts and price spikes stemming from over-dependence on weather-dependent energies.

Imagine what tripling solar production would do.
While you might look at all the evidence and still support transitioning to weather-dependent energies, your column requires a correction.

Best wishes,

Michael
PS: One reason renewables make electricity expensive is bc they are weather dependent and thus produce electricity when we don’t need it and not enough when we do:

neon.energy/Hirth-2013-Mar…
Another reason is because they require so much land:

michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/finally-they…
Still another reason is their unreliability

All in all, seven years after passage, consumers in the 29 states had paid $125.2 billion more for electricity than they would have in the absence of renewable energy mandates policy

forbes.com/sites/michaels…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Shellenberger

Michael Shellenberger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ShellenbergerMD

2 May
New research from Princeton University and Bloomberg confirms that renewables require 300 - 400 times more land than natural gas and nuclear plants

Finally They Admit Renewables Are Terrible For The Environment

My latest for Substack. Please share!

michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/finally-they…
Over the last few years, I have been pushing back against the idea that renewables are good for the environment.

In 2019 I published, “Why Renewables Can’t Save the Planet,” which was the most-read article of the year at Quillette.

quillette.com/2019/02/27/why…
And I gave a TEDx talk by the same name which today has 2.5 million views.

Read 11 tweets
1 May
“The idea that we’re a cancer on the planet—well, what do you do with cancer? You eradicate it. I’ve heard environmentally sensitive types say that, and it’s horrifying. They’re completely blind to what they’re saying. If they weren’t blind to it, they’d be traumatized by it.”
“Is this de­sire to de­stroy a sign of some twisted spir­i­tual long­ing?”

“I think so,” said Jordan Peterson. “The peo­ple who car­i­ca­ture West­ern so­ci­ety as a pa­tri­archy, and then de­scribe it as evil, they’re pos­sessed by a re­li­gious idea.”
I agree:

“The trouble with the new environmental religion is that it has become increasingly apocalyptic, destructive, and self-defeating. It leads its adherents to demonize their opponents, often hypocritically.”
Read 8 tweets
27 Apr
Renewable energy advocates said that cheap solar panels meant California's electricity prices would stop rising

That was a lie

California's electricity prices will rise more than 50% by 2030

California electric prices rose 42% - 78% between 2010 and 2020

Shocking new data
"We are in a rate crisis with electricity costs growing faster than inflation, inequity rising, & wildfire costs coming," said the public advocate at the Cal Public Utilities Commission

California rates increased 7x more than they did in rest of US

utilitydive.com/news/californi…
California is the Democrats' climate model for the rest of the US, even though it has the sixth highest electricity prices in the U.S., which hurts the poor most, and suffers blackouts due to over-reliance on weather-dependent energies

forbes.com/sites/michaels…
Read 4 tweets
23 Apr
@USWeatherExpert @davey1233 @swansandsable The Financial Times's @Grepsul investigated nuclear economics last year came to same conclusion: standardization lowers costs and innovation raises it

ft.com/content/c06524…
@USWeatherExpert @davey1233 @swansandsable @Grepsul "Only by sticking firmly to the same specification, engineers and builders could you drive down construction costs. This 'learning by doing' could lead to meaningful reductions."
@USWeatherExpert @davey1233 @swansandsable @Grepsul "Having swallowed the hefty 'first of a kind' (FOAK) costs — see Hinkley and Flamanville — and invested in the supply chain to build the latest big “practical” reactors (after a 30-year nuclear hiatus), countries such as the UK should build large 'cookie-cutter' fleets."
Read 7 tweets
22 Apr
Democrats must stop sacrificing good American nuclear jobs for cheap Chinese solar panels

THREAD

forbes.com/sites/michaels…
The Biden Administration is promoting the participation of Chinese President Xi Jinping in a White House climate summit at a time when Congress is considering whether or not to halt the import of solar panels from China for human rights reasons.
“China’s Solar Dominance Presents Biden With an Ugly Dilemma,” read the @nytimes headline of an article published yesterday. “President Biden’s vow to work with China on issues like climate change is clashing with his promise to defend human rights.”

nytimes.com/2021/04/20/bus…
Read 51 tweets
20 Apr
Democrats in Congress point to blackouts in Texas & California as reason to increase subsidies for renewables, but anyone concerned about extreme weather should want *less* reliance on weather-dependent energy sources, not more.

My latest @Forbes!

forbes.com/sites/michaels…
@Forbes Both the heat-driven August 2020 electricity shortage in California, and the cold-driven February 2021 shortage in Texas, were caused by over-reliance, not under-reliance, on weather-dependent renewables like solar panels and wind turbines.
@Forbes Thus, any effort by the federal government to make states more dependent on renewables would likely increase not decrease the probability and frequency of blackouts.
Read 49 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!