I think I found patient zero or the missing link for Fonerite reconstruction historiography. James G. Blaine's memoir of his time as a Republican congressional rep for Maine and eventually a senator from 1861 to 1881. This memoir contains a large amount of political/ 
historical analysis of reconstruction and its shocking how much it resembles all the post 1960's/70's reconstruction literature in its extreme radical liberal political views and even loud virtue signaling about the downtrodden freedmen. Especially during the time of
reconstruction itself, historians like Claude Bowers were quick to point out, that most radical Republican politicians that loudly proclaimed themselves to be crusaders for the rights and dignity of the freedmen were usually just anti-southern and vindictive as when these
same reps were called out about the lack of rights and liberties for the blacks or racial minorities who existed in their own district or states, they would clam up and say "well, that's different". I will try and retweet it, but I did a pretty good suggested
readings list/historiography for reconstruction a while back - (its certainly my fav type of historiography as I find the historiography of reconstruction to be almost as interesting as the era/historical events itself) - which gets into alot of the older turn of the century
literature, that was critical of the radicalism, vindictiveness, furtherance of sectional strife as well as constitutional/legal and even race/human nature issues inherent with radical reconstruction. If you are looking for older histories of reconstruction that are critical
of it, look up Burgess, Dunning, Bowers, Rhodes, Garner, Simkins, and Coulter in relation to historical research on southern reconstruction. @Irkutyanin1 You might be interested in the first book I posted. I think I remember you being interested in older reconstruction literature
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
