Detente: The Vital Word Missing From Discourse On Russia And China
A recent 60 Minutes interview with Tony Blinken illustrates the way the concept of detente (the easing of hostilities between nations) is being deliberately hidden from public awareness. caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/detente-the-…
On a recent 60 Minutes interview with Norah O'Donnell, US Secretary of State Tony Blinken talked about the United States as a defender of the rules-based international order and the importance of bringing Beijing into compliance with it.
"Our purpose is not to contain China, to hold it back, to keep it down: it is to uphold this rules-based order that China is posing a challenge to," Blinken said. "Anyone who poses a challenge to that order, we’re going to stand up and defend it."
Now, had Blinken been speaking to an actual journalist, he would have been asked in what specific ways defending "the rules-based order" against China would differ from trying to contain China and keep it down.
He would have also been asked what business a nation that has killed millions and displaced tens of millions in illegal wars just since the turn of this century while starving civilians with sanctions and blockades has proclaiming itself the defender of any "rules-based order".
But Blinken was not talking to a journalist. Blinken was talking to Norah O'Donnell.
O'Donnell's interview with Blinken was a perfect illustration of the fact that modern mainstream reporters are only allowed to ask confrontational foreign policy questions of US officials when demanding to know why they aren't being more hawkish and aggressive.
Here are some of the insanely hawkish questions Blinken was asked during the 60 Minutes interview: state.gov/secretary-anto…
At no point is Blinken ever confronted about the many glaring plot holes in the US government's Xinjiang "genocide" narrative, or the indications we are seeing that there is a propaganda campaign designed to advance western geostrategic agendas.
At no point is Blinken ever asked if China acting "so assertive or aggressive militarily" might have something to do with the fact that the US has been aggressively surrounding it with military forces for years. caityjohnstone.medium.com/the-coming-war…
And at no point is Blinken ever asked by O'Donnell what measures can be taken to move away from this dangerous trajectory in pursuit of detente.
It's like the very concept of detente doesn't even exist. Like it's not even considered an option. Like people are being kept ignorant that it's an option.
And one gets the sense that this is entirely by design. The late Stephen Cohen, renowned scholar and expert on US-Russia relations, used the word "detente" constantly until his death last year,
...but in the preceding years as things began heating up with Russia Cohen had been finding his analysis less and less welcome on mainstream channels. consortiumnews.com/2020/09/20/ste…
For the same reason Norah O'Donnell only asked Blinken how he was going to escalate aggressions against China and never how he was going to de-escalate them, the mainstream media are keeping the general public ignorant of the possibility of, and dire necessity for, detente.
We are meant to take it as a given that the only option available is to continue increasing aggressions with these two nuclear powers. This is a lie, and it is insane. Detente absolutely is an option.
We do not need to keep risking all life on earth with this psychotic game of nuclear Russian roulette every day just because a few powerful sociopaths have decided the US empire must retain supremacy at all cost. caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/the-rising-t…
There is no valid reason why we cannot all get along and spend our energy collaborating toward human thriving.
I am often accused of having sinister loyalties to the Kremlin or to the Communist Party of China--which one depends on the day and what I happen to be writing about at the time.
Detente: The Vital Word Missing From Discourse On Russia And China (Audio)
"We are meant to take it as a given that the only option available is to continue increasing aggressions with these two nuclear powers. This is a lie, and it is insane." soundcloud.com/going_rogue/de…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Capitalism is a misanthropic, dystopian ideology. Its proponents always talk about "human nature" as greedy and selfish, which is complete bullshit that only feels true to a greedy, selfish person. But it's also a self-fulfilling prophecy that creates the world it describes.
Because capitalism cultists believe human nature is greedy and selfish, they cannot imagine any solutions to our world's problems that aren't driven by greed and selfishness. That's why they're holding out hope that we'll all be saved by greedy, selfish parasites like Elon Musk.
Someone who's always projecting their own greed and selfishness onto everyone else will scoff and dismiss the idea that we can transcend our self-destructive patterning and move into a collaborative relationship with each other and with our ecosystem. They see it as impossible.
People believe we can just snip humans out of their ecosystemic context to colonize space for the same reason they believe in rugged individualism: they don't grasp how inseparably interconnected each human is. With our ecosystem, and with our society. Separation is an illusion.
We are not separable from our ecosystem. We ARE our ecosystem. We're so inseparably one with our ecosystem that, as Alan Watts once said, we need to send astronauts into space with a little box of it or else they will die. Space colonization will never happen.
People assume space colonization is part of our future primarily because science fiction takes this as a given. But science fiction is fiction, written to entertain and appeal to the same ego which imagines it is separate from the rest of the world. It's an illusory premise.
Every positive change in human behavior, individually or collectively, has been preceded by an increase in awareness. Anything you can do toward this end makes a difference, whether it's spreading awareness through a conversation, a tweet, or street graffiti. Your efforts matter.
One doesn't end an addiction or self-destructive behavior until they become conscious of the inner dynamics feeding into it. Societal illnesses don't end until people become conscious of how wrong they are. Dysfunction and consciousness can't coexist. Your efforts matter.
All that is wrong with our world is the result of human unconsciousness. All that is good in our world is the result of an expansion of consciousness. Anything you can do to help make even a tiny part of humanity a tiny bit more conscious of the truth makes the world better.
"It’s not surprising that Australians might look with horror on such a conflict. There’s no way for anyone to 'win' a war between America and China. A conventional clash could easily end up going nuclear, with the US still reserving its right to first use of these weapons"
Sometimes I think the Yanks would better understand why I write about their government's escalations against China if they lived a little closer to the front line.
"If China chose to retaliate to such an attack without directly attacking the American mainland, hitting a US ally like Australia would be an option."
They still believe the Russian bounties story because they were told to believe it over and over again by the media outlets they trust, and were not told to STOP believing it over and over again by those same media outlets after it was completely discredited. As usual.
Same reason they still think they were vindicated for all that shrieking about Russian collusion. They were blasted in the face with it for years, and then the outlets which did this failed to sit them down and explain how completely discredited those claims turned out to be.
I still to this day get shitlibs telling me "Read the Mueller report!" even though the Mueller report completely discredits the Russian collusion narrative. Not one American was ever indicted for conspiracy with the Kremlin. They don't know this because no one told them.
a metric which describes the increased lifespan of a sociopath due to lack of stress from empathy
"I know John Bolton is old but he's not that old in Kissinger years"
Sociopaths don't experience stress like we do. They actually seek out the sensation of stress. It's called "sensation seeking." They *enjoy* the chaos; it doesn't exhaust them or make them sick, it energizes them. Keep this in mind when thinking about US foreign policy.
This is why assholes like Kissinger live forever and the ones who care the most wear themselves out young.