Tomorrow the US is gonna try to amp up their atrocity propaganda campaign with a "Nayirah Testimony" performance in Congress.

Here's some short notes on Nayirah, Millward, Turkel, and Ziyawudun!
"Nayirah Testimony" refers to a witness account given before the US Congressional Human Rights Caucus on 1990 by a girl that went only by Nayirah.

She claimed that she had witnessed Iraqi soldiers take babies out of incubators, taken the incubators, and left babies to die.
Her story was initially corroborated by Amnesty International, a still-famous and "prestigious" British NGO.

Executive director John Healey subsequently accused the Bush administration of "opportunistic manipulation of the international human rights movement." 😄
In reality, Nayirah was the daughter of Saud Al-Sabah, the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States.

Her testimony was organized as part of the "Citizens for a Free Kuwait" PR campaign, run by the American public relations firm Hill & Knowlton for the Kuwaiti government.
The testimony aired on ABC and NBC, reaching 35-53 million Americans.

Seven senators cited Nayirah's testimony in their speeches backing the use of force.

Bush repeated the story at least ten times in the following weeks to rally enthusiasm for the 1990-91 Invasion of Iraq.
So, what about today? Who's "Nury Turkel"?

Commissioner for the US's Commision on International Religious Freedom, appointed by Nancy Pelosi and trained in Washington DC.

He usually just gets meekly introduced as a "Human Rights Activist," though.
I always remember Nury Turkel because he went on to @theintercept for a nasty little softball interview with Mehdi Hasan, where none of his shady associations where revelead but they did gush about his totally-not-suspicious bipartisan DC consensus!
It's seriously too much. 😄

"Uyghur human rights advocate Nury Turkel"

"I give a lot of credit to others, Pompeo, Mike Pence, and some senators like Rubio."

"You'll be hard pressed to find one issue that can even receive 220 votes, let alone 407 votes."
@LukewSavage has a nice article on that, actually.

What kind of "issues" receive bipartisan support in the US, historically?
currentaffairs.org/2018/01/the-cu…
What about Millward?

Millward is a complete hack, and he just repeats what he's told by the press but cited as an independent expert.

You may remember him for the embarrassing BBC non-story about the "Uyghur model" a while back.
Once again the BBC tried to weave a heart-tugging sob story, cynically trying drawing parallels between the strife of Black people in the US and the Uyghur propaganda hackjob, but even the most cursory investigations gave the game up:
This is how "Academics" in the business of regime change work. They're not smart or scrupulous, pretty skittish and cowardly in fact, so they spill the beans when pressed.

They get away with this to the extent that people are too scared to question them.
We finally get to the testimony of Tursunay Ziyawudun. It's changed quite a bit over the last year or so!

February 2020: "Freedom of speech was infringed." buzzfeednews.com/article/meghar…
February 2021: "Gang rape and torture of women."
China apparently has the most iron-tight information lock-down in history, with not a single old-fashioned camera capturing a non-digital screenshot of the atrocities... but they keep making silly mistakes like giving atrocity witnesses visas!

D-oh!
Anyway, I hope anyone who reads this thread feels confident challenging and scrutinizing it no matter how good of a performance they all give up there.

If you haven't read this, please take the time to do so:
If you feel like the case is "too hot," then start by taking a look at an older one:
And if you're trying to understand why someone would do this, give fake testimony and so on, then read this:
If you want more on other Uyghurs, and especially on the "Human Rights Industry" at large, definitely check out this thread:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Roderic Day

Roderic Day Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RodericDay

26 Apr
The author of the fake Deng quote showed up!

She called us "tankies" and condescended to us for exposing her reference-free academic malpractice. 😄

Congrats to all the people reproducing her falsehoods.

This is Western Marxist Academia. Image
I wrote about the role played by anticommunist academic gatekeepers here:
It's all a joke to these people. Image
Read 5 tweets
26 Apr
Read literally two paragraphs after the quoted excerpt.

As I keep pointing out:

"Ultra" leftists are literally just anarchists, the exact kind of Utopian Socialists that Engels is denouncing in this exact work.
marxists.org/archive/marx/w… Image
Read the condescension with which these worms in the imperial core refer to Chinese workers.

Their opinions are mere obstacles to Western "left" narratives in which they're expected to feature only as brainless victims waiting to be saved.
ImageImage
"Poggers."

These really are absolutely detestable people.
Read 4 tweets
26 Apr
This is not a real quote by Deng Xiaoping.

It was literally invented by McKenzie Wark, radlib academic that teaches at the anti-communist "New School" in NYC, author of radlib works like "Gamer Theory" and "A Hacker Manifesto."

So, let's talk about fake quotations a bit.
Some people are taken aback that I call the New School anti-communist.

I use the word in the sense used by Michael Parenti in "Left Anticommunism: the unkindest cut," of utopian western "socialists" building careers out of denouncing Stalin and China.
greanvillepost.com/2018/10/06/lef…
Why yes, I read "theory."

How could you tell? Image
Read 4 tweets
26 Apr
I'm looking at the Wikiquote page for Deng Xiaoping.

There's only a handful of quotes! Let's see how they aged. Image
"It doesn't matter whether the cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice." (1977)

Definitely a classic. Not much to say here.
"The United States brags about its political system, but the [American] President says one thing during the election, something else when he takes office, something else at midterm and something else when he leaves." (1987)

US "democracy" is such an embarrassment.
Read 13 tweets
31 Mar
Every newcomer to Marxism and communist history needs to understand that many of the current "gatekeepers" of Marxism in the West — historians, professors, and university students — are completely worthless careerists.

Check out this garbage on Wikipedia by Tristram Hunt: ImageImageImage
Marxism, or whatever else we call it, simply doesn't belong to these ghouls. It never has and it never will.

If you work — if you don't live off of rents — Marx and Engels and others were writing for *you*, and you don't need these anti-communist "interpreters." ImageImageImageImage
People like Hunt and Bessner go around embedding themselves into the conversation as middle-men, as ventriloquists and sheepdogs.

They de-fang the work or, worse, use it to smash international solidarity.

They are, frankly speaking, vicious counter-revolutionary pieces of shit.
Read 5 tweets
28 Mar
Another question for non-"tankie" followers:

Some people seem to believe that the US wouldn't dress up right wing propaganda points in Marxist terminology to push them onto communist circles, as if it a magic spell stopped them from lying this way.

Why? What's the logic here?
There's this strange reticence, as if someone writing down "capitalism bad" was a binding covenant, after which everything else written had to be sincere.

As if being a communist had magical properties one simply couldn't lie about (unless Chinese).
A slew of radlibs has tried to defend Byler on the basis that they absolutely love what he wrote for Chuang.

Can someone explain to me the appeal of regurgitating Falun Gong propaganda like this?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(