In which the CEO of $1.5 billion publicly traded company $BLNK admits under oath he could not until recently afford living expenses—after a cascade of well-documented prior pump-and-dump failures. Lucky for him, this one appears to be working so far. plainsite.org/dockets/4hjmyo…
This affidavit references *another* lawsuit that is impossible to find with a normal search because the court clerk included an extra comma in the title.
THE DMV IMPROPERLY REDACTED ITS RELEASED DOCUMENTS.
The white text reads: "Elon’s tweet does not match engineering reality per CJ."
CJ Moore, on the call, is $TSLA Director, Autopilot Software.
Or was.
Aside from the implications involving Autopilot, this represents written evidence *from a $TSLA employee* of yet another violation of Elon Musk's 2018 SEC Consent Decree (and likely Tesla's as well).
The new incredible reporting by @juliacarriew at the @GuardianUS is not getting nearly enough attention. $FB doesn't just have billions of fake accounts—it has fake Pages posing as accounts, per former employee Sophie Zhang. These have been used to influence elections worldwide.
@juliacarriew@GuardianUS Journalists like @mariaressa have had their lives turned upside-down while $FB deliberately sat and watched as its platform destroyed democracy in countries like the Philippines. Only when the United States looked like it might be involved did they start to care.
Isn't Jim Cramer lucky. The SEC somehow lost the FOIA appeal about his file for a year and a half, and didn't notice until specifically asked about it.
Utter incompetence.
Clowns.
The SEC has ruled that there is no "relevant public interest" in anyone knowing whether or not Jim Cramer has a SEC investigative file. According to the Commission, Jim's privacy is more important. So @jimcramer, do you have a file or not? Can your viewers see it?
$TSLA shill Johnna Crider claims, alluding to PlainSite, that we somehow revealed information about $TSLA fan Earl Banning that he did not want public. This is false. Banning openly told the world his name and more in October 2018. Listen for yourself.
This is yet another example of selective First Amendment fundamentalism predicated on groupthink. While $TSLA fans are allowed to speak their names openly, anyone who questions the company is guilty of "doxxing" as soon as they reference the same exact already-spoken words.
Crider has repeated this false claim time and again. If she repeats it yet again, it will still be false.
Does getting sued for civil harassment and libel under California law count as "quality" "prior feedback?" This describes at least one of $TSLA's "non-employee participants."
Does the official $TSLA line to the California DMV sound like the public narrative emanating from Elon Musk and his proxies, especially Whole Mars Blog? Or the opposite?