An Undistorted View Of January 6, 2021
📌Trump did not incite any violence
📌Trump behaved atrociously after the protesters stormed the Capitol and turned violent
📌Democrats and the media concocted a false "insurrection" narrative by blaming unrelated deaths on Capitol rioting
There's a reason most Americans may never get an undistorted version of the history of that day. The minute-by-minute timeline of events is critical for an accurate understanding of what really transpired that day. And no prominent voice seems both willing and able to provide it.
So much happened on January 6, 2021, that with the slightest partisan inclination or bias toward one player or another, any historian can write a deeply heartfelt objective account of that day which will still be completely misleading, if you skip over just a few crucial details.
A true account of that day will be hard to come by because a true account would reflect poorly on the entire leadership of the nation -- GOP, Democrats, media, intelligence agencies, Capitol police, DC governance. Everyone was culpable. Everyone should hang their head in shame.
Of the five deaths commonly blamed on the riot, only one, that of 35-year-old U.S. Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt who was shot by a Capitol Police Officer, has been ruled a homicide.
The other four deaths weren’t the result of any injury sustained during the battle between protesters and law enforcement officials.
Benjamin Phillips and Kevin Greeson died of natural causes, a medical examiner ruled in April.
Rosanne Boyland, who initial reports claimed had been crushed to death by the pro-Trump mob, died from a drug overdose.
And Capitol Hill Police Officer Brian Sicknick, whose death was originally attributed to “injuries suffered during the riot,” suffered two strokes after the protest and died of natural causes, Francisco Diaz, the chief medical examiner in Washington, D.C., announced.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
GOP has a mail-in voting problem. GOP will lose many more elections mindlessly unless it recognizes that mass mail-in voting is here to stay, embraces it wholeheartedly, and fixes what makes it so fraud-prone.
Contd.
2. Republicans: Please stop butting your heads against the wall on broad-scale voting by mail. There is nothing you can do to stop mail-in ballots from being a regular feature of future elections. Nor should you. Mail-in ballots are not the problem. Fraud is. Fix the latter.
3. Accept and welcome mail-in voting. Until Republicans leaders do that, they will have a self-imposed disadvantage against the Democrats that is mindless and hurtful without any redeeming qualities whatsoever. Don't penalize voters for systemic process problems that need fixing.
Census data show a lower black-white turnout disparity in Georgia than in New Jersey.
2. "We have classic voter suppression,” declared Kamala Harris last fall, and Democrats keep making the charge. Yet new Census voting data show these claims are as meritless as what the Democrats refer to as The Big Lie.
3. Census figures released Thursday show that turnout in 2020 reached a near-historic high for a presidential election, with 66.8% of voting-age citizens casting ballots—0.9 percentage-points shy of the 1992 record.
The topic evokes raw emotions. Suspend them for a moment. This is a serious thread on the simplest way to fix most of the potential election fraud that is currently possible in our vote-counting processes. State legislatures should pay attention.
2. The U.S. today has a system in almost all the States (with rare but relatively small exceptions) that rigorously defies fraud detection and correction for mail-in ballots. This has happened because of the noble objective of making the mail-in ballot rigorously 'secret.'
3. The requirement for a 'secret ballot' is certainly not in the U.S. Constitution. It is just a method broadly adopted by all the States to forestall attempts at voter intimidation, blackmailing, and vote buying. All really good. But it also causes an intractable problem.
2. "Our nation's youth do not need activist indoctrination that fixates solely on past flaws and [sows divisiveness]. Taxpayer-supported programs should emphasize the shared civic virtues that bring us together, not push radical agendas that tear us apart."
3. "Your Proposed Priorities applaud the New York Times's "1619 Project." This campaign to "reframe the country's history, understanding 1619 as our true founding" has become infamous for putting ill-informed advocacy ahead of historical accuracy."
1. Deceptive Economic Analysis from London School of Economics
The analysis referred to in this article, based on a paper by David Hope, practices gross deception in the service of promoting Biden's misinformed and misguided tax-and-spend plans. cbsnews.com/amp/news/tax-c…
2. Allow me to debunk it by pointing out key deceptive tactics deployed and by referring to a more accurate analysis of historical data.
Two key deceptive tricks used are:
(a) time frame chosen (starting at 1965 instead of 1930)(b) Measures used (not GDP, but per capita GDP)
3. The article says, "Per capita gross domestic product and unemployment rates were nearly identical after five years in countries that slashed taxes on the rich and in those that didn't."
A powerful rebuttal to Joe Biden’s big government agenda.
Hallelujah!
2. WSJ Editorial Board penned a very clear and concise summary of the key message Sen. Tim Scott delivered in response to the big government message President Biden delivered to a joint session of Congress. wsj.com/articles/tim-s…
3. The worst job in Washington is delivering the out-of-power party’s rebuttal to a President’s address to Congress. Invariably the poor soul looks small in comparison to a POTUS addressing all branches of government and the nation from the well of the House.