(1) I used to admire Mitch McConnell for his experience and ability but now he says dumb things like "one hundred percent" of his focus is on "stopping this new administration." Dude could have stopped them getting into office by:
(2) By actually standing up to Trump when it mattered, eg during 2020 when Trump was on a political suicide mission by:
>downplaying the pandemic regularly
>enabling, encouraging, and condoning sedition ahead of 1/6.
(3) Trump's biggest blunder in office (and the competition was tough) was not taking the pandemic seriously enough from the start.
For example if #Qdroxychloroquine was so great, why isn't the government of India handing it out to their people?
(4) Every criticism Trump has made of his opponents can be turned back around on him. It is projection.
The totality of his pandemic related actions and omissions is why he lost the 2020 election. Then during Dec-Jan the US had a massive wave of Covid deaths. He ignored it.
(5) The carnage in India is undeniable. A similar manmade disaster in Brazil.
Modi and Bolsonaro downplayed the pandemic, refused to "go hard and early" with the right kind of lockdowns when they would do the most good.
(6) But but "lockdowns don't work" the Q mass delusion sufferers cry.
They work very well, when used appropriately. Australia and New Zealand have prevented disaster by going "hard and early." We can freely travel between the two countries atm. Cook Islands about to join, too.
(7) Mitch McConnell is one of the R Senators with the most blood on his hands, concerning his utter failure to speak up against Trump, until 1/6... and even then, he backtracked as soon as he could.
Sedition is still the enemy, Mitch. Not the Dem admin (for now.)
(8) The cowardice of Senators like McConnell is why enough doubt grew in the minds of Georgia voters to hand two senate seats, and thereby an effective majority, to the Democrats.
Why should voters support any of the cowardly Rs, unless & until they're held accountable for 1/6?
(9) I happen to agree with some of the current D policies (and I prob still would have when I was under the MAGA spell, too. I kept some of my Indy views, thank God.)
The policies I disagree with? Tough luck, thanks to Trump & his sycophants, for throwing it all away.
17 extremely brave and self-sacrificing R elected officials stood with Rep Liz Cheney against the cowardice of their R colleagues. They provide hope for the future of the country, & party.
(12) “The indifference shown to my colleagues and I is disgraceful.” Officer Michael Fanone, MPDC
Fanone mentions "hearing those who continue to downplay the events of that day."
Trump feeds the points to his followers, who repeat them here EVERY time I mention 1/6.
(12) Unlike McConnell, 100% of MY focus is on seeking accountability for 1/6 from Trump & his allies, whose actions AND OMISSIONS enabled, encouraged, & condoned the terrorist attack.
Downplaying it to me is dumb, because I know the details, and you don't. It's that simple.
(13) ADDENDUM
My thread ends with tweet (12) but because I don't write here very often now, I'm going to add some examples of GQP stupidity below, in case some readers don't believe me when I say how deluded they are.
Well said, @DonnaLeeSun. I have the same approach.
Donna is "Unapologretically Canadian."
I am Unapologetically New Zealander/Kiwi. Granted, "sorry" has a special meaning in Canada, eh? But our countries do have a lot in common. Mini-thread:
I really get what Donna is saying in her Twitter bio:
"Trumpism has a strong foothold in Canada & we ignore it at our peril. Pay attention, esp. to PP, former PM Harper & idiot Premiers!"
The same is true of New Zealand, Australia, and our OG mothership: The UK.
PP stands for Pierre Poilievre, who became the leader of Canada's conservative party on 10 September 2022.
For me it's super simple: Far right extremism gained a foothold in the US, only to be rejected by majorities of voters multiple times since. Because #DemocracyWins.
Evidently, my above use of the term misogyny has triggered a few of them.
They're trying to insinuate that Kohberger was a liberal which, even if true, would have nothing to do with the points made in my tweet. We already know several things about him, and his crimes...
Further, when writing the above list of 5 known and/or confirmed misogynists, some of whom have killed at least one woman, I considered a range of factors that put them on that list.
I want to encourage discussion about misogny and the targeting of women by violent offenders.
Esp. the 2020 US presidential election, and others where right wing governments were (and will soon be) punished for anti- public health and safety, anti-science, ignorant approaches to pandemic response.
Do politicians and their advisers get this yet? In most households, it is one or more women who take basic health and safety seriously, & who develop a superior knowledge base due to our more complex biology, higher rates of illness, & greater need for infection control measures.
Of course there are many men with the same health knowledge and risk management priorities as women, but we are talking about "in general" here, and how that applies to elections.
Gotta laugh, my tweet generated the following reply from a maga account:
"Ukraine flag in bio"
Ad hominem/genetic fallacy is all they have. They deflect by targeting the player not the ball. Because playing the ball is too hard for them. It requires honesty & courage.
I'm talking about changing the way domestic violence incidents are handled, and doing more to put long term distance between known DV offenders and their legal access to guns.
An idea best espoused by the outstanding @BeauTFC. Link to follow.
The outstanding @BeauTFC talked about this issue here:
I wonder what price between $8 billion and $44 billion Elon Howard Hughes Musk might consider to sell this vital pro-democracy communications hub before he completely destroys it.
I mean, that's his goal, right?
He paid waaaay too much for it. Value currently estimated at $8 billion. Surely there are billionaires out there with the ability to build a consortium to entice it out of his grubby little hands?
There's a good argument for the US federal government buying it, too...
Or a group of countries. It's not all about the US, you know.
What does the Putin regime have on Musk, that could get him to over-spend so much money? The global fascist movement is the only winner out of this. Or was it the Mercers?