Keep Current with Mark Hazard 🏴󠁧󠁒󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡³

Mark Hazard 🏴󠁧󠁒󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡³ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarkHazard2020

8 May
Labour Party may be charged with taking its traditional working class support for granted whilst pandering to urban youth, a minority of whom, admittedly, were at least born into the working class. Labour went into #GE2017 pledged to scrap universal university tuition fees ...
... on its first day in office and with a perceived intent to, at some point, write off outstanding student debt, incurred to pay for tuition fees. Only a minority of 18 to 21 year olds go to university, a disproportionate number of them are drawn from the middle and upper class.
In comparison, Labour had no hard edged pledges on education for the many whose offspring do not expect to go to university. In prioritising scrapping fees, Labour pandered not just to urban youth, but also their families etc. It also planned to leave in place Β£7bn out of Β£9bn ..
Read 52 tweets
18 Apr
When one joins the Civil Service, one enters the membership of a club.

A club with traditions, good and bad, going back centuries.

Its past members include Sir Geoffrey Chaucer, Sir Thomas More, Thomas Cromwell and Samuel Pepys.

Truly one stands on the shoulders of giants.
And it is a club one never leaves, even on exiting the employment of the Civil Service.

The code of omerta still very much applies, even in retirement.

GOD these days, in that other place, those Elysian Fields, sets us a good example.
Hodges, when you smear one of us, you insult all of us.

We are not journalists we are a family.
Read 10 tweets
16 Apr
Having read the Blueprint for Children’s Social Care John Seddon wrote the following letter to people listed as interviewees. Tis relevant to note that every reply John received stated clearly interviewee did not concur with the report’s recommendations.

thefrontline.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
"I’m writing to you because you were listed as an interviewee in A Blueprint for Children’s Social Care: Unlocking the potential of social work. Your listing as interviewee suggests you might concur with the report’s recommendations, but I am aware some of the interviewees don't.
I read the Blueprint owing to reading about the controversy surrounding its authorship in Private Eye. My first concern was that the Blueprint portrayed the UK pilots of Buurtzorg as successful.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(