The great work by @ajmyers214 @EricGimon and @oboylemm of @EnergyInnovLLC inspired me to do a little blog and some back-of-the-envelope calculations based on their latest study on the #coalcrossover...
🧵🚨!
blog.ucsusa.org/joseph-daniel/…
1/x
So, the amazing work speaks for itself, so if you haven't read the full report, go do that. Right now.
energyinnovation.org/publication/th…

2/x
Okay, now that you are back... The first thing I did after reading the report was open the work papers and dig through the data. I assume that is SOP for most of #energytwitter.
3/x
What I found fascinating was just how cost-effective replacing coal with clean is. Investing $29 million per year in clean energy (annualized capital costs + annual O&M) helps us avoid over $35 million in costs associated with burning coal. 4/x
Like most CBA, that's all the costs and most of the benefits and it still passes with flying colors! We could actually save customers $6.5 BILLION by shutting down dirty uneconomic coal and replacing it with clean affordable energy! (way to burry the lead, EI) 5/x
What's more, anyone that has ever heard @JigarShahDC talk about this issue knows that the transition to clean energy is a huge potential to create wealth! And this study really goes to show it! This is a wealth-building opportunity on multiple levels... 6/x
First off, that $6.5 billion in savings means $6.5 billion in freed-up expenses for families and businesses to invest. Or, for many families, to spend on important things that they can't currently afford. 7/x
Second, replacing coal with clean energy requires a huge investment. Investments that local communities and families can (and should) go be able to invest in and make a return on investment!
8/x
Right now, burning coal only creates wealth for the wealthy corporate shareholders and c-suites of electric utilities and coal mining companies. Coal mining companies have literally extracted the wealth out of poor communities in Central Appalachia for more than a century. 9/x
Community solar, rooftop solar, residential DR, residential & commercial energy efficiency... these clean energy products are inherently investments in local families, local communities, and local businesses. 10/x
And third, there are tons of US-based start-ups in the energy space. Lots of great investment to be done in this space! Meanwhile, coal investment is... struggling. 11/x
Obviously, I know that all of these calculations are simplifications. If you want to think of them as upper/lower limits that's fine by me. They still tell the more important story: replacing coal-fired power with clean energy makes sense today. Not in 2030 or 2035. Today! fin.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joe Daniel

Joe Daniel Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @electronecon

26 Jun 20
Okay, this opinion piece by @SecBrouillette is so full of errors I am afraid to even try to point out all of them. So here is the deal: I'll try and you can tell me which ones I miss... Thread 🚨🚨🚨 1/x
@SecBrouillette starts w/ suggesting coal is “rock solid” and renewables aren’t reliable. A lot to unpack here. 1) coal plant reliability (both forced and unforced outage rates) has been on the incline. Coal is actually getting less reliable with each passing year. 2/
The Secretary points to the 2019 Polar Vortex as an indication of coal’s reliability but ironically in the 2018 Polar Vortex, the only reliability issues stemmed from coal plants and the coal supply chain. See this NERC report: nerc.com/pa/rrm/January… 3/
Read 19 tweets
28 May 20
Hey #EnergyTwitter

I'm proud to present: Used But How Useful. How Electric Utilities Exploit Loopholes, Forcing Customers to Bail Out Uneconomic Coal-Fired Power Plants.

It represents the culmination of years of work on behalf of myself and my co-authors.
Thread alert 🚨 1/?
First off, I have to thank my manager at UCS (Jeff Deyette). I started analyzing the issue of uneconomic coal before I came to UCS and even though analyzing the issue wasn't in my work plan Jeff gave me the agency and autonomy to pursue this work. 2/?
Okay, now onto the juicy bits...
One of the principal shortcomings of past analyses is that they failed to account for what resources would replace coal if it wasn't dispatched. So UCS applied its considerable modeling capacity to analyze the issue.
3/
Read 6 tweets
24 Feb 20
New blog alert 🚨🚨🚨: The Real Reason Coal Plants Have to Cycle.
TL/DR: the current rhetoric of renewables scapegoating is unjustified. Coal plants have to cycle but not b/c of renewables but b/c economics, they are now a load-following resource. 1/x
blog.ucsusa.org/joseph-daniel/…
This new blog was supported by great new data assembled by UCS associate analyst Ashtin Massie. It shows clearly that coal plants are cycling daily to follow load. 2/x
This is, of course, a natural progression of my earlier blog outline the fact that coal is no longer baseload. 3/ blog.ucsusa.org/joseph-daniel/…
Read 8 tweets
16 Jan 20
My latest blog went up yesterday and I'll admit, it is on the longer side. So, here is a TL/DR summary tweetstorm.
Thread alert 🚨🚨🚨 1/
blog.ucsusa.org/joseph-daniel/…
I'll start off acknowledging there have been a number of attempts (state and federal) to bailout "baseload coal plants" for all sorts of specious reasons. This is no bogus excuse takedown. I wanted to figure out: is coal even baseload anymore? 2/
These graphs (h/t @SynapseEnergy) illustrate how grid planners and operators used to think of the grid. Baseload resources were high CapX low OpX, peakers where low CapX, high OpX, either could be built and profitable depending on what the grid needed. 3/ synapse-energy.com/sites/default/…
Read 12 tweets
11 Jan 20
10 years ago was the height of the great recession, unemployment had just hit 10%, and yet 10 years ago today is when I chose to quit my job. So, here is why I left the oil and gas industry, a thread.
Thread 🚨🚨🚨 1/???
That morning started like most morning, got to the refinery before 8AM, put on my Nomex coveralls and hard hat and went to go find the senior staffer to give him the news...
My colleague John was smoking at the refinery we were working at, which was and remains the largest refinery in Hawaii. John’s smoking spot was located inside the fence line but far enough from the raw crude oil and refined products as to not cause concern for explosion. 3/
Read 30 tweets
10 Jan 20
Apparently, folks love them threads on utility dockets. So here is another one you might have missed you beautiful energy nerds: The issue of self-commitment coal has gone west and comes up in this PacifiCorp case in CA!
(Docket No. A.19-08-002)
1/
The @SierraClub hired @StrategenNews to review the fuel cost recovery request from PacifiCorp. Now I'm not that familiar with the rules of the wild west but so far as I can tell this isn't much different than a regulated fuel cost recover docket for an IOU in a reg state... 2/
Quick lay of the land: Several coal plants have FUEL costs over $25/MWh (Cholla, Jim Bridger, and Naughton). That's even before you start taking on enviro controls! For comparison, mrk purchases are about $25, Pacificorp's gas plants cost about $20/MWh, and wind: $17/MWh! 3/
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(