Your book performing well on Amazon kinda disproves its cakebrained thesis, doesn’t it.
Hawley's thesis is that Big Tech is superimposing on its users fealty to progressivism in an ominously heavy-handed way. But his own success on Big Tech performatively undermines that argument.
What's funny about this grift is the glaring internal contradiction at its core.

Hawley's massive reach and book sales suggest that, even if he's right, Big Tech appears to be so incompetent that they're not worth worrying about. In which case, don't bother reading his book.
Big Tech appears to be really bad at throttling Hawley's speech. His tweets and books enjoy fantastic prominence and reach . . . which kinda sorta suggests Big Tech's "tyranny" is one that is egregiously mismanaged and incompetently self-undermining. So chuck Hawley's book, then!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Berny Belvedere

Berny Belvedere Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bernybelvedere

7 May
I am thrilled to debut Point/Counterpoint—a new @ArcDigi subsection.

This is a corner of the site that will feature contrasting perspectives on one and the same topic. The pieces won't necessarily engage each other directly, but they will argue for different conclusions.
We kick things off with a point/counterpoint on the Liz Cheney episode, which, as I wrote in a recent DiscRep entry, has transcended being about an individual legislator and has become about the future of the Republican Party.

discrep.arcdigital.media/p/the-discours…
We decided to ask two conservatives to weigh in. Since this is largely an intra-conservative dispute about what should remain in bounds for GOP leaders to do and say, we asked @SouthernKeeks and @varadmehta to give their perspectives.
Read 5 tweets
5 May
Lots of publications style themselves as being pluralist. But you're not really pluralist unless you're regularly eliciting this sort of reaction from readers.
Being genuinely pluralist is hard, because you risk repulsing people who say they want to be challenged but actually don't want that at all.
I don't want other publications to force themselves into doing things this way! That's not my point! I think it would be a terrible thing if we didn't have commentary pages from specific perspectives.
Read 5 tweets
5 May
It’s important to point out here that “stabbed them in the back again and again” refers to Cheney publicly dissenting from Trump’s unhinged insistence that Biden stole the election.
Similarly, when Dan recommends that Cheney "move off this topic," it's critical to recognize that "this topic" refers to Cheney publicly denouncing the insurrection-fomenting misinformation that Biden fraudulently hacked our electoral system.

I appreciate that Dan called Cheney's position "admirable"—I genuinely do.

But the rest of the thread provides a conception of leadership that is seriously backwards, and adopting it would reduce, rather than enhance, the effectiveness of Cheney's "admirable stance."
Read 7 tweets
3 May
Becoming a Xi apologist to own the libs. Image
lmao ImageImage
Making peace with a brutally repressive communist surveillance state engaged in tirelessly violent social engineering because Drag Queen Story Hour is EVEN WORSE
Read 5 tweets
30 Apr
I'm thrilled to debut a new @ArcDigi section called Polyarchy—named after one of my favorite works in poli sci.

I want this to be the premier place for intelligent discussion on political theory. We begin with a sharp explainer on critical theory by @MattPolProf
After picking it, I remembered that the rascals at Vox had a blog by that name (it's actually a fantastic blog). But I didn't care. As I said, I love the Dahl book and the name's got "arc" in it, so 🤷‍♂️
Earlier this week, we also debuted another section: Arc Conversations. Read the first entry here.

conversations.arcdigital.media/p/the-life-and…
Read 4 tweets
28 Apr
One America News Network is launching their own social media platform and it could not be funnier.
"No ShadowBanning or blocking here!"
Imagine debuting a dime-store Parler, which is already a penny-store Twitter.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(