Dirty Wars require cover-ups. So when it comes to Syria, there's a lot. We've seen the OPCW censor its own investigators. We're also seeing the NATO states that poured millions into the "White Helmets" desperately thwarting any public disclosure: volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achterg…
This Dutch outlet reports that a Netherlands cabinet minister, Sigrid Kaag, intended to inform lawmakers about fraud at Mayday Rescue, the group behind the White Helmets. But Kaag was pressured into not sending the letter. Netherlands saw itself politically as "extra vulnerable."
In Feb 2020, diplomats met in Istanbul about the White Helmets fraud. Discussion topics included "avoiding political risks" and "minimal exposure."
This came shortly after the death of White Helmets founder/UK operative James le Mesurier, who had admitted to financial fraud.
The White Helmets' shadiness goes far beyond financial corruption. They work closely with jihadist groups, including Al-Qaeda, & have been used as a propaganda tool to whitewash and wage the Dirty War on Syria. This includes taking part in the staged chemical incidents in Douma.
As a propaganda tool to manufacturing consent for regime change, White Helmets were highly successful. An easy way to verify is by checking whether our top "adversarial" outlets parroted the disinformation campaign (with @TheIntercept & @democracynow, it's often a yes on Syria).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Although they add their best spin, this new story further weakens the "Russian Bounties."
Declassified Biden NSC talking points contain this amazing line: "We do not have evidence that the Kremlin directed this operation, but we call on the Russian government to explain itself."
In June, these NYT reporters -- & the disgraced @rcallimachi 🤔-- claimed that alleged Russian financial transfers to Taliban "were most likely part of a bounty program" and "bolstered" CIA claims.
No mention of these alleged transfers in new NSC talking points. Where'd they go?
One of most shameful pieces in @theintercept’s history (strong competition).
@James__Harkin found staging in Douma yet still concludes “the government did it.” OPCW leaks came shortly after this ran in Feb 2019, yet zero mention by TI since.
On top of whitewashing the Douma war crime -- massacring civilians to stage a chemical attack -- & the OPCW cover-up, @James__Harkin portrays regime change orgs as independent sources.
All four of the groups in this graf are US-gov't funded, which The Intercept doesn't disclose:
Look how @James__Harkin portrays the NED-funded, NATO troll farm Bellingcat: "a U.K.-based organization specializing in open-source online investigations" run by Eliot Higgins, whose "eagle-eyed" work "won him a reputation in the field."
When it comes to their Syria cover-up, OPCW leaders should get their lies straight.
Just one graf from Ahmet Üzümcü, who presided over the Douma cover-up until it was taken over by his successor, current OPCW DG Fernando Arias, has multiple holes & lies. councilonstrategicrisks.org/2021/04/29/the…
Üzümcü claims that the OPCW team in Syria "determined the use of chlorine." He omits a small detail: the actual team found zero evidence of chlorine gas use, but had their findings censored and were then replaced by a "team" that didn't set foot in Syria. thenation.com/article/world/…
Trying to suggest a Syrian cover-up -- rather than the documented cover-up under his watch -- Üzümcü claims that the Douma team deployed "after some delay by the Syrian authorities."
He should consult the OPCW's own final report, which attributes the delay to security concerns:
You claim that Berlin Group 21 (BG21) -- eminent voices behind the Statement of Concern (SoC) on OPCW cover-up -- are a "front" for the Working Group (WG), a UK academic collective. You also claim WG "released" SoC in BG21's name.
I opened with a summary of the OPCW's Syria scandal: OPCW inspectors found no evidence of a Syrian government chemical weapons attack in the city of Douma in April 2018. But their findings were doctored and suppressed, and the entire team was sidelined:
On top of the censorship, a US delegation pressured the Douma team to back US claims of a chemical attack (its pretext for bombing Syria in April 2018).
OPCW has since attacked the dissenters; & US-UK state-funded media actors Bellingcat & BBC have been leaked disinformation:
I spoke to the UN Security Council on Friday about the OPCW's Syria cover-up.
I asked @USUN & @AmbassadorAllen of UK if they'll accept a proposal to let the OPCW's Scientific Advisory Board assess the dispute over the Douma probe & meet the dissenting inspectors:
By the time @USUN & @AmbassadorAllen could answer, they were no longer in the meeting. (I'm not sure at what point they left, possibly before my question though I doubt it).
I hope they answer. If there's nothing to hide, why not let the OPCW's own scientists resolve the issue?
I also responded to a bizarre new claim by OPCW chief Arias in response to questions from @wallacemick & @ClareDalyMEP. (