As New Evidence Emerges For COVID "Lab-Leak" Theory, Journalists Who Screamed “Conspiracy” Humiliate Themselves mtracey.substack.com/p/as-new-evide…
Some minor digging revealed that @R_H_Ebright, who was quoted widely in media reports last year as an expert authority "debunking" the lab-leak theory, is actually a strong *proponent* of the viability of the lab-leak theory! His views were grossly distorted for narrative reasons
It will definitely be up there. And it will have been primarily driven by their naked partisan desire to undermine Trump
Nothing about the question asked here is a "conspiracy theory." It's all backed up by facts. "Conspiracy theory" is just the term slapped onto inconvenient lines of questioning by lazy clickbait aggregation journalists like @atrupar
It's even more pathetic now for these journalists to continue snidely dismissing the lab-leak theory, with Trump out of the picture. What's the motive for being so impervious to new information at this point? Just petulant, toddler-like stubbornness?
Does anyone else think that if Trump's last Director of National Intelligence had said this (John Ratcliffe) instead of Joe Biden's (Avril Haines) we'd have a media meltdown over the Administration spreading hateful xenophobic misinformation? But Haines said it, and nary a peep
Honestly, this is a good point
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Pretty simple: "intersectionality" is a left-wing ideological doctrine which has now achieved such wide circulation that even the CIA is proudly espousing it. But leftists are in bizarre denial about having played any role in this, because admittedly it's pretty embarrassing
The NYC mayoral candidate most in vogue among the Activist Left immediately proclaimed the need to "believe survivors" after this incredibly dubious PR offensive was launched to nuke a rival left-wing candidate. It's all amazingly cynical and exploitative
If this evidence doesn't compel you to treat these accusations with extra suspicion -- especially as a journalist -- then you are a dogmatic zealot who cannot be reasoned with, and should just admit as much
I mean, this really has all the makings of a quintessential campaign-season hit-job. And left-wing journalists/activism just gobble it all up with no skepticism whatsoever
This stuff has completely hobbled left-wing politics. The accuser, a registered lobbyist who has a prior professional relationship with one of Stringer's rivals (
) was reportedly 30 years old at the time she now claims she was preyed upon
The initial PR offensive labeled the accuser merely as an "intern" so as to present her as vulnerable
Stringer claims he had a months-long consensual relationship with this adult woman. But because he's accepted all the premises of left/liberal orthodoxy around this issue, he can't effectively combat the accusations and is thus hobbled
A cop warns that the city is soon going to descend into even more violent anarchy:
Will probably do so: parts of the country appear to be regressing back to an early 90s level of peak violent crime, which few would’ve thought possible not long ago
You don't even have to read the full post if you don't want, just scroll through the extremely long list of public figures reciting the exact same words and phrases. It's honestly hypnotic
I don't know, I guess if I worked in corporate communications I'd say the same thing -- seems pretty good for business if your clientele is anything but explicitly conservative